The top AI deals in Europe this year

euros money

Image Credits: Peter Linke (opens in a new window) / Flickr (opens in a new window) under a Public Domain (opens in a new window) license.

Startups overall are still facing strong headwinds when it comes to raising venture capital funding. Q2 was only a modest improvement on the low points of the previous two quarters, according to Crunchbase.

But there is one category that still seems to be opening doors — and checkbooks: AI.

In the U.S., artificial intelligence accounted for nearly 30 deals of over $100 million so far in 2024, making it the global leader at the moment. Europe, however, is not too far behind: Our research shows that as of August, Europe has seen 14 investments valued at $100 million or more for AI companies, with one company snagging two investments.

AI is driving the European long-tail startup ecosystem in a big way. Cumulatively, PitchBook data shows that there have been more than 1,700 funding rounds for AI startups in the region so far in 2024.

The biggest AI startups, those building foundational models, continue to exert the most gravitational pull when it comes to funding, in part because AI remains a costly area for development. Sources tell us that Mistral AI, which already has netted investments of more than $1 billion this year, is apparently fundraising again.

Mistral is headquartered in Paris, a city that has really established itself as the center of AI development in Europe, specifically in the category of generative AI. When you consider how some promising emerging markets like India are seeing only a fraction of the AI funding that more developed markets are getting, it will be interesting to see if Paris can sustain that leadership and capitalize on it — or alternatively how the balance of power (and money) might shift.

Whether it’s self-driving tech, LLM startups or players that also have hardware components, there are four main reasons why AI is commanding big investments:

The compute power it takes to train and run queries through AI models is immense. AI startups are racing to recruit talent. In some cases, AI companies will need money to pay out royalties on all the content IP they’re using to train and run their models. Investors grappling with giant funds for growth investments (and pressure from LPs to deploy) need to find places to put their money; watching what Big Tech hyperscalers are doing, investors see outsized AI companies as big and potentially lucrative bets to make.

Here’s a rundown of the biggest rounds in European AI this year, which reads like a who’s who of the biggest categories in AI right now:

Wayve: $1 billion

Going head-to-head with the likes of Tesla, GM, Intel and Alphabet takes very big money, and that is what Wayve has been raising. In May, the Cambridge, England-based startup closed on a cool $1.05 billion to double down on its autonomous driver technology, making it the largest single round for an AI company to date in the region. Similar to Intel’s Mobileye, Wayve sells its AI technology to a variety of carmakers and OEMs, rather than making the vehicles itself, which theoretically will give it a wider business funnel, as well as more operational focus for the startup.

But unlike a number of other self-driving companies, Wayve has “steered away” from having a primary reliance on costly lidar technology. The company is already rolling out services; one customer is U.K. grocery chain Asda. “Seven years ago, we started the company to go build an embodied AI,” Wayve co-founder and CEO Alex Kendall told TechCrunch. “We have been heads down building technology. What happened last year was everything really started to work.” Its investors include SoftBank, Nvidia, Microsoft and Meta’s head of AI, Yann LeCun.

Mistral: $650 million and $431 million

Mistral has shaped up to be one of the major players building large language models — the foundational block for generative AI applications — not just in Europe but globally. One of its unique selling points has been its embrace of open source, which theoretically makes its tech more customizable and thus enterprise- and developer-friendly.

So far, Mistral’s funding story has been a very “blustery” one: It launched with a $113 million seed round announcement barely a year ago. This year it’s collectively raised more than $1 billion, first in a tranche of $431 million and then a second round of $650 million (final close values), from an illustrious set of VC and tech and financial backers such as DST, Andreessen Horowitz, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Microsoft, Salesforce, BNP Paribas, CMA CGM and General Catalyst. Combining those rounds, it’s raised the most of any startup in AI so far this year in Europe. And if our sources are correct, it’s now working on raising even more.

Helsing: $484 million

Defense was one of the very earliest applications for AI back in the day, and now geopolitical events have put defense tech AI startups right back into the spotlight.

Helsing was founded in Germany, and its European roots have been pivotal to its development. It’s seen as a “home grown” solution, its existence representing more resilience in the European defense economy, helping countries in the region be less reliant on third parties outside of it. It’s announced a number of deals with specific nations, including Estonia and Germany, and it has a number more that it does not disclose.

Up to now, Helsing has focused primarily on software, one of its key missions being to build AI services that can link up and work with legacy infrastructure to improve defense systems, boost weapons capabilities, and provide better battle analytics for decision-making. Ukraine, and specifically the threat from Russia, has been a major fillip in its growth.

“Ukraine has used technology for its defense against the full-scale Russian invasion, and I think us being able to help there and deploy our technology and execute the mission we had set out three and a half years ago, to use AI to protect our democracies, has been a big driver for us,” Gundbert Scherf, Helsing’s co-chief executive officer, said in an interview with TechCrunch. With the $487 million it raised in July, it’s likely also to move into hardware, too. Its investors include General Catalyst, Prima Materia, Elad Gil, Accel, Saab, Lightspeed, Plural and Greenoaks.

Poolside: $400 million

Poolside’s focus first and foremost is on developers, specifically on building AI tools to help them speed up software development. While there are certainly a lot of startups also courting coders, investors are betting the founders here will have a special knack for product-market fit. CEO Jason Warner was the CTO of GitHub and led engineering for Heroku and Canonical. The other co-founder, CTO Eiso Kant, previously founded Athenian, which built a series of tools for developers to help them optimize how they build and work.

Like a number of other AI startups in Europe, Poolside is based out of Paris, and early backers included BCV; early-stage specialists like London’s Air Street, Abstraction and Scribble Ventures; New Wave and Frst from France; as well as Bpifrance, Felicis, Point Nine and Redpoint. This latest round of $400 million (that may be yet to close, or at least be disclosed) is reportedly being co-led by BCV and DST.

DeepL: $320 million

There are a number of companies — startups as well as major platform players like Google and Microsoft — that offer text translation and writing tools, but Germany-based DeepL thinks that its AI-based approach is simply better. It’s also taking a slightly different tack by focusing not on consumers but on the B2B/enterprise opportunity in the market.

It currently has around 100,000 business customers, and it announced a $320 million round in May of this year on a bet that it can scale that number. Its investors include ICONIQ Growth, Teachers’ Venture Growth, IVP, Atomico and WiL.

H: $220 million

H is for “heady,” which is what the AI market is these days. It is also the name of one of the companies proving out that statement. This startup, which used to be known as Holistic AI before it took a cryptic direction and shortened its name to H, raised this $220 million as a seed round in May.

It has yet to launch any products, but when it does, it sounds like its focus will be one of the other very popular applications for AI at the moment: AI agents. Specifically, it’s focused on “frontier action models to boost the productivity of workers,” according to its site. “Outrageous AI capabilities for task automation & decision-making.” No word yet on which verticals, which models, when it might launch, or what it might handle, nor what roles it’s looking to fill. Further, three of the outfit’s five co-founders have already left the company. Heady, indeed.

Flo Health: $200 million

Based out of London, Flo Health describes itself as the first “purely digital” (no hardware/wearable component) women’s health tracking app to have passed a $1 billion valuation when it raised $200 million earlier this year from General Atlantic. Its focus is currently around fertility and period tracking, but it has ambitions to extend that to older and younger users and to more categories of health. The company claims to have been utilized by a cumulative 380 million users to date, with 70 million monthly active users.

Pigment: $145 million

Another Parisian startup! Pigment is squarely in the area of enterprise software — specifically enterprise resource planning for finance teams. Like Flo Health, it’s not an AI startup per se, but it does lean on it for its functionality. As such, it’s part of the widening pool of AI applications that prove out the prediction that AI will eventually be part and parcel of all our digital services. Its $145 million round earlier this year, which came less than a year after its previous raise, gave Pigment a valuation of over $780 million.

A signage of Bharti Airtel Ltd

Apple strikes streaming deals to reach more users in India

A signage of Bharti Airtel Ltd

Image Credits: Pradeep Gaur / SOPA Images / LightRocket / Getty Images

Apple has struck a deal with Airtel to provide the Indian telecom giant’s subscribers with exclusive offers for its music streaming service. The partnership, announced on Tuesday, will also see Airtel bundle Apple TV+ for its premium customers in India, while simultaneously shuttering its own Wynk Music app.

Airtel customers who have subscribed to Airtel’s premium broadband and postpaid services will get Apple TV+ service included in their plans, the Indian firm said Tuesday. “Paying Wynk subscribers will gain access to additional offers,” Airtel said. The new changes will go live later this year.

Apple charges 99 Indian rupees ($1.2) monthly for Apple TV+ and Apple Music in India, compared to $10 and $11 in the U.S., respectively. A tie-up with Airtel will likely further lower the average revenue the company collects for Apple Music and TV+ in the world’s second-largest internet market. But the move is likely Apple’s attempt to reach more users in India, a country where more than 90% smartphones run Android. Apple Music and Apple TV+ are available on Android.

“We are thrilled that Airtel customers in India will soon be able to enjoy all of the incredible content on Apple TV+ and Apple Music,” said Oliver Schusser, Apple’s vice president of Apple Music, Apple TV+, Sports and Beats, in a statement. “With our ever growing catalog of world‐class films, television shows and music to choose from we know there will be something for everyone.”

An Airtel spokesperson separately said in a statement that Wynk Music employees will be moved to other parts of the Airtel business. Wynk is part of Airtel’s bouquet of complimentary services to its paying telecom subscribers. The app also offered a premium plan with additional features.

“Airtel customers will still have access to music streaming services through Apple Music. Moreover, Wynk Premium subscribers will receive exclusive offers from Airtel for Apple services,” the spokesperson added.

Airtel’s decision to shut down Wynk comes as a surprise as the music player wasn’t necessarily losing popularity, though its growth had slowed. According to brokerage firm UBS, Wynk Music made up roughly 5% of all music app downloads in the quarter ending June 2018. This figure increased to 8% for the same quarter this year, suggesting modest growth rather than decline. In the Asia Pacific region, Wynk Music had about 20% market share with downloads, according to Deutsche Bank.

However, music companies in India have struggled against international competitors like Spotify and Apple Music over the last several years. These global platforms provide their streaming services in India for as little as $1.2 to $1.3 per month.

Times Internet sold its music streaming service Gaana, which had raised over $200 million, to a subsidiary firm for less than $30,000.

Airtel and its main competitor Jio are bulking up their content and service bundles tied to telecom plans, aiming to attract high-value customers in India. Both companies offer various packages that include access to multiple streaming platforms alongside education and health services.

Illustration depicting OpenAI's logo over a flower

OpenAI's deals with publishers could spell trouble for rivals

Illustration depicting OpenAI's logo over a flower

Image Credits: Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch

OpenAI’s legal battle with The New York Times over data to train its AI models might still be brewing. But OpenAI’s forging ahead on deals with other publishers, including some of France’s and Spain’s largest news publishers.

OpenAI on Wednesday announced that it signed contracts with Le Monde and Prisa Media to bring French and Spanish news content to OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot. In a blog post, OpenAI said that the partnership will put the organizations’ current events coverage — from brands including El País, Cinco Días, As and El Huffpost — in front of ChatGPT users where it makes sense, as well as contribute to OpenAI’s ever-expanding volume of training data.

OpenAI writes:

Over the coming months, ChatGPT users will be able to interact with relevant news content from these publishers through select summaries with attribution and enhanced links to the original articles, giving users the ability to access additional information or related articles from their news sites … We are continually making improvements to ChatGPT and are supporting the essential role of the news industry in delivering real-time, authoritative information to users.

So, OpenAI’s revealed licensing deals with a handful of content providers at this point. Now felt like a good opportunity to take stock:

Stock media library Shutterstock (for images, videos and music training data)The Associated PressAxel Springer (owner of Politico and Business Insider, among others)Le MondePrisa Media

How much is OpenAI paying each? Well, it’s not saying — at least not publicly. But we can estimate.

The Information reported in January that OpenAI was offering publishers between $1 million and $5 million a year to access archives to train its GenAI models. That doesn’t tell us much about the Shutterstock partnership. But on the article licensing front — assuming The Information’s reporting is accurate and those figures haven’t changed since then — OpenAI’s shelling out between $4 million and $20 million a year for news.

That might be pennies to OpenAI, whose war chest sits at over $11 billion and whose annualized revenue recently topped $2 billion (per Financial Times). But as Hunter Walk, a partner at Homebrew and the co-founder of Screendoor, recently mused, it’s substantial enough to potentially edge out AI rivals also pursuing licensing agreements.

Walk writes on his blog:

[I]f experimentation is gated by nine figures worth of licensing deals, we are doing a disservice to innovation … The checks being cut to ‘owners’ of training data are creating a huge barrier to entry for challengers. If Google, OpenAI, and other large tech companies can establish a high enough cost, they implicitly prevent future competition.

Now, whether there’s a barrier to entry today is debatable. Many — if not most — AI vendors have chosen to risk the wrath of IP holders, opting not to license the data on which they’re training AI models. There’s evidence that art-generating platform Midjourney, for example, is training on Disney movie stills — and Midjourney has no deal with Disney.

The tougher question to wrestle with is: Should licensing simply be the cost of doing business and experimentation in the AI space?

Walk would argue not. He advocates for a regulator-imposed “safe harbor” that’d protect any AI vendor — as well as small-time startups and researchers — from legal liability so long as they abide by certain transparency and ethical standards.

Interestingly, the U.K. recently tried to codify something along those lines, exempting the use of text and data mining for AI training from copyright considerations so long as it’s for research purposes. But those efforts ended up falling through.

Me, I’m not sure I’d go so far as Walk in his “safe harbor” proposal considering the impact AI threatens to have on an already-destabilized news industry. A recent model from The Atlantic found that if a search engine like Google were to integrate AI into search, it’d answer a user’s query 75% of the time without requiring a click-through to its website.

But perhaps there is room for carve-outs.

Publishers should be paid — and paid fairly. Is there not an outcome, though, in which they’re paid and challengers to AI incumbents — as well as academics — get access to the same data as those incumbents? I should think so. Grants are one way. Larger VC checks are another.

I can’t say I have the solution, particularly given that the courts have yet to decide whether — and to what extent — fair use shields AI vendors from copyright claims. But it’s vital we tease these things out. Otherwise, the industry could well end up in a situation where academic “brain drain” continues unabated and only a few powerful companies have access to vast pools of valuable training sets.