Alpine Space Ventures closes first fund to grow the space economy on both sides of the pond

Alpine Space Ventures founders

Image Credits: Alpine Space Ventures (opens in a new window)

When early SpaceX engineer Bulent Altan and long-time investor Joram Voelklein surveyed the European space sector at the end of the 2010s, they were surprised: It looked a whole lot like the beginnings of American NewSpace in the early 2000s, when SpaceX and other companies were just setting up shop. 

The pair decided to go in early on a personal investment in German launch startup Isar Aerospace, but they also considered making a bigger play to more fully grasp the huge opportunity to help grow the space sector in both the U.S. and Europe. To do that, they established Alpine Space Ventures in Munich, Germany in 2020. Four years later, and after two years of fundraising, they closed their first $184 million (€170 million) fund — the largest first-time VC fund dedicated to space globally. 

Their LPs include more than 20 early SpaceX employees, as well as major institutions like the European Investment Fund, the NATO Innovation Fund and others. The capital is earmarked for no more than 10-15 investments (five of which have already been made), with check sizes up to $5.4 million (€5 million), with significant dry powder reserved for follow-on rounds. Around 70% of the fund is earmarked for European companies, but the firm is very much interested in both sides of the Atlantic, Altan said. 

The strong ties to SpaceX are evident in the firm’s philosophy, which Altan outlined in a recent interview. “We are very much aligned with what SpaceX has done, and we are investing in the wake of it,” he said. “SpaceX has opened up a huge satellite sector […] so you look at our portfolio, you see component builders, you see satellite builders, really people who are benefiting from SpaceX. We are staying away from the really long-term stuff, and we are probably staying away from direct competition to the 800-pound gorilla in the room, which is SpaceX.” 

Alpine’s thesis is that as the space industry grows, and as more non-space companies look to benefit from access to space, there will be less of a need for any particular space company to completely vertically integrate. Instead, a supply chain will grow, similar to that in the automotive industry. The firm sees telecommunications and Earth observation as two markets that will drive the demand for things like satellite buses and components. 

As it stands now, that portfolio consists of five companies (though the firm has received almost 1,000 pitches in the last two years, Voelklein said). They include K2 Space, a Los Angeles-based startup that has not been shy about its ambitions to build massive satellites for a Starship-enabled future, and German satellite builder Reflex Aerospace.

Voelklein credits much of the thesis to the team’s strong technical background: “We see missing links in the value chain,” he said. “That’s something that you only can do with this type of team.” The engineering-heavy background is evident: Alpine Space’s technical director is Catriona Chambers, an accomplished engineer whose 16-year stint at SpaceX included leading avionics for Starship, and its technical advisor is Hans Koenigsmann, who became the fourth technical employee of SpaceX in 2002. 

Despite its considerable advantages, space is a unique sector with its own particular challenges for venture investing. While many companies may promise large technical moats, valuable IP and lasting physical assets, identifying those that will close on a typical 10-year fund cycle can be difficult. 

Aligning technical promise and venture timelines “is the toughest part,” Altan said. “In order to do that, you have to come from the industry, you have to have understood where space is going. That’s why I think we were able to convince our investors to really go the distance with us.”

There are some aspects to NewSpace that have been normalized by SpaceX and others, but still might strike people as strange, if not downright irresponsible — like, for example, that a rocket blowing up in mid-air can still be cheered as a success, or that a first-time orbital demonstration of a novel satellite will more than likely have some hiccups. Part of Alpine’s job, both with politicians and prospective LPs, is educating them about the space industry’s new attitude of rapid hardware iteration. 

The other main hurdle for anyone investing in deep tech is the fact that companies often require a lot of upfront capital. Space startups in the U.S. often use funding vehicles offered by the Department of Defense and NASA to move their tech from R&D to MVP, and more mature companies (like SpaceX) have benefited from enormous contracts that help spur innovation and bring new capabilities to the nation. Europe is just starting to follow suit and it’s likely imperative for the indigenous space sector that it does. 

“Even though there is a partnership between U.S. and Europe — and we love that partnership — a good partnership also means being able to come also to the table with your own capabilities, and Europe is realizing that,” Altan said. 

It took longer than anticipated to close the fund, in part due to geopolitical events like the war in Ukraine and the end of the zero-interest rate phenomenon, Altan said. “But in the end, our target mark was always €160 million and we surpassed that. So it took longer than we thought, but it was also a good thing.”

CityRock launches second fund to back founders from diverse backgrounds

NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 17: Oliver Libby attends Resolve 2013 fundraising gala at The Harvard Club on October 17, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by John Lamparski/WireImage)

Image Credits: Oliver Libby by John Lamparski / Contributor / Getty Images

CityRock announced on Wednesday the close of a $24 million Fund II to invest in founders from diverse backgrounds. The fund, which is part of H/L Ventures, will seek to back companies in areas such as climate, healthcare and the future of work.

The firm has numerous legs to it, ranging from a venture studio to standard funds, where it does everything from co-founding companies to deploying capital. It has three funds within its venture studio and now two CityRock funds, which will focus on investing in Series A. It also has a seed program that supports pre-Series A companies within the wider H/L portfolio. 

The CityRock Funds focus on Series A investments, with CityRock Fund launching in late 2019. “It is part of H/L Ventures’ mission to provide a holistic platform of support and investment for our portfolio companies,” Oliver Libby, co-founder and managing partner of H/L Ventures, told TechCrunch. The average check size for CityRock Fund II will be $1 million, with a reserve for follow-on investments in the companies that were backed in CityRock Fund I. The fund is currently being deployed and expects to invest in 14 Series A companies and a similar amount of seed-stage companies through its seed program. 

Fund I was $17 million and closed in 2021. It is fully deployed and has backed 15 companies, including AndieSwim, Group Black and Aunt Flow. The firm says nearly 85% of the founders in the CityRock portfolio hail from what the firm describes as underrepresented backgrounds, but the firm defines it quite broadly, including identifiers like gender, race, socioeconomic background, sexual orientation, and military services. “Diversity is a strong preference for the fund, not a requirement, but the vast majority of our founding teams have underrepresented founder-CEO,” Libby said. 

He says that fundraising was challenging for the firm’s general partners. “Sufficient LPs did indeed back our strategy, which is to invest at the nexus of growth, impact and diversity,” he said, adding that there still seems to be an appetite for diversity within an investment strategy — especially with research showing that diverse founding teams lead to strong outcomes. “The situation has gotten more difficult, both because of the polarized climate and also because in challenging economic times, support for impact and diversity always tends to retreat.”

The firm remains focused on its commitment, though, saying that supporting diverse founders within the areas the fund wants to focus on — like healthcare and climate — is important for innovation. “Diverse founders often come from backgrounds that allow them to see or understand solutions that sometimes more privileged founders might miss,” Libby said, citing topics like energy efficiency in certain communities and health disparities. “We need innovations not just coming from the same old homogenous places, top-down into society, but also from every place within our society.” 

H/L was founded in 2009 by Eric Hatzimemos and Libby. Fund II will be deployed over a four-year period, the firm said. In the end, it hopes to back a diverse group of founders “with a positive mission” that can “lead to great financial success and good for society and the world.”

This story was updated to clarify the average check size of Fund II.

Siddhi Capital grabs $135M for Fund II to invest in consumer packaged goods startups

Crowd funding, new business or start up company to get money or venture capital to support or sponsor business concept, businessman hand giving money dollar coin to new business idea light bulb.

Image Credits: Getty Images

When Siddhi Capital’s Melissa Facchina started working in her family’s juice manufacturing businesses at a young age, she got hooked on how to be an efficient operator.

As she grew up, she saw how the food system was changing: More people starting to demand transparency in the supply chain and caring about better-quality ingredients and products.

“Big CPG (consumer packaged goods) wasn’t really solving for that, and I put my family business in the big CPG bucket by way of manufacturing,” Facchina said. 

She left the company in the early 2010s and launched her own company called Siddhi Services, which is an outsourced operating consultancy firm. It went on to be part of more than 500 food and beverage builds and part of 93 companies that successfully exited. 

Melissa Facchina, Siddhi Capital, CPG, venture capital
Melissa Facchina, co-founder and managing partner at Siddhi Capital.
Image Credits: Siddhi Capital

“We were basically ‘guns for hire,’ and would go into companies to solve scaling problems,” she said. “That got us a lot of attention with investors, and I started to realize what I thought was an unhealthy relationship forming between the investor and the investee.”

Facchina would see investors making what she thought were impractical demands on companies, for example, asking them to do something that they couldn’t do in timeframes that they couldn’t do it in. Mainly because the company didn’t know how to scale a CPG business, she explained.

When the desired outcomes didn’t materialize, the investor would ding the company’s valuation or want a change in management. What Facchina then saw were companies lying to their investors and boards because they were afraid of the outcome. She thought there might be a better way.

Enter Siddhi Capital, an operationally focused growth equity firm investing in the food and beverage industry. The firm’s portfolio includes brands like Aura Bora sparkling water, Thistle food delivery, chocolate snack company Mid-Day Squares and cereal maker Magic Spoon.

Facchina co-founded and shares a managing partner title with Steven Finn, who has led hundreds of investments through his family office. Together with a team of 24, the 4-year-old firm raised a nearly $70 million Fund I with the help of Finn’s father, Brian Finn, who is now Siddhi’s chairman. Previously, he was the former CEO of Credit Suisse USA.

Being an emerging fund manager has not been a picnic over the past four years. And for women-led funds, it’s even more difficult: Women-led funds’ share of total fundraising increased to about 3% of the $107 billion raised last year by venture funds worldwide, according to Venture Capital Journal.

Facchina didn’t have those challenges, though, because that first fund was closed in an hour. Yes, you read that right. She admits that much of that was due to Brian Finn’s influence and high-net-worth individual friends.

“I can’t say them by name, but some of the most notable personal investors in the world have invested in us,” she said. “I could never have done that on my own. The proof is in the pudding that when you marry two really good sets of skills together, people pay attention.”

Siddhi recently closed on a $135 million Fund II that didn’t take an hour to close. In fact, it took two years to close. However, roughly 98% of the limited partners reinvested in the second fund, Facchina said. 

Much of that was due to launching the fund just as the Ukraine war with Russia was happening. The firm “was very fortunate that our current investor group believed in what we were doing and was happy with the trajectory of Fund I,” though she didn’t think it would take two years.

The firm did invest during that time, adding 10 companies into the fund, including lab-grown protein ingredient company Ingrediome and recombinant protein producer Future Fields.

Siddhi Capital’s first fund went into 40 more early-stage companies, but Fund II will focus on deploying more money into fewer companies at a more growth equity stage. Facchina expects to invest $5 million to $10 million into companies making between $25 million and $100 million in revenue.

 A majority of the investments will go into consumer packaged goods companies and a small portion into food tech companies working in areas like fermentation and cellular agriculture.

Lucid pumps $1.5B from Saudi wealth fund after CEO warned relying on its 'bottomless wealth' was 'dangerous'

Lucid Air Sedan

Image Credits: Lucid Group

Saudi Arabia is committing even more money to Lucid Motors as the EV startup struggles to erase its losses. Lucid announced Monday as part of its second-quarter earnings report that an affiliate of the Saudi sovereign wealth fund is committing another $1.5 billion, with half coming in the form of a private placement and the other half as a loan facility.

The deal also further deepens the ties between Lucid and its majority owner, which has already committed to buying at least 50,000 of its EVs in the coming years, and is helping the company build a brand new factory in the Kingdom.

It’s the second time Lucid has turned to Saudi Arabia for more money since Lucid’s CEO Peter Rawlinson told the Financial Times in a March 2024 interview that he was wary of being over-reliant on the Kingdom’s sovereign wealth fund. “If I adopt a mindset that there is bottomless wealth from PIF, that is very dangerous, that is something I will never do, I respect them far too much for that,” he told the financial outlet.

The new funding comes as Lucid announced it lost $643 million in the second quarter of 2024, despite setting a new sales record for its electric luxury sedans that generated $200 million of revenue. Lucid reported it had $1.35 billion in cash and cash equivalents at the end of the second quarter.

Rawlinson described the injection of capital as a “resounding further endorsement” of Saudi Arabia’s long-term commitment in Lucid.

“We are so aligned, this transcends a mere financial arrangement,” Rawlinson said during the company’s earnings call Monday. “We are a cornerstone of the Saudi Arabia’s ambitious Vision 2030 to transition their company to add to a sustainable economy, and we are proud to participate in this.”

He also pushed back on the idea that Saudi Arabia’s interest was waning. “It’s often portrayed, how long is it before Saudi is going to get fed up with Peter playing with his cars?” he mused. “It’s not that, you know, we have regular dialogue. I have with my chairman [Turqi Alnowaiser] and we are absolutely both committed. You know, the dialogue is much more of ‘Peter keeps things on track. We want this midsize, we want these products. Is Gravity on track?’”

While Lucid’s total second-quarter revenue figures show year-over-year growth — on both a quarter and six-month time frame — a deeper dive into the result reveals Saudi Arabia’s influence.

On a regional basis, Lucid generated $155 million in North American sales in the second quarter, a 12% increase from the same period last year. Revenue from North American sales fell, however, when comparing results from the first six months of the year. Lucid reported $269.8 million in revenue from North America sales in the first six months of the year, a 5.7% decrease from the $286.2 million from the same six-month period in 2023.

Sales in Saudi Arabia is what helped close that gap. Revenue from sales in Saudi Arabia skyrocketed 14-fold to $95.2 million in the first six months of 2024 from the same period last year.

Lucid doesn’t just need money to staunch the bleeding as it tries to carve out a market for its luxury sedan, the Air. It also needs capital to help with the upcoming launch of its first electric SUV, known as Gravity. Lucid has said the Gravity will enter production by the end of 2024 and has put its hopes on it becoming a success in North America given the popularity of the form factor in the region. The company laid off about 400 employees, or roughly 6% of its workforce, in May 2024 as part of a restructuring ahead of the launch of the Gravity SUV.

Lucid pumps $1.5B from Saudi wealth fund after CEO warned relying on its 'bottomless wealth' was 'dangerous'

Lucid Air Sedan

Image Credits: Lucid Group

Saudi Arabia is committing even more money to Lucid Motors as the EV startup struggles to erase its losses. Lucid announced Monday as part of its second-quarter earnings report that an affiliate of the Saudi sovereign wealth fund is committing another $1.5 billion, with half coming in the form of a private placement and the other half as a loan facility.

The deal also further deepens the ties between Lucid and its majority owner, which has already committed to buying at least 50,000 of its EVs in the coming years, and is helping the company build a brand new factory in the Kingdom.

It’s the second time Lucid has turned to Saudi Arabia for more money since Lucid’s CEO Peter Rawlinson told the Financial Times in a March 2024 interview that he was wary of being over-reliant on the Kingdom’s sovereign wealth fund. “If I adopt a mindset that there is bottomless wealth from PIF, that is very dangerous, that is something I will never do, I respect them far too much for that,” he told the financial outlet.

The new funding comes as Lucid announced it lost $643 million in the second quarter of 2024, despite setting a new sales record for its electric luxury sedans that generated $200 million of revenue. Lucid reported it had $1.35 billion in cash and cash equivalents at the end of the second quarter.

Lucid doesn’t just need money to staunch the bleeding as it tries to carve out a market for its luxury sedan, the Air. It also needs capital to help with the upcoming launch of its first electric SUV, known as Gravity. Lucid has said the Gravity will enter production by the end of 2024 and has put its hopes on it becoming a success in North America given the popularity of the form factor in the region. The company laid off about 400 employees, or roughly 6% of its workforce, in May 2024 as part of a restructuring ahead of the launch of the Gravity SUV.

Siddhi Capital grabs $135M for Fund II to invest in consumer packaged goods startups

Crowd funding, new business or start up company to get money or venture capital to support or sponsor business concept, businessman hand giving money dollar coin to new business idea light bulb.

Image Credits: Getty Images

When Siddhi Capital’s Melissa Facchina started working in her family’s juice manufacturing businesses at a young age, she got hooked on how to be an efficient operator.

As she grew up, she saw how the food system was changing: More people starting to demand transparency in the supply chain and caring about better quality ingredients and products.

“Big CPG (consumer packaged goods) wasn’t really solving for that, and I put my family business in the big CPG bucket by way of manufacturing,” Facchina said. 

She left the company in the early 2010s and launched her own company called Siddhi Services, which is an outsourced operating consultancy firm. It went on to be part of more than 500 food and beverage builds and part of 93 companies that successfully exited. 

Melissa Facchina, Siddhi Capital, CPG, venture capital
Melissa Facchina, co-founder and managing partner at Siddhi Capital. (Image credit: Siddhi Capital)
Image Credits: Siddhi Capital /

“We were basically ‘guns for hire,’ and would go into companies to solve scaling problems,” she said. “That got us a lot of attention with investors, and I started to realize what I thought was an unhealthy relationship forming between the investor and the investee.”

Facchina would see investors making what she thought were impractical demands on companies, for example, asking them to do something that they couldn’t do in timeframes that they couldn’t do it in. Mainly because the company didn’t know how to scale a CPG business, she explained.

When the desired outcomes didn’t materialize, the investor would ding the company’s valuation or want a change in management. What Facchina then saw were companies lying to their investors and boards because they were afraid of the outcome. She thought there might be a better way.

Enter Siddhi Capital, an operationally focused growth equity firm investing in the food and beverage industry. The firm’s portfolio includes brands like Aura Bora sparkling water, Thistle food delivery, chocolate snack company Mid-Day Squares and cereal maker Magic Spoon.

Facchina co-founded and shares a managing partner title with Steven Finn, who has led hundreds of investments through his family office. Together with a team of 24, the 4-year-old firm raised a nearly $70 million Fund I with the help of Finn’s father, Brian Finn, who is now Siddhi’s chairman. Previously, he was the former CEO of Credit Suisse USA.

Being an emerging fund manager has not been a picnic over the past four years. And for women-led funds, it’s even more difficult: Women-led funds’ share of total fundraising increased to about 3% of the $107 billion raised last year by venture funds worldwide, according to Venture Capital Journal.

Facchina didn’t have those challenges, though, because that first fund was closed in an hour. Yes, you read that right. She admits that much of that was due to Brian Finn’s influence and high-net-worth individual friends.

“I can’t say them by name, but some of the most notable personal investors in the world have invested in us,” she said. “I could never have done that on my own. The proof is in the pudding that when you marry two really good sets of skills together, people pay attention.”

Siddhi recently closed on a $135 million Fund II that didn’t take an hour to close. In fact, it took two years to close. However, roughly 98% of the limited partners reinvested in the second fund, Facchina said. 

Much of that was due to launching the fund just as the Ukraine war with Russia was happening. The firm “was very fortunate that our current investor group believed in what we were doing and was happy with the trajectory of Fund I,” though she didn’t think it would take two years.

The firm did invest during that time, adding 10 companies into the fund, including lab-grown protein ingredient company Ingrediome and recombinant protein producer Future Fields, 

Siddhi Capital’s first fund went into 40 more early-stage companies, but Fund II will focus on deploying more money into fewer companies at a more growth equity stage. Facchina expects to invest $5 million to $10 million into companies making between $25 million and $100 million in revenue.

 A majority of the investments will go into consumer packaged goods companies and a small portion into food tech companies working in areas like fermentation and cellular agriculture.

What StepStone's $3.3B venture secondaries fund tells us about LPs' current appetite for venture

venture secondaries, StepStone

Image Credits: Nuthawut Somsuk / Getty Images

StepStone raised the largest fund dedicated to investing in venture secondaries ever, the firm announced last week. This fundraise doesn’t just say a lot about StepStone’s venture secondaries investing prowess, but also about how LPs are thinking about the current venture market.

The fund, StepStone VC Secondaries Fund VI, raised $3.3 billion. This marks a big step up from the fund’s predecessor, which closed on $2.6 billion, a record size at the time, in 2022. Fund VI was raised from both existing and new LPs and was oversubscribed, according to StepStone.

Secondaries funds like StepStone’s buy existing investor equity stakes in both individual startups, known as direct secondaries, and LP stakes in venture funds. Direct secondaries allow LPs access to startup stakes in already successful companies nearing an exit, which means less risk and less time to reward.

This record-setting fund comes at a time when venture fundraising is down sharply. In 2023, venture funds raised $66.9 billion, according to PitchBook data. That marks a 61% decrease from 2022 when funds closed on a record-breaking $172.8 billion.

While the negative overall venture fundraising numbers may imply that LPs are less interested in investing in startups, Brian Borton, a VC and growth equity partner at StepStone, told TechCrunch he doesn’t think that’s necessarily true. He thinks LPs are still just as interested, but after the wild valuations of 2020 and 2021, many of which have evaporated now, they are looking for venture strategies that return results faster and with less risk.

“LPs’ interest level in venture capital continues to be strong,” Borton said. “A lot of LPs are looking for broader or more differentiated ways of building their venture exposure and I think secondaries as a method of building that exposure certainly resonated.”

He added LPs are looking for ways to invest in venture-backed companies without as long of a holding period too. VCs, especially those that invest at the early stages, hold investments the longest of any private asset class.

“A lot of LPs learned the lesson that you can’t time the venture capital market,” Borton said. “There continues to be this institutional commitment to the asset class that we haven’t necessarily seen in past cycles. LPs aren’t throwing in the towel, they are just being more selective in who they are backing and making sure they are doing it in the right way.”

This fundraise also shows what LPs are thinking about the primary late-stage market too. LPs may be choosing to back a secondaries vehicle over a traditional late-stage or growth-stage focused fund because of price. Median late-stage valuations actually have risen since their initial decline when the market cooled in 2022, according to PitchBook data. Meanwhile, many secondaries deals still trade at a discount, according to data from secondaries deal tracking platform Caplight.

This fund close, and what it says about LP interest in late-stage startups and venture secondaries, should be good news to VCs. Many VCs are looking for liquidity in a still quiet exit market and while investors and startups want to sell stakes not every investor is allowed to buy.

Venture firms, unless they are registered investment advisors, can only hold up to 20% of their portfolio in secondary stakes, per SEC requirements. This means that there aren’t a ton of buyers for these secondary stakes outside of dedicated secondaries funds, hedge funds and crossover investors like Fidelity and T. Rowe Price.

Borton said that $3.3 billion is actually a small fund when you look at the potential size of the venture secondaries market, which continues to grow as startups continue to stay private for longer.

“We have the largest fund but we truly believe that is still undersized relative to the market opportunity in front of us,” Borton said. “This allows to be very selective in what we choose and transact on.”

Venture secondaries activity is up this year compared to last. Javier Avalos, the co-founder and CEO of Caplight, told TechCrunch that its platform has tracked $600 million of transaction volume so far this year, which represents a 50% increase over yearly activity at this time in 2023.

“What’s encouraging is that the pickup in volume is coming from both an increase in the number of trades closed and an increase in the average trade size,” Avalos told TechCrunch over email. “In Q2 of 2023, the average closed secondary trade size we observed was $1 million. We’ve seen almost double the closed trade size this quarter, indicating more institutional investor buyers are active in the market, as these funds typically participate in larger deals than individual investors would.”

If LPs are increasingly interested in the venture secondaries space, and trading volume continues to increase, Borton might be right that while StepStone’s $3.3 billion fund is the largest now, the market has room for more funds of that size or greater. StepStone’s fund may not be the largest fund for long.

As Spain gets its latest VC fund, Southern Europe appears to be on a roll

Enrique Linares and Oriol Juncosa, founders, Plus Partners

Image Credits: Plus Partners / Enrique Linares and Oriol Juncosa, founders, Plus Partners

While startup valuations have plummeted since the bull run of 2021-2022, a factor that’s hit the European startup ecosystem particularly hard, there’s one region of Europe where the correction has slightly worked in its favor: the South.

Evidence for this was apparent during Mobile World Congress in Barcelona earlier this year, as time and time again your TechCrunch reporter bumped into Northern European VCs scouting startups on the “Iberian peninsula” (Spain and Portugal). These young companies bring a killer combination that VCs love: significantly lower operating costs and far less punchy valuations.

Further evidence of this “Southern trend” arrives with news that a new venture capital fund, Plus Partners, is being launched by Enrique Linares, one of the co-founders of breakout European unicorn letgo, and Oriol Juncosa, a veteran of the Barcelona VC scene. While Plus Partners hasn’t released a figure for the launch of their new fund, the rumor I’m hearing is it will be in the $30 million-$50 million range.

Looking at the fund’s co-founders, Linares led letgo, a used goods marketplace, to become the first Spanish startup to achieve unicorn status, attracting investment from Accel, Insight Partners and Prosus, among others. Prior to letgo, he co-founded Captalis, a fintech company with a significant presence in LatAm.

Juncosa started his VC career at Nauta Capital in Barcelona and went on to co-found the early-stage VC firm Encomenda Smart Capital. He then become CFO of Carto, a data visualization SaaS company based in the U.S. and Spain, which has raised more than $100 million. As an investor/shareholder he’s invested in more than 75 startups — such as Carto, Cobee (which exited to Pluxee), Holded and Housfy, among others. 

So what’s the Plus Partners thesis? It will concentrate on “health and nutrition,” “finance and property” and “future of work and productivity,” per Juncosa. The fund will focus on pre-seed and seed-stage startups in Southern Europe with a significant percentage of them coming from Spain. 

Juncosa told me the fund is backed by founders and former C-Level execs drawn from companies including Carto, Luzia, Kantox, Red Points and Typeform, among others.

He said he thinks Spain and Portugal sorely need more professionally run VC funds because too many early-stage investors, especially non-professional angels and family offices, tend to “do more harm than good” in the nascent tech scene there, because they either blow up valuations excessively or enter rounds on punitive terms to the founders.

“The big news in Spain for me is that we have role models. Also the tech community in Spain and Portugal is extremely open, everybody’s happy to support everybody,” he told TechCrunch over a call. 

Which country does the new fund think is “hotter” in terms of startups? “I would say, overall, we have three great entrepreneurial cities in Barcelona, Madrid and Lisbon. If you went back 10 years, Barcelona was the biggest tech city. But Lisbon and Madrid have played catch-up very well. Now, entrepreneurs have a choice of where they want to set up their company.”

Linares reiterated that Southern Europe is now “packed” with entrepreneurs who are role models for new startup founders, emphasizing: “We have a lot of talent and founders can internationalize very successful startups from here.”

“Barcelona and Madrid are on a par with each other as ecosystems, but Valencia is growing,” he added. “There is a summit in October that is called Valencia Digital Summit. We were speakers last a year and it was fantastic. I was very surprised. It was my first time there.” 

The fund will also look at startups coming out of Italy, completing its “Southern Europe” thesis. 

“We’ll have a significant share of our investments in Spain, but, within [Southern Europe], Italy is greatly overlooked. Rome and Milan are catching up. We’re very excited about it,” said Linares.

Plus Partners arrives at a time when VCs are dialing up their attention on Southern Europe. 

Yellow, a new VC firm created by Oscar Pierre, Sacha Michaud (the founders of Glovo) and Adam Lasri (a former investor for VC giant Atomico), recently put their bets on the region, with a €30 million fund raised in less than five months.

Furthermore, Spanish VC Kfund raised $75 million to fund tech projects earlier this year. 

According to a Dealroom report on the Spanish tech ecosystem, the combined enterprise value of Spanish startups surpassed €100 billion in 2023. It also found venture investment into Spanish startups held up last year, with €2.2 billion raised across some 850 funding rounds. 

The annual “State of European Tech” report for 2023 found Spain’s ecosystem to be in fourth place overall and had the highest number of startup fundings last year.

Lastly, the European Investment Bank’s venture capital arm also backed a new fund in Spain this year which aims to invest €1 billion ($1.1 billion) in growth-stage tech startups. 

Anthropic looks to fund a new, more comprehensive generation of AI benchmarks

Anthropic Claude 3.5 logo

Image Credits: Anthropic

Anthropic is launching a program to fund the development of new types of benchmarks capable of evaluating the performance and impact of AI models, including generative models like its own Claude.

Unveiled on Monday, Anthropic’s program will dole out payments to third-party organizations that can, as the company puts it in a blog post, “effectively measure advanced capabilities in AI models.” Those interested can submit applications to be evaluated on a rolling basis.

“Our investment in these evaluations is intended to elevate the entire field of AI safety, providing valuable tools that benefit the whole ecosystem,” Anthropic wrote on its official blog. “Developing high-quality, safety-relevant evaluations remains challenging, and the demand is outpacing the supply.”

As we’ve highlighted before, AI has a benchmarking problem. The most commonly cited benchmarks for AI today do a poor job of capturing how the average person actually uses the systems being tested. There are also questions as to whether some benchmarks, particularly those released before the dawn of modern generative AI, even measure what they purport to measure, given their age.

The very-high-level, harder-than-it-sounds solution Anthropic is proposing is creating challenging benchmarks with a focus on AI security and societal implications via new tools, infrastructure and methods.

The company calls specifically for tests that assess a model’s ability to accomplish tasks like carrying out cyberattacks, “enhance” weapons of mass destruction (e.g. nuclear weapons) and manipulate or deceive people (e.g. through deepfakes or misinformation). For AI risks pertaining to national security and defense, Anthropic says it’s committed to developing an “early warning system” of sorts for identifying and assessing risks, although it doesn’t reveal in the blog post what such a system might entail.

Anthropic also says it intends its new program to support research into benchmarks and “end-to-end” tasks that probe AI’s potential for aiding in scientific study, conversing in multiple languages and mitigating ingrained biases, as well as self-censoring toxicity.

To achieve all this, Anthropic envisions new platforms that allow subject-matter experts to develop their own evaluations and large-scale trials of models involving “thousands” of users. The company says it’s hired a full-time coordinator for the program and that it might purchase or expand projects it believes have the potential to scale.

“We offer a range of funding options tailored to the needs and stage of each project,” Anthropic writes in the post, though an Anthropic spokesperson declined to provide any further details about those options. “Teams will have the opportunity to interact directly with Anthropic’s domain experts from the frontier red team, fine-tuning, trust and safety and other relevant teams.”

Anthropic’s effort to support new AI benchmarks is a laudable one — assuming, of course, there’s sufficient cash and manpower behind it. But given the company’s commercial ambitions in the AI race, it might be a tough one to completely trust.

In the blog post, Anthropic is rather transparent about the fact that it wants certain evaluations it funds to align with the AI safety classifications it developed (with some input from third parties like the nonprofit AI research org METR). That’s well within the company’s prerogative. But it may also force applicants to the program into accepting definitions of “safe” or “risky” AI that they might not agree with.

A portion of the AI community is also likely to take issue with Anthropic’s references to “catastrophic” and “deceptive” AI risks, like nuclear weapons risks. Many experts say there’s little evidence to suggest AI as we know it will gain world-ending, human-outsmarting capabilities anytime soon, if ever. Claims of imminent “superintelligence” serve only to draw attention away from the pressing AI regulatory issues of the day, like AI’s hallucinatory tendencies, these experts add.

In its post, Anthropic writes that it hopes its program will serve as “a catalyst for progress towards a future where comprehensive AI evaluation is an industry standard.” That’s a mission the many open, corporate-unaffiliated efforts to create better AI benchmarks can identify with. But it remains to be seen whether those efforts are willing to join forces with an AI vendor whose loyalty ultimately lies with shareholders.

Why most AI benchmarks tell us so little

Industry Ventures raises a $900M fund for investing in small, early-stage VCs and their breakout startups

illustration of money raining down

Image Credits: Bryce Durbin / TechCrunch

The venture fundraising trend in 2024 is fairly clear by now: Large, established VC firms are continuing to attract capital from limited partners, while smaller, newer funds are finding it more difficult to raise. 

But Industry Ventures’ latest fundraise should offer a dash of good news for emerging managers.

On Tuesday, the 24-year-old firm announced that it raised a $900 million early-stage hybrid fund for investing in emerging managers and directly backing breakout growth-stage companies alongside their managers. The fund will also buy a secondary interest in emerging managers from other limited partners.

This is Industry Ventures’ seventh hybrid fund, and it’s more than 50% larger than its predecessor, a $575 million vehicle raised in 2021.

The $900 million fund will be split three ways: backing VC funds (40%), directly investing in promising Series B startups from their existing partnerships (40%) and acquiring stakes in emerging investment firms from other LPs looking to exit (20%).

The common lore is that it’s very challenging for emerging managers to raise funds now, but Roland Reynolds, senior managing director at Industry Ventures, says that is not what he observes with the funds his firm backs.

Roland Reynolds, Industry Ventures
Roland Reynolds
Image Credits: Industry Ventures

“We’ve seen the vast majority of our managers are getting their funds done,” he said. “It might take them a quarter or two longer, but most are [raising] larger fund sizes.”

Part of Industry’s secret may be that not all VCs the firm backs fit the standard definition of emerging managers.

While Industry Ventures’ new relationships are usually firms on funds I through III, it will continue to invest in managers as they mature, as long as their fund sizes are $250 million or less and focused on seed and Series A startups, Reynolds said. These managers include firms that have been around for over a decade, including IA Ventures and Altos Ventures.

In addition to backing more-established small managers, Reynolds said it’s a good time to invest in new funds started by experienced investors who are leaving large firms.  

As for direct investments, Reynolds said the firm is looking to back the best Series B companies sourced from its manager relationships. Some of the firm’s most recent deals include online banking and money management platform Relay and robotics company Cobot. Industry Ventures checks invested directly into companies range from $2 million to $12 million.

Industry Ventures was founded in 2000 by Hans Swildens. The firm is best known as a secondaries VC investor. The latest hybrid fund brings Industry Ventures’ total assets under management to over $8 billion.