pills from a medication bottle being shaken into a hand

Justice hits eBay for $59M for selling obviously illegal pill-counterfeiting gear

pills from a medication bottle being shaken into a hand

Image Credits: Craig F. Walker / Boston Globe / Getty Images

You don’t need to resort to the dark web to find your illicit pill counterfeiting presses and molds. Just go to eBay and you can get one like new for a great price! Or at least you could until recently, when the Justice Department sued the company for facilitating the sale of thousands of devices clearly intended for illegal purposes — and now eBay owes $59 million.

Pill presses are the things you use if you’re a drug manufacturer — or a counterfeiter — to turn raw materials into pill form. While there are no doubt some perfectly mundane home uses for the smaller varieties of these things, it’s hard to imagine anyone needing to make thousands of pills per hour unless they’re a drug runner.

Not only were pill presses being sold on eBay, but the same buyers were also picking up counterfeit molds, stamps, and dyes, which let them produce fake pills of specific medications. The DOJ news release notes that many of these buyers were subsequently prosecuted; I’ve asked for more information on that, since it sounds like eBay may have unwittingly acted as a huge honey pot.

Anyone can tell you the opioid epidemic in the U.S. is real, and easy access to pill-counterfeiting hardware can only make it worse. Scoring a bag of Oxy off the street after getting addicted to the real thing, and getting something laced with fentanyl instead — that’s the kind of mistake that can, and does, cost lives with disturbing regularity.

eBay contended in a statement that it had taken “actions” to remove these devices “prior to any request from the DOJ or other authorities, and years before the government turned its attention to these products.” It’s hard to square this with the settlement, which states that the relevant time period was late 2015 to the present, during which time eBay did not properly record or report sales of the machines, despite selling thousands of commercial-grade presses to residential addresses — and sold counterfeit stamps and such to the same buyers. I’ve asked eBay for clarification on this.

Whatever eBay’s “actions” were, they amounted to less than the authorities would prefer, and to avoid any admission of wrongdoing (as is tradition) they have agreed to pay $59 million and “enhance its compliance program with respect to its prohibited and restricted items policy.”

In case you hear a bell ringing somewhere in your mind, this is a different case from that brought in September over the sale of illegal and dangerous pollutants.

DOJ says eBay sold thousands of illegal, poisonous and polluting products

a photo of Avast's logo on a phone on a red and orange blurry background

FTC bans antivirus giant Avast from selling its users' browsing data to advertisers

a photo of Avast's logo on a phone on a red and orange blurry background

Image Credits: Rafael Henrique / SOPA Images / LightRocket / Getty Images

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Thursday said it will ban the antivirus giant Avast from selling consumers’ web browsing data to advertisers after Avast claimed its products would prevent its users from online tracking.

Avast also settled the federal regulator’s charges for $16.5 million, which the FTC said will provide redress for Avast’s users whose sensitive browsing data was improperly sold on to ad giants and data brokers.

“Avast promised users that its products would protect the privacy of their browsing data but delivered the opposite,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement on Thursday. “Avast’s bait-and-switch surveillance tactics compromised consumers’ privacy and broke the law,” said Levine.

The FTC said Avast collected customers’ online browsing habits for years, including their web searches and which websites they visited, using Avast’s own browser extensions, which the antivirus giant claimed would “shield your privacy” by blocking online tracking cookies.

But the FTC alleged that Avast sold consumers’ browsing data through its now-shuttered subsidiary, Jumpshot, to more than a hundred other companies, making Avast tens of millions of dollars in revenue.

The regulator said that the browsing data that Jumpshot sold revealed consumers’ religious beliefs, health concerns, political leanings, their location, and other sensitive information.

A joint investigation by Vice News and PCMag in January 2020 revealed that Jumpshot was selling the highly sensitive web browsing data to companies, including Google, Yelp, Microsoft, Home Depot, and consulting giant McKinsey. The reports found Jumpshot was also selling access to its users’ click data, including the specific web links that its users were clicking on.

At the time, Avast had more than 430 million active users worldwide. Jumpshot said it had access to data from 100 million devices.

Avast shuttered its Jumpshot subsidiary days following the joint Vice-PCMag report.

Avast merged with Norton LifeLock in an $8.1 billion deal in 2021 and now falls under the parent company Gen Digital, which also owns the computer utility app CCleaner.

When reached on Thursday for comment, Gen Digital representative Jess Monney provided TechCrunch with a statement, saying: “When Avast voluntarily closed Jumpshot in 2020 it had ceased these practices. The operational provisions of the settlement are consistent with Avast’s current privacy and security programs.”

Avast’s statement said it disagreed with the government’s “allegations and characterization of the facts,” without specifying how or why, but that the company was “pleased to resolve this matter.”

CCleaner says hackers stole users’ personal data during MOVEit mass-hack