BigEndian founders hope to use their deep chip experience to help establish India in semiconductors

Chip manufacturing

Image Credits: sankai / Getty Images

India, despite being home to 20% of the world’s chip designers, lacks a significant presence in the global semiconductor market. However, in recent months, the Indian government has begun investing in an effort to establish the country in semiconductors, as companies worldwide have adopted a “China-plus-one” strategy, seeking alternatives to China.

BigEndian Semiconductors aims to capitalize on this shift by kicking off development of surveillance chips for cameras.

Founded in May, the Bengaluru-based fabless design startup is led by CEO Sunil Kumar, a former executive at ARM Broadcom, and Intel, and the rest of the founding team add experience at chipmakers like Broadcom and Cypress Semiconductors.

Kumar told TechCrunch BigEndian’s founding members had known each other for 25 years. However, he said that they decided to establish the startup after seeing significant domestic consumption — about 50 million cameras worth close to $4–$5 billion a year — alongside the incentives from the Indian government and drive from customers to find alternatives to China.

“If we don’t do it, this generation will die, and it will go. There’s nobody else who has that experience to do the entire cycle,” Kumar said in an interview.

BigEndian co-founder and CEO Sunil Kumar
Image Credits: BigEndian

India has set up a budget of $9 billion to boost the local development of semiconductors and display manufacturing companies. The Modi government has approved four semiconductor units in the country to produce chips for applications such as automotive, consumer electronics, EVs, industrial and telecom. These four units will attract an investment of around $17.9 billion and have a cumulative capacity of producing about 70 million chips a day, per government estimates.

For its part, four-month-old BigEndian initially plans surveillance chips, working with Taiwanese fab company UMC, with its reference chip based on a 28nm node process coming in the first quarter of 2025. The startup also plans to broaden its presence over time and look at the overall IoT market, predominantly led by 16- and 32-bit microcontrollers.

Unlike a traditional fabless semiconductor company, BigEndian is working on building its platform-as-a-service model to help governments avoid Chinese middleware access, which is common among existing surveillance solutions. This model will bring software solutions to help manufacturers and customers customize how their surveillance cameras work. It will allow the startup to grow its revenues by offering these customizations as add-ons at a subscription.

“India consumes about a billion of these chipsets a year,” said Kumar. “But these are all 50 cents to $1 kind of a chipset… If you go down the emerging automotive segment, a lot of 32-bit controllers go into automotives now… But we can’t dive into all these segments on day one because getting funding is a challenge in India.”

To kick off, BigEndian has raised $3 million in an all-equity seed round led by Vertex Ventures SEA and India. Even though the seed funding is not enough for a fabless semiconductor startup to fulfill mass orders, Kumar asserted that the Indian government’s incentives to the industry help BigEndian, which has a workforce of about 16 people, with tailwinds and make it “almost like raising $5 million.”

“Because this is a country that has not seen a big success in semiconductors, it is very, very unlikely that you’ll be able to raise at this stage. If I were in the U.S., we could actually raise close to about 12 to 15 million, but it’s not possible here, so you have to work with your constraints, and that’s what the challenges are. That’s probably also an entry barrier for us, [and] for other competition to come in,” he said.

The round also included participation from strategic investors, including Amitabh Nagpal, head of startup business development at Amazon Web Services. This will help the startup raise bigger checks in the following rounds.

BigEndian also plans not to limit itself to India as a market for its surveillance chips aimed at powering a wide range of middle to lower-end cameras.

“Our objective is to create your bread and butter, prove to the market that a silicon company from India can come and then climb up the food chain as opposed to coming top down,” Kumar said.

Climate X's founders mortgaged their house to stay afloat — now they've raised an $18M Series A

Image Credits: Climate X

When it comes to building software for climate tech, it might make sense at first to work on something in the general vicinity of carbon accounting, given that the hottest software companies in the space have something to do with either accounting, offsets, removals, or regulatory disclosure. A glance at the startups in the space makes it clear where investors are interested: New York’s Persefoni (accounting) has raised $164.2 million to date; Plan A (accounting/monitoring) in Berlin has raised $43 million; Supercritical (removals) raised $15.8 million, and CUR8 (removals) raised $6.7 million.

But there’s one niche in this sector that had a brief dawn before it was gobbled up in a spree of M&A: Assessing the climate risk of physical assets. To mine that rich seam once again, U.K. startup Climate X is now coming out of stealth with a cool $18 million Series A round led by GV (Google Ventures). The startup aims to help financial organizations price the impact of climate change across their physical asset portfolios and will use the new funding to expand in Europe, North America and APAC.

Existing investor Pale Blue Dot also participated in the round, alongside CommerzVentures, A/O, Blue Wire Capital, PT1, Unconventional Ventures and Western Technology Investment (WTI).

The startup claims its platform can assess the climate risk of both residential and commercial properties, as well as road, rail and power infrastructure. Its clients so far include Legal & General, CBRE and Virgin Money.

Founded by corporate risk veterans Lukky Ahmed (CEO) and Kamil Kluza (COO), Climate X is on a path well-trodden by startups. Four Twenty Seven, for example, made strides in assessing the impact of climate change on cities and infrastructure before it was bought by Moody’s, while the Climate Service helped companies factor climate risk into their decisions, eventually getting purchased by S&P Global. 

Still, the climate adaptation market is said to be worth around $2 trillion, per the World Economic Forum, so Climate X clearly has a decently large space to play in. 

Realizing that the financial services sector needed more scalable climate risk modeling, Ahmed and Kluza have built a digital twin of Earth, using more than 500 trillion data points, as well as a proprietary library of 1.5 billion individual assets and 44 million miles of infrastructure.

With a Google Maps-like interface, Climate X’s platform lets clients look at the effects of weather conditions, like extreme heat and flooding, over a 100-year time horizon on properties — they can even narrow it down to individual properties. The platform now assesses climate risk for financial services clients with over $6.5 trillion in combined AUM, Ahmed said.

But Climate X almost didn’t happen.

“We had a house in Birmingham we re-mortgaged because we didn’t really know how to raise venture capital, and we’d hired some people,” Ahmed told TechCrunch. “We were like, ‘We have to pay them!’ So that’s what we did. And then luckily, after saying no three or four times, eventually Pale Blue Dot said yes. They put in a small check, and that check suddenly grew into another conversation to leading the seed round.”

Since then, Ahmed says, he has taken “a lot of lessons around fundraising.”

Ahmed previously led stress-testing and risk transformation programs for HSBC Bank and Lloyds Banking Group, but he says tech entrepreneurship didn’t come easily or soon. “I didn’t go to university; I didn’t know what I wanted to do. I ended up in various retail and call center jobs,” he said. “After I joined HSBC, I found myself getting involved in M&A and eventually moving to Hong Kong, building the stress-testing function, where the bank was taking macroeconomic shocks and applying it to the balance sheet and P&L across different regions.”

But Ahmed felt the world was bigger than just working for a bank, so he came back to London in 2017, eventually working for Accenture and meeting his co-founder Kluza, who had modeled risk for organizations such as Barclays, MUFG and Accenture. Ahmed recalled, “I basically said to him, ‘Let’s go and do this for ourselves because, you know, Accenture is taking 60% of our work, and what are we doing?’”

Ahmed said Climate X raised the Series A with GV in the lead, “because the team is exceptional.”

“After a year of assessment of many many tools and services, we are … working with Climate X to help our clients understand and prepare for the risks associated with climate change,” Robert Bernard, chief sustainability officer at CBRE, said in a statement.

Climate X's founders mortgaged their house to stay afloat — now they've raised an $18M Series A

Image Credits: Climate X

When it comes to building software for climate tech, it might make sense at first to work on something in the general vicinity of carbon accounting, given that the hottest software companies in the space have something to do with either accounting, offsets, removals, or regulatory disclosure. A glance at the startups in the space makes it clear where investors are interested: New York’s Persefoni (accounting) has raised $164.2 million to date; Plan A (accounting/monitoring) in Berlin has raised $43 million; Supercritical (removals) raised $15.8 million, and CUR8 (removals) raised $6.7 million.

But there’s one niche in this sector that had a brief dawn before it was gobbled up in a spree of M&A: Assessing the climate risk of physical assets. To mine that rich seam once again, U.K. startup Climate X is now coming out of stealth with a cool $18 million Series A round led by GV (Google Ventures). The startup aims to help financial organizations price the impact of climate change across their physical asset portfolios and will use the new funding to expand in Europe, North America and APAC.

Existing investor Pale Blue Dot also participated in the round, alongside CommerzVentures, A/O, Blue Wire Capital, PT1, Unconventional Ventures and Western Technology Investment (WTI).

The startup claims its platform can assess the climate risk of both residential and commercial properties, as well as road, rail and power infrastructure. Its clients so far include Legal & General, CBRE and Virgin Money.

Founded by corporate risk veterans Lukky Ahmed (CEO) and Kamil Kluza (COO), Climate X is on a path well-trodden by startups. Four Twenty Seven, for example, made strides in assessing the impact of climate change on cities and infrastructure before it was bought by Moody’s, while the Climate Service helped companies factor climate risk into their decisions, eventually getting purchased by S&P Global. 

Still, the climate adaptation market is said to be worth around $2 trillion, per the World Economic Forum, so Climate X clearly has a decently large space to play in. 

Realizing that the financial services sector needed more scalable climate risk modeling, Ahmed and Kluza have built a digital twin of Earth, using more than 500 trillion data points, as well as a proprietary library of 1.5 billion individual assets and 44 million miles of infrastructure.

With a Google Maps-like interface, Climate X’s platform lets clients look at the effects of weather conditions, like extreme heat and flooding, over a 100-year time horizon on properties — they can even narrow it down to individual properties. The platform now assesses climate risk for financial services clients with over $6.5 trillion in combined AUM, Ahmed said.

But Climate X almost didn’t happen.

“We had a house in Birmingham we re-mortgaged because we didn’t really know how to raise venture capital, and we’d hired some people,” Ahmed told TechCrunch. “We were like, ‘We have to pay them!’ So that’s what we did. And then luckily, after saying no three or four times, eventually Pale Blue Dot said yes. They put in a small check, and that check suddenly grew into another conversation to leading the seed round.”

Since then, Ahmed says, he has taken “a lot of lessons around fundraising.”

Ahmed previously led stress-testing and risk transformation programs for HSBC Bank and Lloyds Banking Group, but he says tech entrepreneurship didn’t come easily or soon. “I didn’t go to university; I didn’t know what I wanted to do. I ended up in various retail and call center jobs,” he said. “After I joined HSBC, I found myself getting involved in M&A and eventually moving to Hong Kong, building the stress-testing function, where the bank was taking macroeconomic shocks and applying it to the balance sheet and P&L across different regions.”

But Ahmed felt the world was bigger than just working for a bank, so he came back to London in 2017, eventually working for Accenture and meeting his co-founder Kluza, who had modeled risk for organizations such as Barclays, MUFG and Accenture. Ahmed recalled, “I basically said to him, ‘Let’s go and do this for ourselves because, you know, Accenture is taking 60% of our work, and what are we doing?’”

Ahmed said Climate X raised the Series A with GV in the lead, “because the team is exceptional.”

“After a year of assessment of many many tools and services, we are … working with Climate X to help our clients understand and prepare for the risks associated with climate change,” Robert Bernard, chief sustainability officer at CBRE, said in a statement.

An image showing how parents can disable My AI

Snapchat now lets parents restrict their teens from using the app’s ‘My AI’ chatbot

An image showing how parents can disable My AI

Image Credits: Snapchat

Snapchat is introducing new parental controls that will allow parents to restrict their teens from interacting with the app’s AI chatbot. The changes will also allow parents to view their teens’ privacy settings, and get easier access to Family Center, which is the app’s dedicated place for parental controls.

Parents can now restrict My AI, Snapchat’s AI-powered chatbot, from responding to chats from their teen. The new parental control comes as Snapchat launched My AI nearly a year ago and faced criticism for doing so without appropriate age-gating features, as the chatbot was found to be chatting to minors about topics like covering up the smell of weed and setting the mood for sex.

Snapchat says the new restriction feature builds on My AI’s current safeguards, including “including protections against inappropriate or harmful responses, temporary usage restrictions if Snapchatters repeatedly misuse the service, and age-awareness.”

In addition, parents will now be able to see their teens’ safety and privacy settings. For instance, a parent can see if their teen has the ability to share their Story with their friends or a smaller group of select users. Plus, a parent can see who is able to contact their teen on the app by viewing their contact settings. Parents can now also see if their teen is sharing their location with their friends on the Snap Map.

As for parents who may be unaware about the app’s parental controls, Snapchat is making Family Center easier to find. Parents can now find Family Center right from their profile, or by heading to their settings.

Image Credits: Snapchat

“Snapchat was built to help people communicate with their friends in the same way they would offline, and Family Center reflects the dynamics of real-world relationships between parents and teens, where parents have insight into who their teens are spending time with, while still respecting the privacy of their personal communications,” Snapchat wrote in the blog post. “We worked closely with families and online safety experts to develop Family Center and use their feedback to update it with additional features on a regular basis.”

Snapchat launched Family Center back in 2022 in response to increased pressure on social networks to do more to protect young users on their platforms from harm both in the U.S. and abroad.

The expansion of the app’s parental controls come as Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel is scheduled to testify before the Senate on child safety on January 31, alongside X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, Meta and Discord. Committee members are expected to press executives from the companies on their platforms’ inability to protect children online.

The changes also come two months after Snap and Meta received formal requests for information (RFI) from the European Commission about the steps they are taking to protect young users on their social networks. The Commission has also sent similar requests to TikTok and YouTube.

Snapchat isn’t the only company to release features related to child safety this week, as Meta introduced new limitations earlier this week. The tech giant announced that it was going to start automatically limiting the type of content that teen Instagram and Facebook accounts can see on the platforms. These accounts will automatically be restricted from seeing harmful content, such as posts about self-harm, graphic violence and eating disorders.

Meta and Snap latest to get EU request for info on child safety, as bloc shoots for ‘unprecedented’ transparency

Meta to restrict teen Instagram and Facebook accounts from seeing content about self-harm and eating disorders

Self-driving taxis are tested on a street in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China

Chinese EV makers, and their connected vehicles, targeted by new House bill

Self-driving taxis are tested on a street in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China

Image Credits: Costfoto/NurPhoto / Getty Images

Chinese EV manufacturers face a new challenge in their pursuit of U.S. customers: a new House bill that would limit or ban the introduction of their connected vehicles.

The bill, introduced by U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin, comes as the trade war between the U.S. and China heightens in the aftermath of the Biden administration’s decision to quadruple import duties on Chinese electric vehicles to 100%. 

Chinese EV manufacturers haven’t yet made significant inroads into the U.S., as they have in Europe. The bill’s goal appears to curb manufacturers before they can flood the American market with smart, cheap cars. 

Slotkin, a former CIA analyst and Pentagon official, has repeatedly warned Congress about the threat posed by Chinese-built connected vehicles. Earlier this month in a speech on the House floor, Slotkin outlined how the Chinese government has heavily subsidized its auto industry to sell advanced, low-cost EVs equipped with sensors like lidar, radar and cameras that are capable of collecting and transmitting data back to Chinese authorities. 

“If allowed into our markets, Chinese connected vehicles offer the Chinese government a treasure trove of valuable intelligence on the United States, including the potential to collect information on our military bases, critical infrastructure like the power grid and traffic systems, and even locate specific U.S. leaders should they so choose,” said Slotkin in a statement released Wednesday. “China owns a fast-growing share of the connected auto market in Europe and Mexico, so now is the time to make sure our defenses are up, before these vehicles enter the U.S. market.”

Last week, provisions that Slotkin championed — like a ban on Chinese connected vehicles at U.S. military bases and a prohibition on procuring Chinese-made lidar by the Department of Defense — made it into the U.S. government’s annual defense spending bill. 

Slotkin’s bill, called the Connected Vehicle National Security Review Act, if passed into law, wouldn’t just review EVs but also autonomous vehicles. A number of AV companies with ties to China, like WeRide and Pony.ai, have active permits to test in California. Alphabet’s Waymo also has a deal with Chinese startup Zeekr to produce purpose-built robotaxis. 

Waymo did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment on this bill.

How this bill will affect Chinese EVs

As far as EVs go, Volvo and Polestar have a presence in the United States, and both are owned by China’s Geely Automotive. The majority of Volvo vehicles are assembled in Sweden, and the next generation of Volvo vehicles for the North American market will be built in a recently opened plant in Ridgeville, South Carolina. 

A Polestar spokesperson assured TechCrunch that it doesn’t share personal data from North American and European customers with China, and that as the automaker is headquartered in Sweden, it’s required to comply with GDPR laws.

Regardless, this bill would not free cars built in friendly nations, or domestically, from scrutiny. If passed, the bill would give the Department of Commerce authority to review any sale, importation or other transaction that involves a connected vehicle “designed, built or supplied” by any company that’s at all connected with China or a country of concern. 

The bill takes traditional trade-restriction tools like tariffs one step further by potentially banning connected vehicles bound for the U.S. that are manufactured by Chinese companies in countries like Mexico. That could be aimed at carmakers like BYD, whose CEO Stella Li said in February that the automaker was shopping for a plant in Mexico. 

The bill would also give clear legal power to the Department of Commerce and other federal agencies to strengthen national security protections and prevent future administrations from undoing these protections, a move Slotkin said is not a hypothetical. 

Slotkin pointed to then-President Donald Trump’s order that would have given the U.S. authority to address security risks from social media platform TikTok, which is owned by Chinese company ByteDance. President Joe Biden in April signed a bill that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sold the app. Trump, who is running for re-election this November, has since backtracked on his previous position and even opposed the efforts to force a sale. 

The U.S.’s elevated concerns over China’s data prowess come as Beijing relaxes rules that govern cross-border data flows. Tesla is reportedly trying to take advantage of this to get the green light to send its own connected car data back to the U.S. to train Tesla’s “full self-driving”  algorithms. 

Slotkin’s bill also comes as the Department of Commerce promises to issue a ruling on Chinese connected vehicles later this year, following the Biden administration’s launch of a probe in February into the national security risks of such vehicles. 

Slotkin plans to introduce the bill after June 3, once Congress is back in session after the Memorial Day recess.

This article was updated to include comment from Polestar. It was originally published at 8:55 a.m. PT.

MoviePass co-founders speak their truth in HBO’s new documentary 

Stacy Spikes

Image Credits: HBO

HBO’s new documentary, “MoviePass, MovieCrash,” tells a story that many of us know about: how MoviePass, the subscription-based movie ticketing startup, was a catastrophic failure. After a series of mishaps and deception, it filed for bankruptcy in 2020. 

However, the movie also tells the underreported tale of two Black men who aimed to disrupt the moviegoing space but were then thrown out of the company and forced to watch from the sidelines as their creation burned to the ground.

Mitch Lowe, a former Redbox and Netflix executive, and Ted Farnsworth, CEO of analytics and consulting company Helios & Matheson, are often considered the faces of MoviePass. However, neither of them deserves credit. MoviePass was originally co-founded by former Miramax exec Stacy Spikes and serial entrepreneur Hamet Watt.

The premiere of “MoviePass, MovieCrash,” which is available on Max starting today, comes at a time when only 2.7% of U.S. businesses are majority Black-owned, according to recent estimates from the Annual Business Survey. Spikes hopes this documentary will shed light on his perspective and underscore the necessity of increased funding for Black founders.

“The truth is going to be told,” Spikes told TechCrunch. He added that the documentary is not only about “the rise and fall of MoviePass,” but also addresses the fact that we’re still in the early days of venture capitalists’ mindsets changing and that “more women and founders of color” are being accepted. 

(We recommend watching the documentary before reading this article.)

When Lowe was first brought on as CEO in 2016, MoviePass had already existed for five years. It was initially a membership where customers got their own debit card that automatically loaded with the exact amount of a movie ticket. Customers selected the film they wanted to see within the MoviePass app. However, user growth wasn’t where it needed to be — the service was hovering at around 20,000 subscribers. 

The company also needed more money, yet it faced the harsh reality of the disparity in venture capital funding for Black-owned companies. To this day, a minuscule portion of funding goes to Black founders. In 2023, Black founders in the U.S. raised 0.48% of all venture capital, so about $661 million out of the $136 billion allocated in total. This number was the lowest recorded in recent history, with Black founders typically making up at least 1% of all venture dollars deployed. 

Ultimately, the founders thought that bringing on a “white male with grey hair” would inspire other white males to be “more comfortable” investing, Watt shared in the documentary. A year after Lowe joined, Helios & Matheson bought a controlling stake in MoviePass for $27 million.

Image Credits: HBO

“You had these seasoned founders who knew what they were doing and had a lot of success and yet hit a ceiling with being able to raise capital. Then you have two white guys who can raise $150 million off the very same brand,” Spikes told us. He took the role of chief operating officer until 2018. Watt remained a member of the board. 

MoviePass quickly shifted gears under its new owner. To draw in as many customers as possible, the company lowered the subscription fee significantly to $10 per month for one movie every day. The price change attracted approximately 175,000 users in 48 hours, giving the service mainstream prominence. By 2018, it had skyrocketed to over 3 million subscribers. 

“The $10 price was supposed to be promotional. We were only going to put 100,000 people at that level. The moment [Lowe and Farnsworth] said they didn’t want to turn that off was a big red flag because $10 is not a sustainable price. It’s just not,” Spikes added, explaining that the average ticket price was $11.50 at the time, so customers going to multiple movies per week cost the company tons of money.

In fact, MoviePass was losing millions of dollars every month. It lost $40 million in May 2018 alone.

Spikes’ warnings to Lowe and Farnsworth were ignored, and MoviePass fired him in 2018, he says. Watt was also let go. 

“Mitch and Ted would push back and say, ‘We know what we’re doing. We bought you. Thank you for sharing,’” Spikes said in the documentary. “It broke my heart to see two Black founders create a company the way we did, and then all of a sudden, there was an all-white board.” 

“He just wasn’t being a constructive member of the team,” Lowe said.

Attempts to reach Lowe and Farnsworth for comment were unsuccessful.

Image Credits: HBO

Later on, MoviePass went back on its unlimited movie promise and began limiting its offering to three movies a month. The company also tried alternate revenue streams like selling data to advertisers, producing movies via an in-house studio and even a bizarre venture into the airline business. 

From extravagant yacht parties to frivolous spending of $1.1 million on an unnecessary Coachella event, the spending spree exemplified an outrageous level of corporate greed.

When speaking about the Coachella event, Lowe said, “I sensed a resentment by the MoviePass employees [who weren’t invited.] Each individual has their various roles and not all roles get to party.”

“I’m sitting at home and in my Twitter feed, here’s Dennis Rodman getting out of a MoviePass helicopter at Coachella… [They’re] burning through money. The staff is suffering…It doesn’t make any sense,” Spikes said during our interview. 

Meanwhile, customer support workers and other MoviePass team members were dealing with a sinking ship as the site faced repeated outages and angry customers. (Spikes claimed in a previous interview with TechCrunch that those crashes were intentional.) In the summer of 2019, a data breach exposed tens of thousands of MoviePass card numbers as well as customers’ personal credit card numbers.

In its short years under Lowe and Farnsworth, MoviePass crumbled. The two executives are currently awaiting trial after pleading not guilty to one count of securities fraud and three counts of wire fraud. 

Spikes, meanwhile, managed to turn his story around. He purchased MoviePass in 2021 and relaunched it last year. It appears to be successful so far as it became profitable for the first time in 2023. 

During the interview with TechCrunch, Spikes also mentioned details that didn’t make it in HBO’s new film, such as building a VR app for MoviePass viewers to watch movie trailers on Meta Quest and Apple Vision Pro headsets. He’s hoping for a summer launch.  

Watt founded his own venture capital firm, Share Ventures, in 2019, which invests in healthcare and tech companies.

The revamped MoviePass goes nationwide

An image showing how parents can disable My AI

Snapchat now lets parents restrict their teens from using the app’s ‘My AI’ chatbot

An image showing how parents can disable My AI

Image Credits: Snapchat

Snapchat is introducing new parental controls that will allow parents to restrict their teens from interacting with the app’s AI chatbot. The changes will also allow parents to view their teens’ privacy settings, and get easier access to Family Center, which is the app’s dedicated place for parental controls.

Parents can now restrict My AI, Snapchat’s AI-powered chatbot, from responding to chats from their teen. The new parental control comes as Snapchat launched My AI nearly a year ago and faced criticism for doing so without appropriate age-gating features, as the chatbot was found to be chatting to minors about topics like covering up the smell of weed and setting the mood for sex.

Snapchat says the new restriction feature builds on My AI’s current safeguards, including “including protections against inappropriate or harmful responses, temporary usage restrictions if Snapchatters repeatedly misuse the service, and age-awareness.”

In addition, parents will now be able to see their teens’ safety and privacy settings. For instance, a parent can see if their teen has the ability to share their Story with their friends or a smaller group of select users. Plus, a parent can see who is able to contact their teen on the app by viewing their contact settings. Parents can now also see if their teen is sharing their location with their friends on the Snap Map.

As for parents who may be unaware about the app’s parental controls, Snapchat is making Family Center easier to find. Parents can now find Family Center right from their profile, or by heading to their settings.

Image Credits: Snapchat

“Snapchat was built to help people communicate with their friends in the same way they would offline, and Family Center reflects the dynamics of real-world relationships between parents and teens, where parents have insight into who their teens are spending time with, while still respecting the privacy of their personal communications,” Snapchat wrote in the blog post. “We worked closely with families and online safety experts to develop Family Center and use their feedback to update it with additional features on a regular basis.”

Snapchat launched Family Center back in 2022 in response to increased pressure on social networks to do more to protect young users on their platforms from harm both in the U.S. and abroad.

The expansion of the app’s parental controls come as Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel is scheduled to testify before the Senate on child safety on January 31, alongside X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, Meta and Discord. Committee members are expected to press executives from the companies on their platforms’ inability to protect children online.

The changes also come two months after Snap and Meta received formal requests for information (RFI) from the European Commission about the steps they are taking to protect young users on their social networks. The Commission has also sent similar requests to TikTok and YouTube.

Snapchat isn’t the only company to release features related to child safety this week, as Meta introduced new limitations earlier this week. The tech giant announced that it was going to start automatically limiting the type of content that teen Instagram and Facebook accounts can see on the platforms. These accounts will automatically be restricted from seeing harmful content, such as posts about self-harm, graphic violence and eating disorders.

Meta and Snap latest to get EU request for info on child safety, as bloc shoots for ‘unprecedented’ transparency

Meta to restrict teen Instagram and Facebook accounts from seeing content about self-harm and eating disorders

YouTube podcast screen

Podcasters can now upload their RSS feed to YouTube

YouTube podcast screen

Image Credits: YouTube

Podcast creators can now submit their RSS feed to YouTube and YouTube Music, the company revealed in a video uploaded to its Creator Insider channel. It was previously announced in August that support was coming for RSS feeds. The functionality was available as an invite-only beta test last year.

The move to embrace RSS feeds helps YouTube cement its position as a top destination for podcasts. Other platforms only make RSS feeds available for listeners, whereas YouTube takes episodes from an RSS feed and turns them into YouTube videos. This benefits audio-first podcasters since YouTube automatically takes an uploaded RSS feed and creates videos with the podcast’s show art as a static image.

Image Credits: YouTube

Podcasters can submit an RSS feed to YouTube by going to YouTube Studio, clicking the “Create” button in the upper-right corner and then selecting “Submit RSS feed.” There’s also an option to connect an existing podcast to an RSS feed in the Content tab. When a new episode is added to the RSS feed, YouTube will automatically upload the video to the channel and notify subscribers.

Last week, Google reported that YouTube has more than 100 million paid users across YouTube Music and YouTube Premium.

Updated 2/8/24 with the removal of an incorrect statement that says Spotify doesn’t support RSS functionality.

YouTube to support RSS uploads for podcasters by year-end, plus private feeds in YouTube Music

Mastodon users can now share their profiles via QR code on Android

Image Credits: Mastodon

Decentralized social network Mastodon has updated its official app for Android to let users easily share their profiles with QR codes. This could be useful in loud places like event and hotel lobbies to exchange profiles, the company said in a blog post.

To share the QR code, users can go to their profile tab and tap the QR icon next to their name to get a code related to the profile others can scan.

The organization is also trying to make the fediverse simple to understand for users. To that end, it has now added explainers about domain names in Mastodon handles. When you tap on a handle, the app shows you the dialog explaining why username and server names are different. The app also highlights the username or the server name in the handle when you tap on the explanations.

Mastodon handle explanation card
Image Credits: Mastodon.org

Mastodon has also updated prompts for blocking and muting to explain the effects of taking those actions on a profile.

Mastodon mute action explanation card
Image Credits: mastodon.org

The new Android also has a few smaller updates such as a new link card preview displaying a post’s author and date, as well as easy-to-understand drop-down menus on profiles.

Mastodon is now facing stiff competition in the decentralized social network space as Bluesky opened up to the public earlier this month and has also started working on federation. Users trying out Mastodon have complained about the complicated nature of having different servers on the ActivityPub network. The company will have to work on making it easier for users to understand and navigate the decentralized social world.