SpaceX sent Starship to orbit — the next launch will try to bring it back

SpaceX’s massive Starship rocket could take to the skies for the fourth time on June 5, with the primary objective of evaluating the second stage’s reusable heat shield as the vehicle tries to safely reenter the atmosphere for the first time.

CEO Elon Musk“ said on his social media platform X that “There are many tough issues to solve with this vehicle, but the biggest remaining problem is making a reusable orbital return heat shield, which has never been done before.”

His post echos comments he made earlier this month when he noted that the primary goal of the next Starship test was “getting through max reentry heating.” 

That means the second stage’s novel heat shield, composed of around 18,000 ceramic hexagonal tiles, will be put to the test. Those tiles are designed to protect the second stage (which is also called Starship) from the extreme temperatures experienced when reentering Earth’s atmosphere. One of the biggest issues, Musk suggested, is the vulnerability of the system overall: “we are not resilient to loss of a single tile in most places,” he said. That means a single damaged or faulty tile could lead to catastrophe.

As Musk noted in his post, surviving reentry is just one part of the puzzle. The company will also need to establish an “entirely new supply chain” for the high-performance heat shield tiles, and manufacture them at a very high volume. 

It’s a tough problem, but solving it would move them closer to the holy grail of launch vehicles: full reusability. SpaceX made major headway in reusability with its workhorse Falcon 9 rocket — which has flown 56 times so far this year alone — but although the company recovers the booster, the second stage is expended in its target orbit. By reusing both stages of the rocket, SpaceX is hoping to drive down costs to a fraction of what they are today, all while delivering many orders of magnitude more mass to orbit in a single launch. (SpaceX’s Transporter ride-share missions cost $6,000 per kilogram.) 

If all goes to plan, the company will demonstrate the ability to return Starship to Earth via a controlled reentry and a soft splashdown in the Indian Ocean. SpaceX is also aiming to return the booster, called Super Heavy, also via ocean splashdown. And it will get on step closer to bringing the largest and most powerful launch system every built online, ready to transport cargo and eventually crew to Earth’s orbit and beyond. 

This next Starship launch will be the fourth in a series of orbital flight tests that kicked off last April. Before the launch can move ahead, SpaceX must receive a commercial launch license from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, the agency responsible for regulating commercial launch operations. The FAA also oversees investigations into rocket launches that go awry for any reason, and so it’s been working closely with SpaceX throughout the Starship test campaign. 

And the previous Starship launches have certainly gone awry: the first two ended in fiery mid-air explosions, and the third concluded when both Super Heavy and Starship likely disintegrated before hitting the ocean. But for SpaceX, which takes an iterative approach to hardware development, each test was ultimately a success because they furnished engineers with data on the rocket in a real-world flight environment. And it’s true that each mission has gone farther than the one previous: during the third flight, the engines pulled off full-duration burns as the vehicle ascended, and Starship ultimately reached orbit for the first time. 

Eventually, SpaceX aims to land both the Super Heavy booster and Starship second stage at its launch facility in southeast Texas, where they can be rapidly refurbished and returned to the pad. 

Global satellite communications. Conceptual representation of a global network of communications satellites, such as the Starlink satellites.

SpaceX will de-orbit 100 Starlink satellites with unidentified flaw

Global satellite communications. Conceptual representation of a global network of communications satellites, such as the Starlink satellites.

Image Credits: Getty Images

SpaceX announced today that it will be sending some 100 Starlink satellites to an early retirement after a flaw was identified that could make them a worry later on. Don’t expect a fiery light show, though, and if you use Starlink, your service should be unaffected.

The announcement explains that “the Starlink team identified a common issue” in this subset of first-generation communication satellites that could “increase the probability of failure.”

I’ve asked the company for further details and will update this post if I hear back, but based on the description and context, it seems likely that the “failure” in question would mean a loss of control. Seventeen Starlink satellites are “currently non-maneuverable,” but SpaceX did not say whether this was due to the same issue as the 100 being de-orbited.

Unpowered satellites are more or less just debris, even if at a low orbit like this one they’ll burn up in a few years rather than in a few hundred. One of the criticisms of mega-constellations like Starlink is their potential to contribute to the space junk problem, and SpaceX doesn’t want to be the one that people blame when the sky is full of broken satellites.

That explains why, with these satellites working perfectly well despite their age, SpaceX has decided to initiate controlled descents to take them out of orbit.

The descents will be triggered “in the coming weeks and months,” but these satellites aren’t capable of big moves, so this is more of a nudge in the downward direction. The de-orbit process will actually take about six months, during which they will also “take maneuver responsibility for any high-risk conjunctions,” meaning if they happen to cross paths with other satellites, the Starlink ones will politely move out of the way.

They will fall one by one, not all together, so don’t bother watching the skies.

Users of Starlink need not fear, however, since there are still thousands of functioning satellites up there. Nearly 6,000 have been launched to date, and 406 have been de-orbited, and others may not be operational, but there are more than enough of them to serve customers.

An Orbit Fab fuel shuttle is docking with an on-orbit satellite equipped with a RAFTI refueling port

Orbit Fab unveils $30K port to refuel satellites

An Orbit Fab fuel shuttle is docking with an on-orbit satellite equipped with a RAFTI refueling port

Image Credits: Orbit Fab (opens in a new window)

Orbit Fab wants to build “gas stations” for satellites — which means it needs the gas cap, a mechanism for transferring propellant from an orbital tanker to the customer spacecraft. That docking mechanism, called RAFTI, is now flight-qualified and on the market. The price tag for each port? Just $30,000.

The Colorado-based startup (and former TechCrunch Disrupt Battlefield finalist) has been in operation since 2018, and its CEO and co-founder Daniel Faber has been working in the space industry for decades; he’s likely best known for heading up Deep Space Industries (DSI), a company that was targeting asteroid mining. The company, which was founded in 2012, was acquired by Bradford Space seven years later.

“If you want [to talk about] something that’s too early, that’s it,” he joked during a recent interview. As part of the company’s efforts to eventually build tech capable of prospecting a distant asteroid, DSI built satellite thrusters for orbital maneuvering. This work, and subsequent conversations with customers and colleagues, eventually led Faber to believe that the next big opportunity was in-space refueling.

Part of it is simple math: Colleagues and former customers told him that they could squeeze as much as $1 million in marginal revenue from satellite missions from an extra kilogram of propellant.

orbit fab DSC03417
Image Credits: TechCrunch / Orbit Fab onstage at TechCrunch Disrupt in 2019

“Spacecraft are optimized with the amount of fuel they have, and when they get to the end of it, an extra kilo would give them a million dollars of marginal revenue,” Faber said. “We create so much value from that, we just have to do it.”

The 2010s also saw the emergence of a handful of satellite servicing companies, like Astroscale, which are developing technology for space debris removal, satellite life extension or last-mile satellite delivery. Faber calls these capabilities “tow truck applications,” and he realized that there would eventually be a need for orbital gas stations to complement this fleet.

So Orbit Fab was born. In the first year of operating, the company raised a $6 million seed round with contributions from Bolt and Munich Re Ventures, the VC arm of Munich Re Group, one of the biggest underwriters of satellites and rockets. In 2023, the company raised a $28.5 million Series A round.

The startup’s technology is ambitious, but the architecture is fairly simple: The idea is to equip customer satellites with the refueling port (Faber referred to it as a “gas cap,” but it’s officially called RAFTI) while the hardware is still on Earth. RAFTI, which stands for “Rapidly Attachable Fluid Transfer Interface,” can also be used to fuel spacecraft on the ground prior to launch. Once a RAFTI-equipped satellite runs out of propellant, one of Orbit Fab’s tankers would be able to pick up some fuel from orbital depots and deliver it straight to the customer’s satellite for refueling.

The only two things the company sells are fuel and the fueling ports; as one might expect, the real money will come from the fuel sales. On its website, Orbit Fab says its hydrazine delivery service in geostationary orbit will cost $20 million for up to 100 kilograms.

Given the simplicity of the architecture, nailing each part of the hardware is critical; hence why it’s taken years for Orbit Fab to debut the refueling port. There are many variables to consider: the cost to the customer, versus the potential marginal revenue from extra life on orbit; the impact of fueling on the customer spacecraft; and the challenge of developing a docking mechanism that can also transfer propellant.

In addition to all of these challenges, the company had to ensure its component complied with standards from NASA, the Space Force and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics to ensure it is safe, reliable and able to withstand the harsh environment of space.

“This wasn’t cheap,” Faber said. “It wasn’t quick, but at the end of the day, we have an elegant design that meets those requirements and has a simplicity to it that comes from doing a design well.”

One of the biggest shifts from when he started the company to now, Faber said, is the standing up of the U.S. Space Force and the effects that’s had on the space industry writ large. Orbit Fab ended up pivoting much of its attention to addressing the nascent needs of the Space Force, which was very interested in orbital mobility to avoid space debris or rendezvous with other satellites.

The company anticipates the first RAFTIs will go to orbit on customers’ satellites later this year. That will be followed by the first fuel shuttle going up next year, as part of a contract with the DOD to deliver fuel in geostationary orbit in 2025. Orbit Fab is aiming to sell 100 fueling ports this year, which will put the RAFTI “on a decent percentage of satellites going to orbit,” Faber said. Orbit Fab has an additional agreement with an unnamed commercial customer to deliver “a significant quantity of fuel” in a few years, he added.

Beyond these milestones, Faber intimated that the company already has plans to upgrade RAFTI, and to design variants that could support higher-pressure propellants. The team is also thinking about redesigning the grapple housing for larger spacecraft, should the market indicate that’s where they should go next.

“SpaceX has made rockets reusable, Orbit Fab makes satellites reusable,” Faber said. “In this world today, if you’re running a rocket company, and you’re not working towards reusable rockets, you’re working to a dead end. The same is true of satellites: If you’re not making your satellites reusable, you’re just putting preordained junk into orbit.”

https://techcrunch.com/unified-video/startup-battlefield-finals-orbit-fab/

Orbit Fab closes $28.5M Series A for on-orbit refueling capabilities