Toyota Ventures’ Jim Adler says climate tech startups need to secure future buyers

Toyota Ventures

Image Credits: Toyota Ventures

Jim Adler, founder and general partner at Toyota Ventures, is concerned that climate technology gains could fall into the “valley of death” if companies fail to drum up enough demand to survive. 

And he’s not wrong to be worried. 

Climate tech investments in the first half of 2024 dipped for the second consecutive year, both in terms of overall funds invested and deal count as investors shy away from funding what can be capital-intensive, high-risk businesses without a clear path to market.   

Speaking at a Climate Week NYC event Tuesday, Adler said one way for climate tech to secure that demand is through forward offtake agreements. This is when a customer promises to buy an agreed-upon amount of a product at a specified price by a specified date. 

“I like that a lot because that encourages investors to invest to hit that date,” Adler told TechCrunch. “We do early-stage investment, which is a telescope into the future … If we know there’s a customer then we and other investors will invest at the early stage because we know we’re investing for something.”

Toyota Ventures founder Jim Adler speaks at a Climate Week NYC event.
Image Credits: Toyota Ventures

During a presentation to a room of about 75 people in midtown Manhattan, Adler laid out how historically, disruptive technologies — from railways to oil pipelines to electric power — have only been able to scale once they hit the tipping point of 10% to 20% adoption rates. 

Even if sectors have enough supply and innovation, if they don’t hit those rates, “the dynamics of capitalism don’t kick in,” Adler said.

“If the demand doesn’t show up, the tech dies,” he continued. “Capitalism is a way to scale these technologies, but not if the customers don’t show up. So how do we help customers show up?”

This is an especially prescient question when we consider that growth-stage deals in climate tech declined 33% in the first half of the year compared to the same period last year, per a CTVC report. That hinders the growth of companies that have proven their tech on a smaller scale and need additional funds to expand. 

Adler says growth-stage investors won’t invest without clear demand signals from customers, like forward offtake agreements. 

So how do startups get customers to make such agreements? Pushing the levers of government mandates is one way. 

Take Revel, for example, the startup that started as an e-moped sharing company and now is pursuing EV charging infrastructure. While organic demand for Revel’s charging services today is likely low — it’s mainly buffeted by ride-hail and taxi drivers, both from Revel’s own small service and Uber, Lyft, yellow cab and livery drivers — mandates from states like California and New York that require all new car sales to be electric by 2035 provide investors with a much-needed demand signal. Revel has raised around $270 million, per PitchBook data, with heavy hitters like BlackRock leading the startup’s rounds. 

Adler said he’s hoping low-carbon fuels, like hydrogen, will have their own moment in securing future demand. “If hydrogen shows up at $2 per kilogram in bulk, that could really push adoption to the right and up the curve,” he said.

“Investors can then invest knowing that there’s a customer at the end of this in some volume,” Adler said. “It’s super important. If this doesn’t happen, I think we all need to be a little worried.” 

Correction: A previous version of this article neglected to include that Revel’s EV charging customer base today includes ride-hail and taxi drivers from other apps and services.

Spain's exposure to climate change helps Madrid-based VC Seaya close €300M climate tech fund

Beatriz González, Seaya VC

Image Credits: Beatriz González, Seaya VC

According to a recent Dealroom report on the Spanish tech ecosystem, the combined enterprise value of Spanish startups surpassed €100 billion in 2023. In the latest confirmation of this upward trend, Madrid-based VC fund Seaya has closed Seaya Andromeda, an “Article 9” €300 million climate tech fund based out of Madrid.

Article 9 refers to the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation Act, which puts the onus on investment firms to ensure their investments have a positive impact on society or the environment. 

Seaya has been around for 12 years, mainly focusing on mission-driven startups in Europe and LatAm. The new “Andromeda” fund will invest in growth companies that specialize in energy transition, decarbonization, sustainable food value chains, and the circular economy.

The firm said the new climate fund will deploy between €7 million and €40 million as a first check; will retain capital for follow-ons; and plans to make 25 investments by the end of 2027. So far, five investments have been made from the fund (see below).

Seaya was launched back in 2013 by former private equity investor Beatriz González, who got into climate and sustainable investing after backing a recycled clothing line. She previously worked for Morgan Stanley, Excel Partners and Darby Overseas Investments in the U.S. After that she became a director of Telefónica’s pension fund, leading its alternative assets program.

Under González, Seaya has invested in climate tech companies, including Biome Makers, Clarity.ai, Crowdfarming, Descartes, RatedPower, Samara, and electric car charging stations company Wallbox (which went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2021). 

Over a call, I asked González if she thought there is a particular advantage in having a fund out of Spain tacking climate tech, given the country’s proximity to some of the worst effects of a changing climate, such as extreme heat, drought, wildfires and storms.

“It’s a good question,” she said. “If you think about energy transition and decarbonization, coming from Southern Europe, particularly Spain, we do see that we are better suited for two reasons. One is because Southern Europe is having more extreme heat waves. So clearly, there is much more social awareness. But we also think that we have competitive advantages in the industries that we are targeting.

“We’ve been pioneers in renewable energy, so we have the talent and we have the big companies in the manufacturing of auto parts. So we have a big industrial base. The same with agriculture and real estate exposure. So we do believe that we have the industry expertise and talent coming from Southern Europe, especially, and Spain, that does give us a bit of advantage.”

I also asked what kind of expertise they have that will allow them to make deep tech investment decisions about climate tech.

“We have a couple of engineers so we have that in-house expertise, but in our LP network we have big European Union banks like Santander which do project finance for energy or factories. So having access to that knowledge helps us do the due diligence and move much faster.”

Thus far, Seaya has used that knowledge to invest in several relevant companies. Spain-based augmented-reality skill training solution Seabery, for example, developed AR software and hardware for training welders, meaning they don’t need to use real welding to train, thus reducing carbon emissions by 95% per welding session.

It has also invested in U.K.-based AI-powered waste management startup Recycleye in February 2022, which builds robots to sort rubbish for recycling. 

In San Francisco, the firm invested in Pachama, a climate tech company that uses data to verify the quality of carbon credits and enable the launch of new carbon credit projects. 

The news of the new fund follows other signs of the Southern European funding renaissance. Only last week, Plus Partners launched in Barcelona, aiming to drum up a $30 million to $50 million fund.

The annual “State of European Tech” report for 2023 also found Spain’s ecosystem to be in fourth place overall and said it had the highest number of startup fundings last year.

Plumber working under kitchen sink, overhead view

A startup set out to fight climate change — it did it by helping plumbers

Plumber working under kitchen sink, overhead view

Image Credits: Juice Images / Getty Images

The founders of HERO Software didn’t start out to help small tradespeople in construction. They started out to fight the climate crisis. But in doing so, they stumbled on a way to help the whole business. Now, the company has closed a €40 million Series B financing round, and plans to expand across Europe. 

“I’m a member of the Green Party and did my PhD on solar,” co-founder Dr. Michael Kessler told TechCrunch via phone. “I looked at the best way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, such as via solar.” 

“The building sector in Germany is responsible for a huge amount of carbon dioxide emissions. We wanted to quicken the energy transition in this sector and in Germany. It turned out that tradespeople were the bottleneck for the installation of solar cells or heat pumps,” he explained. 

Kessler went on: “We founded the company to fight climate change by providing leads for tradespeople to do things like install heat pumps, and thus reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the building sector. That was our starting point. Later on, we realized we had a whole platform for tradespeople more generally.” 

So, founded in Hanover in 2020 by Kessler and Philipp Lyding, HERO Software set out to make it easier for trade business owners and employees to install not just solar, but manage any kind of workflow, on and off site. So that’s plumbing, carpentry, photovoltaic installation and electrical services, you name it.

The platform now handles first customer contact, planning and execution of projects on-site, and the invoicing and payments, and now has 20,000 users in the DACH region. 

Companies like Jobber (which has raised $183.5 million) and ServiceTitan (raised $1.5 billion) are best known as platforms on which tradespeople run their small businesses. But in Europe this is a far less tapped market, although it’s growing. German startup Plancraft recently completed a €12 million Series A.

Known as the platform for tradesmen SMEs in the German-speaking DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) region, HERO’s financing round was led by Eight Roads Ventures, with existing investor Cusp Capital also participating again.  

In a statement, Lucile Cornet, partner at Eight Roads Ventures said: “At Eight Roads we have witnessed many successful stories in Vertical SaaS, and HERO stands out for its comprehensive product and experienced team. We strongly believe that vertical SaaS will enable entire industries to become more digital and sustainably successful.”

HERO now plans to expand in Poland, France and the Netherlands: “France is maybe two, three years behind of Germany from a technology perspective. If you look at other markets in Europe, it’s a similar picture. Germany, Nordics and the U.K. are the exception,” Kessler said. 

Spain's exposure to climate change helps Madrid-based VC Seaya close €300M climate tech fund

Beatriz González, Seaya VC

Image Credits: Beatriz González, Seaya VC

According to a recent Dealroom report on the Spanish tech ecosystem, the combined enterprise value of Spanish startups surpassed €100 billion in 2023. In the latest confirmation of this upward trend, Madrid-based VC fund Seaya has closed Seaya Andromeda, an “Article 9” €300 million climate tech fund based out of Madrid.

Article 9 refers to the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation Act, which puts the onus on investment firms to ensure their investments have a positive impact on society or the environment. 

Seaya has been around for 12 years, mainly focusing on mission-driven startups in Europe and LatAm. The new “Andromeda” fund will invest in growth companies that specialize in energy transition, decarbonization, sustainable food value chains, and the circular economy.

The firm said the new climate fund will deploy between €7 million and €40 million as a first check; will retain capital for follow-ons; and plans to make 25 investments by the end of 2027. So far, five investments have been made from the fund (see below).

Seaya was launched back in 2013 by former private equity investor Beatriz González, who got into climate and sustainable investing after backing a recycled clothing line. She previously worked for Morgan Stanley, Excel Partners and Darby Overseas Investments in the U.S. After that she became a director of Telefónica’s pension fund, leading its alternative assets program.

Under González, Seaya has invested in climate tech companies, including Biome Makers, Clarity.ai, Crowdfarming, Descartes, RatedPower, Samara, and electric car charging stations company Wallbox (which went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2021). 

Over a call, I asked González if she thought there is a particular advantage in having a fund out of Spain tacking climate tech, given the country’s proximity to some of the worst effects of a changing climate, such as extreme heat, drought, wildfires and storms.

“It’s a good question,” she said. “If you think about energy transition and decarbonization, coming from Southern Europe, particularly Spain, we do see that we are better suited for two reasons. One is because Southern Europe is having more extreme heat waves. So clearly, there is much more social awareness. But we also think that we have competitive advantages in the industries that we are targeting.

“We’ve been pioneers in renewable energy, so we have the talent and we have the big companies in the manufacturing of auto parts. So we have a big industrial base. The same with agriculture and real estate exposure. So we do believe that we have the industry expertise and talent coming from Southern Europe, especially, and Spain, that does give us a bit of advantage.”

I also asked what kind of expertise they have that will allow them to make deep tech investment decisions about climate tech.

“We have a couple of engineers so we have that in-house expertise, but in our LP network we have big European Union banks like Santander which do project finance for energy or factories. So having access to that knowledge helps us do the due diligence and move much faster.”

Thus far, Seaya has used that knowledge to invest in several relevant companies. Spain-based augmented-reality skill training solution Seabery, for example, developed AR software and hardware for training welders, meaning they don’t need to use real welding to train, thus reducing carbon emissions by 95% per welding session.

It has also invested in U.K.-based AI-powered waste management startup Recycleye in February 2022, which builds robots to sort rubbish for recycling. 

In San Francisco, the firm invested in Pachama, a climate tech company that uses data to verify the quality of carbon credits and enable the launch of new carbon credit projects. 

The news of the new fund follows other signs of the Southern European funding renaissance. Only last week, Plus Partners launched in Barcelona, aiming to drum up a $30 million to $50 million fund.

The annual “State of European Tech” report for 2023 also found Spain’s ecosystem to be in fourth place overall and said it had the highest number of startup fundings last year.

A startup set out to fight climate change — it did it by helping plumbers

Plumber working under kitchen sink, overhead view

Image Credits: Juice Images / Getty Images

The founders of HERO Software didn’t start out to help small tradespeople in construction. They started out to fight the climate crisis. But in doing so, they stumbled on a way to help the whole business. Now, the company has closed a €40 million Series B financing round, and plans to expand across Europe. 

“I’m a member of the Green Party and did my PhD on solar,” co-founder Dr. Michael Kessler told TechCrunch via phone. “I looked at the best way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, such as via solar.” 

“The building sector in Germany is responsible for a huge amount of carbon dioxide emissions. We wanted to quicken the energy transition in this sector and in Germany. It turned out that tradespeople were the bottleneck for the installation of solar cells or heat pumps,” he explained. 

Kessler went on: “We founded the company to fight climate change by providing leads for tradespeople to do things like install heat pumps, and thus reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the building sector. That was our starting point. Later on, we realized we had a whole platform for tradespeople more generally.” 

So, founded in Hanover in 2020 by Kessler and Philipp Lyding, HERO Software set out to make it easier for trade business owners and employees to install not just solar, but manage any kind of workflow, on and off site. So that’s plumbing, carpentry, photovoltaic installation and electrical services, you name it.

The platform now handles first customer contact, planning and execution of projects on-site, and the invoicing and payments, and now has 20,000 users in the DACH region. 

Companies like Jobber (which has raised $183.5 million) and ServiceTitan (raised $1.5 billion) are best known as platforms on which tradespeople run their small businesses. But in Europe this is a far less tapped market, although it’s growing. German startup Plancraft recently completed a €12 million Series A.

Known as the platform for tradesmen SMEs in the German-speaking DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) region, HERO’s financing round was led by Eight Roads Ventures, with existing investor Cusp Capital also participating again.  

In a statement, Lucile Cornet, partner at Eight Roads Ventures said: “At Eight Roads we have witnessed many successful stories in Vertical SaaS, and HERO stands out for its comprehensive product and experienced team. We strongly believe that vertical SaaS will enable entire industries to become more digital and sustainably successful.”

HERO now plans to expand in Poland, France and the Netherlands: “France is maybe two, three years behind of Germany from a technology perspective. If you look at other markets in Europe, it’s a similar picture. Germany, Nordics and the U.K. are the exception,” Kessler said. 

Spain's exposure to climate change helps Madrid-based VC Seaya close €300M climate tech fund

Beatriz González, Seaya VC

Image Credits: Beatriz González, Seaya VC

According to a recent Dealroom report on the Spanish tech ecosystem, the combined enterprise value of Spanish startups surpassed €100 billion in 2023. In the latest confirmation of this upward trend, Madrid-based VC fund Seaya has closed Seaya Andromeda, an “Article 9” €300 million climate tech fund based out of Madrid.

Article 9 refers to the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation Act, which puts the onus on investment firms to ensure their investments have a positive impact on society or the environment. 

Seaya has been around for 12 years, mainly focusing on mission-driven startups in Europe and LatAm. The new “Andromeda” fund will invest in growth companies that specialize in energy transition, decarbonization, sustainable food value chains, and the circular economy.

The firm said the new climate fund will deploy between €7 million and €40 million as a first check; will retain capital for follow-ons; and plans to make 25 investments by the end of 2027. So far, five investments have been made from the fund (see below).

Seaya was launched back in 2013 by former private equity investor Beatriz González, who got into climate and sustainable investing after backing a recycled clothing line. She previously worked for Morgan Stanley, Excel Partners and Darby Overseas Investments in the U.S. After that she became a director of Telefónica’s pension fund, leading its alternative assets program.

Under González, Seaya has invested in climate tech companies, including Biome Makers, Clarity.ai, Crowdfarming, Descartes, RatedPower, Samara, and electric car charging stations company Wallbox (which went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2021). 

Over a call, I asked González if she thought there is a particular advantage in having a fund out of Spain tacking climate tech, given the country’s proximity to some of the worst effects of a changing climate, such as extreme heat, drought, wildfires and storms.

“It’s a good question,” she said. “If you think about energy transition and decarbonization, coming from Southern Europe, particularly Spain, we do see that we are better suited for two reasons. One is because Southern Europe is having more extreme heat waves. So clearly, there is much more social awareness. But we also think that we have competitive advantages in the industries that we are targeting.

“We’ve been pioneers in renewable energy, so we have the talent and we have the big companies in the manufacturing of auto parts. So we have a big industrial base. The same with agriculture and real estate exposure. So we do believe that we have the industry expertise and talent coming from Southern Europe, especially, and Spain, that does give us a bit of advantage.”

I also asked what kind of expertise they have that will allow them to make deep tech investment decisions about climate tech.

“We have a couple of engineers so we have that in-house expertise, but in our LP network we have big European Union banks like Santander which do project finance for energy or factories. So having access to that knowledge helps us do the due diligence and move much faster.”

Thus far, Seaya has used that knowledge to invest in several relevant companies. Spain-based augmented-reality skill training solution Seabery, for example, developed AR software and hardware for training welders, meaning they don’t need to use real welding to train, thus reducing carbon emissions by 95% per welding session.

It has also invested in U.K.-based AI-powered waste management startup Recycleye in February 2022, which builds robots to sort rubbish for recycling. 

In San Francisco, the firm invested in Pachama, a climate tech company that uses data to verify the quality of carbon credits and enable the launch of new carbon credit projects. 

The news of the new fund follows other signs of the Southern European funding renaissance. Only last week, Plus Partners launched in Barcelona, aiming to drum up a $30 million to $50 million fund.

The annual “State of European Tech” report for 2023 also found Spain’s ecosystem to be in fourth place overall and said it had the highest number of startup fundings last year.

Piggy bank sits in the middle of a circular maze.

As more than $1 trillion flows into climate tech, incentive-tracking apps find firm footing

Piggy bank sits in the middle of a circular maze.

Image Credits: Sezeryadigar / Getty Images

Spend some time with people in the climate tech world and you’ll soon learn that a lot of them share something in common: They’re not used to having a lot of money.

That’s because for years, climate represented a cost for many businesses, not an opportunity. Fortunately, that’s started to change recently as investors have rushed into the space, seeking opportunities in “double-digit trillion-dollar markets” that are “largely decoupled from general tech investing,” Joshua Posamentier, managing partner at Congruent, told TechCrunch+.

Investment in climate tech has been gathering pace over the past five years or so. While the sector wasn’t entirely immune to the slowdown that gripped the rest of the startup world over the past couple of years, we did see signs of a rally in the third quarter.

This continued strength is due in part to both U.S. and European commitments to climate-forward industrial policies. Between the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in the U.S. and the Green Deal in the EU, nearly $1 trillion in tax credits, grants, and other incentives are available for climate- and energy-related investments and purchases.

But that trillion-dollar forecast actually might be a conservative one. The IRA alone might yield more than that since many of the tax credits are uncapped; Goldman Sachs estimates the law’s climate provisions might pay out $1.2 trillion in incentives, spurring some $3 trillion in private investment.

That’s not enough to get the U.S. or the EU’s economy to net-zero carbon emissions (or to make up for historical emissions), but it’s a down payment so large it can be hard to keep track of it all.

In fact, climate tech today finds itself in the unusual position of being so awash in cash (relatively speaking) that there are a number of websites, apps and startups rushing to track it all and help companies and customers make the most of the incentives.

Making sense of it all

“Unfortunately, there’s no comprehensive database out there for all of these rebates and incentives,” said Thomas Stephens, co-founder of Upfront, a startup that’s cataloging incentives for merchants.

For companies, it’s a cost of doing business to gather and understand and integrate those incentives into their sales proposals, according to Tom Carden, head of engineering at Rewiring America, a nonprofit that advocates for the electrification of the economy.

Financial incentives for increased energy efficiency aren’t anything new. Many state and local governments have run energy efficiency programs for decades, but many of these programs evolved independently, and the lack of consistency and centralization has become burdensome for industries and consumers. One electrification startup in Colorado, Carden recalled, spent countless hours developing and maintaining an incentive-tracking spreadsheet so vast they called it “the Big Kahuna.”

When the IRA was passed in 2022, the 752-page law not only brought its own incentives, but it also brought national attention to the complex world of incentives that predated it. Rewiring America saw an opportunity to simplify things for consumers and introduced the IRA Savings Calculator. The idea behind it is to “explain the policy itself, because it’s not clear just how valuable it can be to every individual household,” Carden said.

The organization says 600,000 households have used the calculator, and Carden’s team has built an API that allows other organizations to access the data that underpins the tool. About 200 have signed up so far, Carden said.

Currently, the IRA Savings Calculator is focused only on the IRA (obviously), but Rewiring America is also working to make sense of existing electrification and efficiency incentives. Some of these offers are run by states, others by local governments, and still others by state-mandated energy efficiency programs funded by utilities, resulting in a patchwork of incentives that can be challenging for even the most informed consumers to digest.

“We’re not alone in this. There are other nonprofits and for-profit companies trying to figure out how to wrangle this data,” Carden said.

One of those companies is Upfront, which Stephens founded with Andrew Hoskins after Hoskins was venting about applying for a heat pump rebate. Stephens told Hoskins, “You just spent 5 years at Affirm. You’re an engineer. If you can’t figure this out, how is your everyday customer supposed to?”

The two started talking to merchants to gauge interest in a service that would streamline the efficiency rebate process. They received positive feedback and, after honing their pitch and starting the company, ended up joining Y Combinator’s Winter 2023 batch. The company has raised about $1 million in pre-seed funding, Stephens told TechCrunch+.

Upfront ingests a merchant’s product list and matches their inventory with data on energy efficiency, rebate availability, and so on. Depending on what the merchant wants for their site, the startup provides either a Javascript snippet or access to an API so that the merchant can display rebate availability on a product’s page.

“On the product page, a customer can just click and find that a $2,500 heat pump, after rebates and incentives, is going to be $700,” Stephens said. In the future, Upfront would like to provide financing for those purchases.

Finding nondilutive funding

While the IRA’s consumer-facing tax credits have received much of the publicity, there’s also money available for startups and established companies. Hydrogen, energy storage, solar and carbon capture are all key sectors targeted by the Act, and many of these incentives are production tax credits. While they aren’t direct sources of funding or awards, they do make the economics more favorable, which in turn helps strengthen companies’ applications for other incentives, including grants and other awards.

Though government grants and awards are a great source of nondilutive funding, they’re anything but free. “One of the most painful things that companies face when they apply for a lot of those awards is the timeline and process,” Mitko Simeonov, founder of Pioneer, told TechCrunch+. Even the application itself isn’t simple, he added. “Those take a lot of time and effort to get right.”

Simeonov estimates that climate tech companies are eligible for tens of billions of dollars of government funding. To help those companies win more awards, Pioneer maintains a database of available government funding and suggests potential matches using AI models trained on public and private data about the company.

When a client decides to start an application, Pioneer creates a dashboard to help them manage the process. Then, to write the application, the startup uses generative AI trained on the client’s prior grant applications and other information to produce drafts and supporting documents. If the AI thinks something is missing from the application but isn’t able to suggest a solution, Pioneer’s software will prompt the client with a “probing question,” Simeonov said.

Pioneer’s direct competitors are government grant consultants, who do much of the same work. But the startup is hoping that its software is sophisticated enough that expensive, labor-intensive consultancies won’t be as necessary. It already has several customers in sectors like logistics, batteries and electric vehicles, Simeonov said.

Just the beginning?

The arrival of incentive-tracking apps and startups suggests that climate tech is at a unique point in its history. After struggling for years to find footing, the sector has found purchase with not only investors, but also governments around the world.

There’s always risk in basing a business model or building a tool dependent on the stroke of a politician’s pen, but the coincidence of the IRA, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Green Deal suggests that industrial policy is undergoing a sea change that will be difficult to counter. It’s possible that the EU might face a budget crunch or that a future U.S. administration could rally congressional support to undo the landmark laws, but as the policies are more fully implemented, that’s looking less likely.

With the IRA’s climate provisions scheduled to sunset in 2032, companies like Upfront and Pioneer, as well as others like Eli and Pencil, will have nearly a decade to build their customer bases. And the market is likely to grow: To tackle climate change, McKinsey estimates that the world will need to invest an additional $3.5 trillion in energy and land use every year through 2050.

The last few years might have felt big, but the coming decades could be even bigger for climate tech. The flow of cash is unlikely to slow any time soon.

Piggy bank sits in the middle of a circular maze.

As more than $1 trillion flows into climate tech, incentive-tracking apps find firm footing

Piggy bank sits in the middle of a circular maze.

Image Credits: Sezeryadigar / Getty Images

Spend some time with people in the climate tech world and you’ll soon learn that a lot of them share something in common: They’re not used to having a lot of money.

That’s because for years, climate represented a cost for many businesses, not an opportunity. Fortunately, that’s started to change recently as investors have rushed into the space, seeking opportunities in “double-digit trillion-dollar markets” that are “largely decoupled from general tech investing,” Joshua Posamentier, managing partner at Congruent, told TechCrunch+.

Investment in climate tech has been gathering pace over the past five years or so. While the sector wasn’t entirely immune to the slowdown that gripped the rest of the startup world over the past couple of years, we did see signs of a rally in the third quarter.

This continued strength is due in part to both U.S. and European commitments to climate-forward industrial policies. Between the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in the U.S. and the Green Deal in the EU, nearly $1 trillion in tax credits, grants, and other incentives are available for climate- and energy-related investments and purchases.

But that trillion-dollar forecast actually might be a conservative one. The IRA alone might yield more than that since many of the tax credits are uncapped; Goldman Sachs estimates the law’s climate provisions might pay out $1.2 trillion in incentives, spurring some $3 trillion in private investment.

That’s not enough to get the U.S. or the EU’s economy to net-zero carbon emissions (or to make up for historical emissions), but it’s a down payment so large it can be hard to keep track of it all.

In fact, climate tech today finds itself in the unusual position of being so awash in cash (relatively speaking) that there are a number of websites, apps and startups rushing to track it all and help companies and customers make the most of the incentives.

Making sense of it all

“Unfortunately, there’s no comprehensive database out there for all of these rebates and incentives,” said Thomas Stephens, co-founder of Upfront, a startup that’s cataloging incentives for merchants.

For companies, it’s a cost of doing business to gather and understand and integrate those incentives into their sales proposals, according to Tom Carden, head of engineering at Rewiring America, a nonprofit that advocates for the electrification of the economy.

Financial incentives for increased energy efficiency aren’t anything new. Many state and local governments have run energy efficiency programs for decades, but many of these programs evolved independently, and the lack of consistency and centralization has become burdensome for industries and consumers. One electrification startup in Colorado, Carden recalled, spent countless hours developing and maintaining an incentive-tracking spreadsheet so vast they called it “the Big Kahuna.”

When the IRA was passed in 2022, the 752-page law not only brought its own incentives, but it also brought national attention to the complex world of incentives that predated it. Rewiring America saw an opportunity to simplify things for consumers and introduced the IRA Savings Calculator. The idea behind it is to “explain the policy itself, because it’s not clear just how valuable it can be to every individual household,” Carden said.

The organization says 600,000 households have used the calculator, and Carden’s team has built an API that allows other organizations to access the data that underpins the tool. About 200 have signed up so far, Carden said.

Currently, the IRA Savings Calculator is focused only on the IRA (obviously), but Rewiring America is also working to make sense of existing electrification and efficiency incentives. Some of these offers are run by states, others by local governments, and still others by state-mandated energy efficiency programs funded by utilities, resulting in a patchwork of incentives that can be challenging for even the most informed consumers to digest.

“We’re not alone in this. There are other nonprofits and for-profit companies trying to figure out how to wrangle this data,” Carden said.

One of those companies is Upfront, which Stephens founded with Andrew Hoskins after Hoskins was venting about applying for a heat pump rebate. Stephens told Hoskins, “You just spent 5 years at Affirm. You’re an engineer. If you can’t figure this out, how is your everyday customer supposed to?”

The two started talking to merchants to gauge interest in a service that would streamline the efficiency rebate process. They received positive feedback and, after honing their pitch and starting the company, ended up joining Y Combinator’s Winter 2023 batch. The company has raised about $1 million in pre-seed funding, Stephens told TechCrunch+.

Upfront ingests a merchant’s product list and matches their inventory with data on energy efficiency, rebate availability, and so on. Depending on what the merchant wants for their site, the startup provides either a Javascript snippet or access to an API so that the merchant can display rebate availability on a product’s page.

“On the product page, a customer can just click and find that a $2,500 heat pump, after rebates and incentives, is going to be $700,” Stephens said. In the future, Upfront would like to provide financing for those purchases.

Finding nondilutive funding

While the IRA’s consumer-facing tax credits have received much of the publicity, there’s also money available for startups and established companies. Hydrogen, energy storage, solar and carbon capture are all key sectors targeted by the Act, and many of these incentives are production tax credits. While they aren’t direct sources of funding or awards, they do make the economics more favorable, which in turn helps strengthen companies’ applications for other incentives, including grants and other awards.

Though government grants and awards are a great source of nondilutive funding, they’re anything but free. “One of the most painful things that companies face when they apply for a lot of those awards is the timeline and process,” Mitko Simeonov, founder of Pioneer, told TechCrunch+. Even the application itself isn’t simple, he added. “Those take a lot of time and effort to get right.”

Simeonov estimates that climate tech companies are eligible for tens of billions of dollars of government funding. To help those companies win more awards, Pioneer maintains a database of available government funding and suggests potential matches using AI models trained on public and private data about the company.

When a client decides to start an application, Pioneer creates a dashboard to help them manage the process. Then, to write the application, the startup uses generative AI trained on the client’s prior grant applications and other information to produce drafts and supporting documents. If the AI thinks something is missing from the application but isn’t able to suggest a solution, Pioneer’s software will prompt the client with a “probing question,” Simeonov said.

Pioneer’s direct competitors are government grant consultants, who do much of the same work. But the startup is hoping that its software is sophisticated enough that expensive, labor-intensive consultancies won’t be as necessary. It already has several customers in sectors like logistics, batteries and electric vehicles, Simeonov said.

Just the beginning?

The arrival of incentive-tracking apps and startups suggests that climate tech is at a unique point in its history. After struggling for years to find footing, the sector has found purchase with not only investors, but also governments around the world.

There’s always risk in basing a business model or building a tool dependent on the stroke of a politician’s pen, but the coincidence of the IRA, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Green Deal suggests that industrial policy is undergoing a sea change that will be difficult to counter. It’s possible that the EU might face a budget crunch or that a future U.S. administration could rally congressional support to undo the landmark laws, but as the policies are more fully implemented, that’s looking less likely.

With the IRA’s climate provisions scheduled to sunset in 2032, companies like Upfront and Pioneer, as well as others like Eli and Pencil, will have nearly a decade to build their customer bases. And the market is likely to grow: To tackle climate change, McKinsey estimates that the world will need to invest an additional $3.5 trillion in energy and land use every year through 2050.

The last few years might have felt big, but the coming decades could be even bigger for climate tech. The flow of cash is unlikely to slow any time soon.

India farmer sowing rice seedlings in a farm

Varaha helps Indian farmers reduce climate-harming practices like burning crop residue and flooding rice fields

India farmer sowing rice seedlings in a farm

Image Credits: DESHAKALYAN CHOWDHURY / AFP / Getty Images

Varaha has attracted investor interest as an end-to-end developer for carbon credits that it generates by working with thousands of smallholder farmers yielding crops on a total land of over 700,000 acres across India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Kenya.

The voluntary carbon offset market will reach $250 billion by 2050 from $2 billion in 2020, according to estimates made by Morgan Stanley. However, awareness of the monetary and environmental benefits associated with carbon credits is low.

Generally speaking, carbon offsets are granted when an organization or company engages in a practice that reduces CO2 emissions, such as replacing fossil-fuel-based energy sources with renewable energy sources, or (rarely) removes CO2 from the atmosphere through technology like carbon capture. Polluters then purchase these offsets to counter the CO2 they’re emitting, which lets them claim to be reducing their emissions or heading toward “net zero” carbon emissions. This has become increasingly important as awareness of CO2‘s role in global warming has grown among the public and among public-company investors, and as governments have begun to face political pressure to cut CO2 emissions.

But not all carbon offsets are created equal, and the market is largely unregulated. There have also been highly publicized instances of carbon credits being granted for projects that did little to reduce emissions, leading to more uncertainty and downward price pressure in the market.

Big entities in the space find it hard to work at the grassroots level. Some large-scale carbon credit companies prefer working on renewable energy projects, including shifting to EVs or installing solar panels to generate electricity, as they require fewer resources and less effort to measure and monitor carbon emissions. Similarly, industry giants in various sectors such as automobile, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals have been generating nature-based carbon credits natively, which leads to conflicts and criticism against their offsets.

Enter Varaha.

After spending 17 years academically and professionally with farmers in India, agricultural engineer Madhur Jain co-founded Varaha in 2022 along with Ankita Garg (COO) and Vishal Kuchanur (CTO). Years before starting Varaha, Jain — while working with the Nobel Prize laureate Michael Kremer at the social enterprise Precision Agriculture for Development as its country director for India — realized the need to incentivize farmers to limit crop residue burning, which contributes to a smog blanket during the winter. It was early, as no methodologies were available at the time to create carbon credits from agriculture. However, the 34-year-old entrepreneur decided to start his venture once the methodologies started appearing in developed markets, including the U.S. and Europe.

Varaha now works with over 100 partners across all the geographies it presents to onboard smallholder farmers to help them follow sustainable and regenerative farming practices that result in quantifying emission reduction and soil organic carbon sequestration. This leads to the creation of nature-based carbon credits, which the startup sells to companies — mainly in Europe.

The startup has developed its measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) platform that uses a mix of remote sensing, machine learning and scientific research to quantify the sequestration (safely separating and storing harmful substances, including carbon dioxide) and limit greenhouse gases from regenerative agriculture, afforestation and biochar projects. Consequently, these projects help farmers enhance their productivity, boost crop yields, save water, increase biodiversity, and improve climate adaptation.

Typically, farmers follow certain practices that eventually lead to carbon emissions. For instance, when farmers flood their farms to grow rice, Jain explained, the contact between the soil and the environment breaks due to the water layer and generates methane-emitting bacteria. This is so potent that 2% of the total global emissions today is rice methane emission, he said. Farmers can reduce that impact by limiting the use of water.

In such cases, the nature-based carbon credit approach helps generate more revenues and limits their contribution toward impacting the atmosphere.

Unlike nature-based credits, carbon credits from renewable energy projects are easy to measure and record and do not involve co-benefits to nature. Thus, Jain said they were priced anywhere between $0.5 and $4 — one-fifth to one-seventh the price of nature-based credits. However, selling carbon credits generated from nature, including agriculture, requires additional checks and balances and third-party audits.

Varaha co-founders Vishal Kuchanur, Ankita Garg, Madhur Jain
Varaha co-founders (from left to right): Vishal Kuchanur, Ankita Garg, Madhur Jain. Image Credits: Varaha

“It’s basically like coming full circle in terms of identifying a problem much before and then now finding a solution and building towards that,” Jain told TechCrunch in an interview.

Now the company has raised $8.7 million in an investment round led by RTP Global as the two-year-old startup strives to expand access to carbon credits for smallholder farmers and enter new markets in the next couple of years.

The fresh funding comes amid an ongoing market slowdown that has significantly impacted startups in emerging markets, including India, and restricted investors from taking different bets.

Varaha works with the NGO Verra, which runs a significant carbon crediting program, to get its data and measurement practices audited before generating credits. Jain told TechCrunch the startup went through the audit process last year, which took seven and a half months.

For agricultural projects, the process also requires impaneled scientists to be deployed to go through the available data models and validate them to determine whether they are suitable for the regional conditions.

That said, the rigorous oversight helps bring high-quality carbon credits that can be sold globally.

Farmers get 60% to 65% of the carbon credit sales value, while Varaha takes a cut between 20% and 25%, depending on the category of the carbon credit, and 10% to 15% goes to its partners.

Varaha said it had already contracted and sold more than 230,000 carbon credits across a range of project portfolios and counted Klimate in Denmark, Goodcarbon in Germany, and Carbonfuture in Switzerland, among its key customers. It has also received interest from financial institutions and tech companies across the U.S. and U.K.

When asked why Varaha has no Indian customers for the credits it creates even though India is one of the largest carbon emitters, Jain told TechCrunch consumer behavior is pushing companies in Europe and the U.S. to reduce their carbon emissions voluntarily. “There is no parallel you can draw between India and the developed markets . . . there is a massive fragmentation on the ground. The piece of land for farmers is much smaller, and the farmer’s income is much smaller. So, you have to understand the underlying piece of the infrastructural challenge,” she said.

Nonetheless, the startup does see some interest coming from India, too.

“We expect that in the next six to nine months, we will have some active conversations,” he stated. “The willingness to pay a premium exists mostly in the Western world today; hence, that has been our major focus. But we do see that shifting in the next four to five years and coming towards India as well.”

Varaha plans to use its fresh fundraising to enter five to six countries in the next 12 to 18 months and has already chalked out eight to 10 markets across South Asia, Southeast Asia and East Africa. Some of these markets will be Vietnam, Thailand, Zambia and Tanzania, Jain said.

The startup also looks to hire more people in its team of 51 full-time employees to enhance its tech and science, where half of its workforce is focused, and build a sales team across the U.S. and U.K.

“We are also looking at other innovative carbon capture solutions at the farm level,” Jain said. “So piloting these solutions and building them out is another key area to focus upon for this fundraiser.”

Jain’s experience in the domain and his grounded approach convinced RTP Global to lead the Series A round — after putting a small angel ticket in its seed round in 2022.

“We watched what he is able to deliver through a year and were very impressed with the result,” RTP Global partner Galina Chifina told TechCrunch. “The team has made quite a few calls with the farmers . . . saw what happens on the ground, not just in the boardrooms.”

Varaha’s Series A round also saw participation from the startup’s existing investors, Omnivore and Orios Venture Partners, as well as the inaugural investment by Japan’s institutional investor Norinchukin Bank in an Indian startup. It also included investments from AgFunder and IMC Pan Asia Alliance Group’s arm, Octave Wellbeing Economy Fund. The new round brings the startup’s total funding to $12.7 million, including the $4 million seed investment from late 2022.

A refinery spews out greenhouse gases, one of the main causes of global warming, in the refining process of oil.

How a new class of climate startups could get a boost from the SEC

A refinery spews out greenhouse gases, one of the main causes of global warming, in the refining process of oil.

Image Credits: MattGush / Getty Images

Months of speculation will finally come to an end on Wednesday when the Securities and Exchange Commission votes on its much-debated climate disclosure rule.

If adopted, the rule would require companies to disclose greenhouse gas emissions, already a requirement in other economies, including the European Union and China. The bid would help inform investors about any climate- or energy transition-related risks publicly traded companies face.

With more and more consumers and regulators pushing companies to track and disclose their carbon footprints, a flurry of startups that specialize in tackling the problem have emerged. And depending on how far the SEC takes the proposed climate disclosure rule, many of these startups stand to benefit.

Companies report on greenhouse gas emissions using three buckets called Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. Scope 1 emissions are those that result directly from the company’s operations such as the burning of coal to heat a blast furnace at a steel mill. Scope 2 emissions come from purchased energy such as electricity, natural gas or steam. Scope 3 emissions are everything else and usually result from pollution produced throughout the supply chain.

Scope 3 emissions are the broadest category, and if the SEC would require their reporting, the effects would ripple far beyond just publicly traded companies. Many companies, including Walmart, ExxonMobil, Gap, and BlackRock, have publicly voiced their opposition to any Scope 3 reporting, and the requirement is unlikely to appear in the final draft, Reuters reported. Others, including Amazon, Ralph Lauren, and Chevron, are on record supporting Scope 3 disclosures.

If the SEC’s final draft does eliminate any Scope 3 disclosure requirements, the remaining Scope 1 and 2 emissions would represent a smaller but still significant chunk of the U.S.’s carbon pollution. They would also spur companies to bolster their current reporting processes, pushing many to seek outside help. Here are a few places they might turn.

Five startups

There are dozens of companies that handle carbon measurement, tracking, reporting and verification. This sampling illustrates the variety of early- to late-stage companies, which serve a range of organizations from large enterprises to scrappy startups.

Arcadia

Climate-tech unicorn Arcadia has spent years amassing electricity-related emissions data from households, companies, and utilities, and in 2022, it announced a partnership with Salesforce to integrate its Data Connector product into the SaaS giant’s Net Zero Cloud offering. The product works with 9,500 utilities and energy providers in 52 countries, allowing companies to automate tracking of their Scope 2 emissions and produce auditable reports. Given its focus on Scope 2, Arcadia is well positioned to benefit from the SEC’s new rules.

Arcadia has raised more than $575 million and is valued at $1.5 billion post-money, according to PitchBook. Look for it to be one of the first climate tech companies to list publicly when the IPO window opens.

Watershed

Another climate-tech unicorn, Watershed handles emissions across all scopes with a focus on financial institutions, consumer goods companies and companies that want to rein in their Scope 3 footprint. The company has raised $210 million with a $1.7 billion post-money valuation, according to PitchBook, the sort of valuation at which investors might push for an IPO. The company has attracted some prominent investors, including Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins and Lowercarbon.

Planet FWD

Planet FWD was founded to sell carbon-neutral, organic crackers. As founder Julia Collins started diving deeper into her company’s carbon footprint, she realized that the real challenge lay not in developing the product, but finding ways to measure, reduce and offset its related emissions. So she did what many founders do — she pivoted.

The result was a carbon assessment platform tailored to the needs of consumer goods companies, especially those that sell food products. The company raised a $10 million Series A in 2022, and it’s valued at $40 million post-money, according to PitchBook.

CarbonChain

CarbonChain stands out for its detailed approach. The startup, which raised a $10 million Series A last year, has spent the last several years amassing data that it says covers 80% of the world’s emissions. How did it get it? By working on the ground to gather information and by talking with companies in industries that are some of the world’s most polluting.

The founders used to work on oil and gas projects, and they have a familiarity with the industries that others may not. The startup works with lenders and insurers to help secure its customers discounted rates. The financial institutions have agreed because the data shows that low-carbon assets tend to have lower operating costs.

Bend

Corporate spend was a hot investment for a while, attracting billions in capital, but as the sector matured, specialization was all but certain to emerge. Enter Bend, a corporate spend startup that focuses not just on tracking expenses, but also on carbon emissions. It raised a $2.5 million seed round last year. Bend launched with a subscription-based API that companies could tap to speed their carbon accounting process, but it quickly pivoted to a corporate spend card with carbon accounting included for free. It’s a clever twist that should help companies large and small get a handle on their footprints.

Driving forces

It’s not just regulatory activity that’s driving the surge of startups: As AI has matured, startups have been able to harness the technology to provide more accurate reports of Scope 3 emissions, which often suffer from data gaps and are the hardest to estimate. As companies refine their AI approaches, Scope 3 estimates will only improve, perhaps softening some of the opposition to mandatory reporting at that scale. Already, some companies have fully embraced Scope 3 reporting, using transparency as a selling point.

Even if governments change course and lessen requirements, some degree of carbon accounting will likely be embedded in developed economies in the coming years, if it isn’t already. The question isn’t whether, but how much companies will have to report?

For startups that make that process simpler, questions and uncertainty can only lead to more opportunities.