Alpine Space Ventures closes first fund to grow the space economy on both sides of the pond

Alpine Space Ventures founders

Image Credits: Alpine Space Ventures (opens in a new window)

When early SpaceX engineer Bulent Altan and long-time investor Joram Voelklein surveyed the European space sector at the end of the 2010s, they were surprised: It looked a whole lot like the beginnings of American NewSpace in the early 2000s, when SpaceX and other companies were just setting up shop. 

The pair decided to go in early on a personal investment in German launch startup Isar Aerospace, but they also considered making a bigger play to more fully grasp the huge opportunity to help grow the space sector in both the U.S. and Europe. To do that, they established Alpine Space Ventures in Munich, Germany in 2020. Four years later, and after two years of fundraising, they closed their first $184 million (€170 million) fund — the largest first-time VC fund dedicated to space globally. 

Their LPs include more than 20 early SpaceX employees, as well as major institutions like the European Investment Fund, the NATO Innovation Fund and others. The capital is earmarked for no more than 10-15 investments (five of which have already been made), with check sizes up to $5.4 million (€5 million), with significant dry powder reserved for follow-on rounds. Around 70% of the fund is earmarked for European companies, but the firm is very much interested in both sides of the Atlantic, Altan said. 

The strong ties to SpaceX are evident in the firm’s philosophy, which Altan outlined in a recent interview. “We are very much aligned with what SpaceX has done, and we are investing in the wake of it,” he said. “SpaceX has opened up a huge satellite sector […] so you look at our portfolio, you see component builders, you see satellite builders, really people who are benefiting from SpaceX. We are staying away from the really long-term stuff, and we are probably staying away from direct competition to the 800-pound gorilla in the room, which is SpaceX.” 

Alpine’s thesis is that as the space industry grows, and as more non-space companies look to benefit from access to space, there will be less of a need for any particular space company to completely vertically integrate. Instead, a supply chain will grow, similar to that in the automotive industry. The firm sees telecommunications and Earth observation as two markets that will drive the demand for things like satellite buses and components. 

As it stands now, that portfolio consists of five companies (though the firm has received almost 1,000 pitches in the last two years, Voelklein said). They include K2 Space, a Los Angeles-based startup that has not been shy about its ambitions to build massive satellites for a Starship-enabled future, and German satellite builder Reflex Aerospace.

Voelklein credits much of the thesis to the team’s strong technical background: “We see missing links in the value chain,” he said. “That’s something that you only can do with this type of team.” The engineering-heavy background is evident: Alpine Space’s technical director is Catriona Chambers, an accomplished engineer whose 16-year stint at SpaceX included leading avionics for Starship, and its technical advisor is Hans Koenigsmann, who became the fourth technical employee of SpaceX in 2002. 

Despite its considerable advantages, space is a unique sector with its own particular challenges for venture investing. While many companies may promise large technical moats, valuable IP and lasting physical assets, identifying those that will close on a typical 10-year fund cycle can be difficult. 

Aligning technical promise and venture timelines “is the toughest part,” Altan said. “In order to do that, you have to come from the industry, you have to have understood where space is going. That’s why I think we were able to convince our investors to really go the distance with us.”

There are some aspects to NewSpace that have been normalized by SpaceX and others, but still might strike people as strange, if not downright irresponsible — like, for example, that a rocket blowing up in mid-air can still be cheered as a success, or that a first-time orbital demonstration of a novel satellite will more than likely have some hiccups. Part of Alpine’s job, both with politicians and prospective LPs, is educating them about the space industry’s new attitude of rapid hardware iteration. 

The other main hurdle for anyone investing in deep tech is the fact that companies often require a lot of upfront capital. Space startups in the U.S. often use funding vehicles offered by the Department of Defense and NASA to move their tech from R&D to MVP, and more mature companies (like SpaceX) have benefited from enormous contracts that help spur innovation and bring new capabilities to the nation. Europe is just starting to follow suit and it’s likely imperative for the indigenous space sector that it does. 

“Even though there is a partnership between U.S. and Europe — and we love that partnership — a good partnership also means being able to come also to the table with your own capabilities, and Europe is realizing that,” Altan said. 

It took longer than anticipated to close the fund, in part due to geopolitical events like the war in Ukraine and the end of the zero-interest rate phenomenon, Altan said. “But in the end, our target mark was always €160 million and we surpassed that. So it took longer than we thought, but it was also a good thing.”

CityRock launches second fund to back founders from diverse backgrounds

NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 17: Oliver Libby attends Resolve 2013 fundraising gala at The Harvard Club on October 17, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by John Lamparski/WireImage)

Image Credits: Oliver Libby by John Lamparski / Contributor / Getty Images

CityRock announced on Wednesday the close of a $24 million Fund II to invest in founders from diverse backgrounds. The fund, which is part of H/L Ventures, will seek to back companies in areas such as climate, healthcare and the future of work.

The firm has numerous legs to it, ranging from a venture studio to standard funds, where it does everything from co-founding companies to deploying capital. It has three funds within its venture studio and now two CityRock funds, which will focus on investing in Series A. It also has a seed program that supports pre-Series A companies within the wider H/L portfolio. 

The CityRock Funds focus on Series A investments, with CityRock Fund launching in late 2019. “It is part of H/L Ventures’ mission to provide a holistic platform of support and investment for our portfolio companies,” Oliver Libby, co-founder and managing partner of H/L Ventures, told TechCrunch. The average check size for CityRock Fund II will be $1 million, with a reserve for follow-on investments in the companies that were backed in CityRock Fund I. The fund is currently being deployed and expects to invest in 14 Series A companies and a similar amount of seed-stage companies through its seed program. 

Fund I was $17 million and closed in 2021. It is fully deployed and has backed 15 companies, including AndieSwim, Group Black and Aunt Flow. The firm says nearly 85% of the founders in the CityRock portfolio hail from what the firm describes as underrepresented backgrounds, but the firm defines it quite broadly, including identifiers like gender, race, socioeconomic background, sexual orientation, and military services. “Diversity is a strong preference for the fund, not a requirement, but the vast majority of our founding teams have underrepresented founder-CEO,” Libby said. 

He says that fundraising was challenging for the firm’s general partners. “Sufficient LPs did indeed back our strategy, which is to invest at the nexus of growth, impact and diversity,” he said, adding that there still seems to be an appetite for diversity within an investment strategy — especially with research showing that diverse founding teams lead to strong outcomes. “The situation has gotten more difficult, both because of the polarized climate and also because in challenging economic times, support for impact and diversity always tends to retreat.”

The firm remains focused on its commitment, though, saying that supporting diverse founders within the areas the fund wants to focus on — like healthcare and climate — is important for innovation. “Diverse founders often come from backgrounds that allow them to see or understand solutions that sometimes more privileged founders might miss,” Libby said, citing topics like energy efficiency in certain communities and health disparities. “We need innovations not just coming from the same old homogenous places, top-down into society, but also from every place within our society.” 

H/L was founded in 2009 by Eric Hatzimemos and Libby. Fund II will be deployed over a four-year period, the firm said. In the end, it hopes to back a diverse group of founders “with a positive mission” that can “lead to great financial success and good for society and the world.”

This story was updated to clarify the average check size of Fund II.

CityRock launches second fund to back founders from diverse backgrounds

NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 17: Oliver Libby attends Resolve 2013 fundraising gala at The Harvard Club on October 17, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by John Lamparski/WireImage)

Image Credits: John Lamparski / Contributor / Getty Images

CityRock announced on Wednesday the close of a $24 million Fund II to invest in founders from diverse backgrounds. The fund, which is part of H/L Ventures, will seek to back companies in areas such as climate, healthcare and the future of work.

The firm has numerous legs to it, ranging from a venture studio to standard funds, where it does everything from co-founding companies to deploying capital. It has three funds within its venture studio and now two CityRock funds, which will focus on investing in Series A. It also has a seed program that supports pre-Series A companies within the wider H/L portfolio. 

The CityRock Funds focus on Series A investments, with CityRock Fund launching in late 2019. “It is part of H/L Ventures’ mission to provide a holistic platform of support and investment for our portfolio companies,” Oliver Libby, co-founder and managing partner of H/L Ventures, told TechCrunch. The average check size for CityRock Fund II will be $1 million, with a reserve for follow-on investments in the companies that were backed in CityRock Fund I. The fund is currently being deployed and expects to invest in 14 Series A companies and a similar amount of seed-stage companies through its seed program. 

Fund I was $17 million and closed in 2021. It is fully deployed and has backed 15 companies, including AndieSwim, Group Black and Aunt Flow. The firm says nearly 85% of the founders in the CityRock portfolio hail from what the firm describes as underrepresented backgrounds, but the firm defines it quite broadly, including identifiers like gender, race, socioeconomic background, sexual orientation, and military services. “Diversity is a strong preference for the fund, not a requirement, but the vast majority of our founding teams have underrepresented founder-CEO,” Libby said. 

He says that fundraising was challenging for the firm’s general partners. “Sufficient LPs did indeed back our strategy, which is to invest at the nexus of growth, impact and diversity,” he said, adding that there still seems to be an appetite for diversity within an investment strategy — especially with research showing that diverse founding teams lead to strong outcomes. “The situation has gotten more difficult, both because of the polarized climate and also because in challenging economic times, support for impact and diversity always tends to retreat.”

The firm remains focused on its commitment, though, saying that supporting diverse founders within the areas the fund wants to focus on — like healthcare and climate — is important for innovation. “Diverse founders often come from backgrounds that allow them to see or understand solutions that sometimes more privileged founders might miss,” Libby said, citing topics like energy efficiency in certain communities and health disparities. “We need innovations not just coming from the same old homogenous places, top-down into society, but also from every place within our society.” 

H/L was founded in 2009 by Eric Hatzimemos and Libby. Fund II will be deployed over a four-year period, the firm said. In the end, it hopes to back a diverse group of founders “with a positive mission” that can “lead to great financial success and good for society and the world.”

This story was updated to clarify the average check size of Fund II.

illustration of money raining down

Industry Ventures raises a $900M fund for investing in small, early-stage VCs and their breakout startups

illustration of money raining down

Image Credits: Bryce Durbin / TechCrunch

The venture fundraising trend in 2024 is fairly clear by now: Large, established VC firms are continuing to attract capital from limited partners, while smaller, newer funds are finding it more difficult to raise. 

But Industry Ventures’ latest fundraise should offer a dash of good news for emerging managers.

On Tuesday, the 24-year-old firm announced that it raised a $900 million early-stage hybrid fund for investing in emerging managers and directly backing breakout growth-stage companies alongside their managers. The fund will also buy a secondary interest in emerging managers from other limited partners.

This is Industry Ventures’ seventh hybrid fund, and it’s more than 50% larger than its predecessor, a $575 million vehicle raised in 2021.

The $900 million fund will be split three ways: backing VC funds (40%), directly investing in promising Series B startups from their existing partnerships (40%) and acquiring stakes in emerging investment firms from other LPs looking to exit (20%).

The common lore is that it’s very challenging for emerging managers to raise funds now, but Roland Reynolds, senior managing director at Industry Ventures, says that is not what he observes with the funds his firm backs.

Roland Reynolds, Industry Ventures
Roland Reynolds
Image Credits: Industry Ventures

“We’ve seen the vast majority of our managers are getting their funds done,” he said. “It might take them a quarter or two longer, but most are [raising] larger fund sizes.”

Part of Industry’s secret may be that not all VCs the firm backs fit the standard definition of emerging managers.

While Industry Ventures’ new relationships are usually firms on funds I through III, it will continue to invest in managers as they mature, as long as their fund sizes are $250 million or less and focused on seed and Series A startups, Reynolds said. These managers include firms that have been around for over a decade, including IA Ventures and Altos Ventures.

In addition to backing more-established small managers, Reynolds said it’s a good time to invest in new funds started by experienced investors who are leaving large firms.  

As for direct investments, Reynolds said the firm is looking to back the best Series B companies sourced from its manager relationships. Some of the firm’s most recent deals include online banking and money management platform Relay and robotics company Cobot. Industry Ventures checks invested directly into companies range from $2 million to $12 million.

Industry Ventures was founded in 2000 by Hans Swildens. The firm is best known as a secondaries VC investor. The latest hybrid fund brings Industry Ventures’ total assets under management to over $8 billion.

Anthropic looks to fund a new, more comprehensive generation of AI benchmarks

Anthropic Claude 3.5 logo

Image Credits: Anthropic

Anthropic is launching a program to fund the development of new types of benchmarks capable of evaluating the performance and impact of AI models, including generative models like its own Claude.

Unveiled on Monday, Anthropic’s program will dole out payments to third-party organizations that can, as the company puts it in a blog post, “effectively measure advanced capabilities in AI models.” Those interested can submit applications to be evaluated on a rolling basis.

“Our investment in these evaluations is intended to elevate the entire field of AI safety, providing valuable tools that benefit the whole ecosystem,” Anthropic wrote on its official blog. “Developing high-quality, safety-relevant evaluations remains challenging, and the demand is outpacing the supply.”

As we’ve highlighted before, AI has a benchmarking problem. The most commonly cited benchmarks for AI today do a poor job of capturing how the average person actually uses the systems being tested. There are also questions as to whether some benchmarks, particularly those released before the dawn of modern generative AI, even measure what they purport to measure, given their age.

The very-high-level, harder-than-it-sounds solution Anthropic is proposing is creating challenging benchmarks with a focus on AI security and societal implications via new tools, infrastructure and methods.

The company calls specifically for tests that assess a model’s ability to accomplish tasks like carrying out cyberattacks, “enhance” weapons of mass destruction (e.g. nuclear weapons) and manipulate or deceive people (e.g. through deepfakes or misinformation). For AI risks pertaining to national security and defense, Anthropic says it’s committed to developing an “early warning system” of sorts for identifying and assessing risks, although it doesn’t reveal in the blog post what such a system might entail.

Anthropic also says it intends its new program to support research into benchmarks and “end-to-end” tasks that probe AI’s potential for aiding in scientific study, conversing in multiple languages and mitigating ingrained biases, as well as self-censoring toxicity.

To achieve all this, Anthropic envisions new platforms that allow subject-matter experts to develop their own evaluations and large-scale trials of models involving “thousands” of users. The company says it’s hired a full-time coordinator for the program and that it might purchase or expand projects it believes have the potential to scale.

“We offer a range of funding options tailored to the needs and stage of each project,” Anthropic writes in the post, though an Anthropic spokesperson declined to provide any further details about those options. “Teams will have the opportunity to interact directly with Anthropic’s domain experts from the frontier red team, fine-tuning, trust and safety and other relevant teams.”

Anthropic’s effort to support new AI benchmarks is a laudable one — assuming, of course, there’s sufficient cash and manpower behind it. But given the company’s commercial ambitions in the AI race, it might be a tough one to completely trust.

In the blog post, Anthropic is rather transparent about the fact that it wants certain evaluations it funds to align with the AI safety classifications it developed (with some input from third parties like the nonprofit AI research org METR). That’s well within the company’s prerogative. But it may also force applicants to the program into accepting definitions of “safe” or “risky” AI that they might not agree with.

A portion of the AI community is also likely to take issue with Anthropic’s references to “catastrophic” and “deceptive” AI risks, like nuclear weapons risks. Many experts say there’s little evidence to suggest AI as we know it will gain world-ending, human-outsmarting capabilities anytime soon, if ever. Claims of imminent “superintelligence” serve only to draw attention away from the pressing AI regulatory issues of the day, like AI’s hallucinatory tendencies, these experts add.

In its post, Anthropic writes that it hopes its program will serve as “a catalyst for progress towards a future where comprehensive AI evaluation is an industry standard.” That’s a mission the many open, corporate-unaffiliated efforts to create better AI benchmarks can identify with. But it remains to be seen whether those efforts are willing to join forces with an AI vendor whose loyalty ultimately lies with shareholders.

Why most AI benchmarks tell us so little

Thomvest Ventures, Don Butler, Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake

Thomvest Ventures closes $250M fund to invest across fintech, cybersecurity, AI

Thomvest Ventures, Don Butler, Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake

Image Credits: Thomvest Ventures / Thomvest Ventures' managing directors, from left, Don Butler, Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake

Thomvest Ventures is popping into 2024 with a new $250 million fund and the promotion of Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake to the role of managing directors.

The Bay Area venture capital firm was started about 25 years ago by Peter Thomson, whose family is the majority owners of Thomson Reuters.

“Peter has always had a very strong interest in technology and what technology would do in terms of shaping society and the future,” Don Butler, Thomvest Ventures’ managing director, told TechCrunch. He met Thomson in 1999 and joined the firm in 2000.

As we’ve seen over the past few years, the venture capital industry can’t help but be cyclical. Thomvest has watched it for decades, and in 2010 decided to leave the generalist world behind to specialize in investment in a few key industries, Butler said.

“For example, every time a specialist in cybersecurity would speak, you knew that this was somebody who knew the market intimately, knew our competition, knew the customers, knew the market demand,” Butler said. “And we were like, ‘Okay, we want to be like them.’”

AI startup Cohere, now valued at over $2.1B, raises $270M

Today, Thomvest Ventures deploys capital in the areas of financial and real estate technology, cybersecurity, cloud and AI/data infrastructure.

The new $250 million in capital commitments brings the firm’s total assets under management to $750 million.

Butler expects to invest in between 25 and 30 companies from the new fund. Check sizes will be $5 million to $15 million for early-stage and $7 million to $25 million in the later stage. Thomson has made a few investments so far, but they haven’t been made public yet, he said.

“The last two quarters have yielded record numbers of new prospects for us,” Butler said. “At a later stage the best companies were able to get to some form of profitability and avoid sort of the repricing through the market. The internal investors knew what they had and said ‘We will take care of this.’ Now we’re starting to see companies that have gotten somewhere at the later stage and want to pick their growth rates back up.”

Thomvest raised its previous fund in 2017 and has made over 75 investments in total. Some notable companies include Blend Labs, Carta, Cohere, Kabbage, LendingClub, SoFi and Vungle.

Meanwhile, now managing directors, Umesh Padval will continue to lead investments into cybersecurity, cloud and AI/data infrastructure, while Nima Wedlake leads investments in real estate technology.

Explained in 5 charts: Venture capital in 2023

Crowd funding, new business or start up company to get money or venture capital to support or sponsor business concept, businessman hand giving money dollar coin to new business idea light bulb.

Inception Capital closes flagship $30M Fund of Funds focused on crypto emerging managers

Crowd funding, new business or start up company to get money or venture capital to support or sponsor business concept, businessman hand giving money dollar coin to new business idea light bulb.

Image Credits: Getty Images

Early-stage-focused web3 firm Inception Capital, formerly known as OP Crypto, has closed its inaugural fund at $30 million, David Gan, founder and general partner of the firm, exclusively shared with TechCrunch. This capital is in addition to the firms’ existing $50 million Venture Fund I.

The fund, OP Fund of Funds I LP, targeted family offices and high-net-worth individuals who want “diversified” exposure to early-stage crypto venture deals. It is backed by investors including Mirana, FJ Labs and Serafund. “Instead of family offices trying to make the best investments themselves, this vehicle is a good hedge and risk adjusted downside vehicle to get crypto exposure,” Gan said.

This vehicle plans to invest in about five new investment managers and funds annually, opposed to backing specific projects, protocols or startups, Gan added. “We’re putting our money in the hands of other institutional managers and getting a fairly diversified portfolio that these funds are invested into.”

The flagship vehicle will focus on investing in people “up and coming,” who are “hungry” and looking for early-stage startups. “This is a good calendar year to double down on the space, invest early and back entrepreneurs,” Gan said.

The fund has deployed about 30% to date and plans to continue its focus on emerging managers in the crypto venture space.

The five managers it has invested in are Syncracy Capital, Escape Velocity, Alliance, OrangeDAO and Everyrealm. It has also co-invested alongside Bain Capital Ventures, ParaFi Capital, Multicoin Capital and a16z’s Marc Andreessen and Chris Dixon. (Note: Inception Capital has a general partner stake in the first two managers.)

In general, the Fund of Fund (FoF) space is a massive market with billions of dollars in capital, but in the crypto sector, it’s “very small,” Gan said. “I can count the number of crypto Fund of Funds with one hand.”

But going forward, Gan thinks there’s big opportunities for managers that have grown over the past couple of years to take on sovereign wealth money, endowments, pension funds or institutional FoFs that can then propel the crypto venture space “to match that in the traditional market.”

This post was updated to include information about its Venture Fund I in the first graph.

What StepStone's $3.3B venture secondaries fund tells us about LPs' current appetite for venture

venture secondaries, StepStone

Image Credits: Nuthawut Somsuk / Getty Images

StepStone raised the largest fund dedicated to investing in venture secondaries ever, the firm announced last week. This fundraise doesn’t just say a lot about StepStone’s venture secondaries investing prowess, but also about how LPs are thinking about the current venture market.

The fund, StepStone VC Secondaries Fund VI, raised $3.3 billion. This marks a big step up from the fund’s predecessor, which closed on $2.6 billion, a record size at the time, in 2022. Fund VI was raised from both existing and new LPs and was oversubscribed, according to StepStone.

Secondaries funds like StepStone’s buy existing investor equity stakes in both individual startups, known as direct secondaries, and LP stakes in venture funds. Direct secondaries allow LPs access to startup stakes in already successful companies nearing an exit, which means less risk and less time to reward.

This record-setting fund comes at a time when venture fundraising is down sharply. In 2023, venture funds raised $66.9 billion, according to PitchBook data. That marks a 61% decrease from 2022 when funds closed on a record-breaking $172.8 billion.

While the negative overall venture fundraising numbers may imply that LPs are less interested in investing in startups, Brian Borton, a VC and growth equity partner at StepStone, told TechCrunch he doesn’t think that’s necessarily true. He thinks LPs are still just as interested, but after the wild valuations of 2020 and 2021, many of which have evaporated now, they are looking for venture strategies that return results faster and with less risk.

“LPs’ interest level in venture capital continues to be strong,” Borton said. “A lot of LPs are looking for broader or more differentiated ways of building their venture exposure and I think secondaries as a method of building that exposure certainly resonated.”

He added LPs are looking for ways to invest in venture-backed companies without as long of a holding period too. VCs, especially those that invest at the early stages, hold investments the longest of any private asset class.

“A lot of LPs learned the lesson that you can’t time the venture capital market,” Borton said. “There continues to be this institutional commitment to the asset class that we haven’t necessarily seen in past cycles. LPs aren’t throwing in the towel, they are just being more selective in who they are backing and making sure they are doing it in the right way.”

This fundraise also shows what LPs are thinking about the primary late-stage market too. LPs may be choosing to back a secondaries vehicle over a traditional late-stage or growth-stage focused fund because of price. Median late-stage valuations actually have risen since their initial decline when the market cooled in 2022, according to PitchBook data. Meanwhile, many secondaries deals still trade at a discount, according to data from secondaries deal tracking platform Caplight.

This fund close, and what it says about LP interest in late-stage startups and venture secondaries, should be good news to VCs. Many VCs are looking for liquidity in a still quiet exit market and while investors and startups want to sell stakes not every investor is allowed to buy.

Venture firms, unless they are registered investment advisors, can only hold up to 20% of their portfolio in secondary stakes, per SEC requirements. This means that there aren’t a ton of buyers for these secondary stakes outside of dedicated secondaries funds, hedge funds and crossover investors like Fidelity and T. Rowe Price.

Borton said that $3.3 billion is actually a small fund when you look at the potential size of the venture secondaries market, which continues to grow as startups continue to stay private for longer.

“We have the largest fund but we truly believe that is still undersized relative to the market opportunity in front of us,” Borton said. “This allows to be very selective in what we choose and transact on.”

Venture secondaries activity is up this year compared to last. Javier Avalos, the co-founder and CEO of Caplight, told TechCrunch that its platform has tracked $600 million of transaction volume so far this year, which represents a 50% increase over yearly activity at this time in 2023.

“What’s encouraging is that the pickup in volume is coming from both an increase in the number of trades closed and an increase in the average trade size,” Avalos told TechCrunch over email. “In Q2 of 2023, the average closed secondary trade size we observed was $1 million. We’ve seen almost double the closed trade size this quarter, indicating more institutional investor buyers are active in the market, as these funds typically participate in larger deals than individual investors would.”

If LPs are increasingly interested in the venture secondaries space, and trading volume continues to increase, Borton might be right that while StepStone’s $3.3 billion fund is the largest now, the market has room for more funds of that size or greater. StepStone’s fund may not be the largest fund for long.

China's $47B semiconductor fund puts chip sovereignty front and center

CPU chip on logic board connected by circuits

Image Credits: OsakaWayne Studios / Getty Images

China has closed a third state-backed investment fund to bolster its semiconductor industry and reduce reliance on other nations, both for using and for manufacturing wafers — prioritizing what is called chip sovereignty.

China’s National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund, also known simply as ‘the Big Fund,’ had two previous vintages: Big Fund I (2014 to 2019) and Big Fund II (2019 to 2024). The latter was significantly larger than the former, but Big Fund III is larger than both at 344 billion yuan, or about $47.5 billion, public filings revealed.

Exceeding expectations, and following Huawei’s recent increased reliance on Chinese suppliers, the size of Big Fund III confirms the country’s aim to achieve self-sufficiency in semiconductor production. It is also a reminder that the chip war between China and the West goes both ways.

The U.S. and Europe aren’t alone in wishing to reduce their dependence on their perennial tech rival. China, too, has reasons to worry about its supply, and it’s not just exports from the U.S. and its partners that are at risk. 

When it comes to chip manufacturing, Taiwan is the chief concern. China seizing control of its production capabilities would put the U.S. and its allies at a massive disadvantage; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) currently makes around 90% of the world’s most advanced chips. 

On the other hand, Bloomberg heard from sources that Netherlands-based ASML and TSMC have ways to disable chip-making machines in the event that China invades Taiwan.

As for China, it is producing some 60% of legacy chips — the type that are found in cars and appliances, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo recently declared. 

The chip war extends to both legacy and advanced chips, with uneven results.

The Chinese official narrative is that U.S. policy is backfiring, with exports from leading U.S. chip players dropping, and others share that view. 

Either way, this leaves a company like Nvidia walking a fine line “between maintaining the Chinese market and navigating U.S. tensions,” Hebe Chen, a market analyst at IG, recently told Reuters. The company tailored three chips for China after U.S. sanctions prevented it from exporting its most advanced semiconductors, but competition forced it to adopt a lower price than it might have wanted.

However, it could also be argued that the commercial struggles of Western chip players might be worth the cost if it can prevent China from developing and accessing more advanced chips as fast as its competitors.

How are global chipmakers preparing for the US-China chip war?

Signs indicate that restrictions could hit China where it hurts; for instance, if the country’s AI firms lose access to Nvidia’s cutting edge chips, or if it makes it harder for its champion, SMIC, to produce its own.

Big Fund III itself shows that China is feeling the heat. According to reports, the money will go towards large-scale wafer manufacturing like previous funds, but also to making High Bandwidth Memory chips. Known as HBM chips, these are used in AI, 5G, IoT and more.

Its size, though, is the biggest tell.

Backed by six major state-owned banks, Big Fund III is now larger than the $39 billion in direct incentives that the U.S. government will dedicate to chip manufacturing as part of the CHIPS Act. However, the whole federal funding envelope adds up to $280 billion. 

At €43 billion, the EU Chips Act looks small in comparison to both, as does South Korea’s $19 billion support package, and the markets likely took notice.

The news of Big Fund III caused a rally around stock from Chinese semiconductor companies that stand to benefit from this new capital. However, Bloomberg noted that Beijing’s past investments haven’t always paid off.

In particular, “China’s top leadership was frustrated with a years-long failure to develop semiconductors that could replace U.S. circuitry. In addition, the former boss of the Big Fund was removed and investigated for corruption,” the media outlet pointed out.

Even without corruption, making major changes to semiconductor manufacturing is a slow process. In Europe and the U.S, too, this takes time, but there are interesting new developments. 

French deep tech startup Diamfab, for instance, is working on diamond semiconductors that could support green transition, particularly in the automotive industry. That’s still a few years away, but it is the type of Western innovations that could be as interesting to track as whatever Chinese legacy players may do.

Additional reporting by Rita Liao.

Thomvest Ventures, Don Butler, Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake

Thomvest Ventures closes $250M fund to invest across fintech, cybersecurity, AI

Thomvest Ventures, Don Butler, Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake

Image Credits: Thomvest Ventures / Thomvest Ventures' managing directors, from left, Don Butler, Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake

Thomvest Ventures is popping into 2024 with a new $250 million fund and the promotion of Umesh Padval and Nima Wedlake to the role of managing directors.

The Bay Area venture capital firm was started about 25 years ago by Peter Thomson, whose family is the majority owners of Thomson Reuters.

“Peter has always had a very strong interest in technology and what technology would do in terms of shaping society and the future,” Don Butler, Thomvest Ventures’ managing director, told TechCrunch. He met Thomson in 1999 and joined the firm in 2000.

As we’ve seen over the past few years, the venture capital industry can’t help but be cyclical. Thomvest has watched it for decades, and in 2010 decided to leave the generalist world behind to specialize in investment in a few key industries, Butler said.

“For example, every time a specialist in cybersecurity would speak, you knew that this was somebody who knew the market intimately, knew our competition, knew the customers, knew the market demand,” Butler said. “And we were like, ‘Okay, we want to be like them.’”

AI startup Cohere, now valued at over $2.1B, raises $270M

Today, Thomvest Ventures deploys capital in the areas of financial and real estate technology, cybersecurity, cloud and AI/data infrastructure.

The new $250 million in capital commitments brings the firm’s total assets under management to $750 million.

Butler expects to invest in between 25 and 30 companies from the new fund. Check sizes will be $5 million to $15 million for early-stage and $7 million to $25 million in the later stage. Thomson has made a few investments so far, but they haven’t been made public yet, he said.

“The last two quarters have yielded record numbers of new prospects for us,” Butler said. “At a later stage the best companies were able to get to some form of profitability and avoid sort of the repricing through the market. The internal investors knew what they had and said ‘We will take care of this.’ Now we’re starting to see companies that have gotten somewhere at the later stage and want to pick their growth rates back up.”

Thomvest raised its previous fund in 2017 and has made over 75 investments in total. Some notable companies include Blend Labs, Carta, Cohere, Kabbage, LendingClub, SoFi and Vungle.

Meanwhile, now managing directors, Umesh Padval will continue to lead investments into cybersecurity, cloud and AI/data infrastructure, while Nima Wedlake leads investments in real estate technology.

Explained in 5 charts: Venture capital in 2023