Iranian hackers charged with hacking Trump campaign to 'stoke discord'

Iranian flags wave in the wind during a military parade.

Image Credits: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto / Getty Images

The U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against three hackers working for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), accusing the trio of a four-year-long hacking campaign that included this year’s hack of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. 

On Friday, U.S. prosecutors published an indictment accusing Masoud Jalili, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, and Yasar (Yaser) Balaghi of targeting the Trump campaign, former White House and senior government officials, and members of Congress, as part of a hack-and-leak operation.

According to the indictment, the operation was launched in part in retaliation for the killing of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani by the Trump administration in 2020, for which the Iranian government vowed revenge. U.S. officials have since charged at least one individual with the attempted assassination of John Bolton, a former National Security Advisor, as part of the wider Iranian effort to target former members of the Trump administration.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said at a press conference Friday that the Iranian hacking campaign was in part aimed at influencing the upcoming 2024 presidential election. 

“The defendant’s own words make clear that they were attempting to undermine former President Trump’s campaign in advance of the 2024 U.S. presidential election,” said Garland. “We know that Iran is continuing its brazen efforts to stoke discord, erode confidence in the U.S. electoral process, and advance its malign activities to the IRGC, a designated foreign terrorist organization.”

“These authoritarian regimes which violate the human rights of their own citizens do not get a say in our country’s democratic process,” said Garland. “The American people and the American people alone will decide the outcome of our country’s elections.”

Masoud Jalili, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, and Yasar (Yaser) Balaghi, the three Iranian hackers indicted for a hacking campaign that included the intrusion against the Donald Trump presidential campaign. (Image: U.S. Department of Justice).
Masoud Jalili, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, and Yasar (Yaser) Balaghi, the three Iranian hackers indicted for a hacking campaign that included the intrusion against the Donald Trump presidential campaign.
Image Credits: U.S. Department of Justice

The indictment said the Iranian operation targeted former senior government officials with phishing lures that were used to compromise their online accounts and steal campaign material with the goal of leaking the files to the media.

In August, Politico, The New York Times, The Washington Post and others received documents allegedly stolen from the Donald Trump campaign. Politico reported that an individual going by the name “Robert” had reached out and shared documents that appeared to have been stolen from the Republican candidate’s camp. 

Since the beginning, the story had the hallmarks of a hack-and-leak operation, akin to what the Russian government orchestrated in 2016, after hacking the Democratic National Committee and people connected to the Hillary Clinton campaign. Unlike 2016, however, the news organizations decided to not report on the content of the documents, let alone release them. Instead, the reporters focused on the fact that the files had been stolen and leaked. 

Kevin Collier, a journalist at NBC News, who said he has seen some of the documents, said the files did not contain much worth writing about.

“At least half a dozen outlets and independent reporters have received hacked Trump files from ‘Robert,’ a front for Iranian intelligence. To date, no reporter who’s seen them has found news in them,” Collier wrote on X on Thursday. 

Ten days after Politico’s report, the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA released a joint statement accusing the government of Iran of being behind the hack-and-leak operation. 

“The [Intelligence Community] is confident that the Iranians have through social engineering and other efforts sought access to individuals with direct access to the presidential campaigns of both political parties. Such activity, including thefts and disclosures, are intended to influence the U.S. election process,” read the statement. “It is important to note that this approach is not new. Iran and Russia have employed these tactics not only in the United States during this and prior federal election cycles but also in other countries around the world.”

Microsoft and Google also accused Iranian government-backed hackers of being behind the targeting of people affiliated with both the Trump and Biden campaigns. 

On Thursday, more than a month after the first report saying journalists had the documents, independent journalist Ken Klippenstein published a 271-page dossier on Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance. Klippenstein wrote that since June, “the news media has been sitting on it (and other documents), declining to publish in fear of finding itself at odds with the government’s campaign against ‘foreign malign influence.’”

“I disagree. The dossier has been offered to me and I’ve decided to publish it because it’s of keen public interest in an election season,” wrote Klippenstein.

Meta removes special restrictions for Trump's account ahead of 2024 elections

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - AUGUST 24: Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport after being booked at the Fulton County jail on August 24, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. Trump was booked on multiple charges related to an alleged plan to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

Image Credits: Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images / Getty Images

Meta announced former President Donald Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts will no longer be subject to heightened suspension penalties, according to an updated blog post on Friday. The company says it made the decision to ensure all Presidential nominees were on equal footing on their platform ahead of the 2024 Presidential election.

When Meta reinstated Trump’s social media profiles in January 2023, the company subjected him to stricter penalties than other users. Under the heightened penalties, the former President could have been banned for up to two years for violating Meta’s community standards. Now, the company says Trump will be held to the same penalties as any other Facebook or Instagram user.

Under those rules for normal users, breaking Facebook’s Community Standards will lead to a warning. After two strikes, users can be banned from specific posting features for limited amounts of time. Only after seven violations are users banned from posting for an entire day, and 10 strikes to receive a month long ban

“In assessing our responsibility to allow political expression, we believe that the American people should be able to hear from the nominees for President on the same basis,” said Meta in a blog post.

Meta originally banned Trump following the January 6 insurrection in 2021, back when Facebook was Trump’s favorite way to communicate with his supporters online. At the time, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said “the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” before banning Trump indefinitely. These days, Trump regularly posts on Facebook for his 34 million followers, but he’s more active on his own social media platform, Truth Social.

The company is rolling back its harsh penalties against the former President just before the 2024 Republican National Convention. However, Meta says these heightened suspension penalties were a response to extreme circumstances, and were never deployed against Trump.

Earlier this week, Donald Trump posted a threatening statement against Mark Zuckerberg on Truth Social. The former President said he would put “election fraudsters” in prison and called the CEO of Meta out by his latest nickname, “Zuckerbucks.” Trump warned Zuckerberg to “be careful.”

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's X Spaces event crashes

Former President Trump in front of an American flag

Image Credits: Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images

Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s joint X Spaces event appears to have crashed Monday afternoon. The conversation between the owner of X and the former president was scheduled for 5 p.m. PT, but users received an error message when joining at that time.

“This Space is not available,” said a message on X when trying to join the Space.

The highly anticipated conversation — which has been promoted by Trump and Musk — was supposed to mark the former U.S. president’s return to X. The Spaces event, which Musk called a “conversation,” started at 5:42 p.m. PT. The live event was scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. PT.

Image Credits: Screenshot from X

Trump returned to the social media outlet Monday morning, where he posted for the first time since January 2021 when he was banned from the platform. Some of Trump’s Monday posts promoted the conversation with Musk, while others featured campaign ads and links to the former president’s website. For the last three years, Trump has switched to primarily posting on his own social media platform Truth Social. That said, Trump has been allowed to post on X for nearly two years; shortly after Musk took over Twitter, now X, he reinstated Trump’s Twitter account in November 2022.

Musk claimed that “a massive DDoS attack on X” appeared to have occurred, supposedly the cause of the crashed X Space. The owner of X says the social media platform conducted extensive testing earlier today with 8 million concurrent listeners. Musk kicked off the Space interview by connecting the alleged DDoS attack — which stands for “distributed denial-of-service,” in which a bad actor overwhelms an internet server with a flood of artificial traffic — with opposition to hearing the former president.

“As this massive attack illustrates, there’s a lot of opposition to people just hearing what President Trump has to say and so, but I’m honored to have this conversation,” Musk said as the Spaces began.

This is not the first instance of an X Space crashing when a political campaign tries to use the platform. In May 2023, Twitter’s technical issues interrupted Ron DeSantis’s 2024 campaign announcement during a Twitter Space session with Elon Musk and venture capitalist David Sacks.

UAW files federal labor charges against Trump, Musk for intimidating workers at X Spaces event

Donald Trump

Image Credits: Brandon Bell / Getty Images

The United Auto Workers union said Tuesday that it filed federal labor charges against Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

The union alleges that Trump and Musk attempted to “threaten and intimidate workers” who engage in strikes after comments made during the now notorious X Spaces interview Monday evening.

“They go on strike, I won’t mention the name of the company, but they go on strike and you say, That’s OK, you’re all gone. You’re all gone. So, every one of you is gone,” Trump told Musk.  

The UAW — which recently endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president — says those comments can be construed as advocating for the firing of striking workers, which is illegal under the National Labor Relations Act. 

“Both Trump and Musk want working class people to sit down and shut up, and they laugh about it openly. It’s disgusting, illegal, and totally predictable from these two clowns,” said UAW president Shawn Fain in a statement.

UAW files federal labor charges against Trump, Musk for intimidating workers at X Spaces event

Donald Trump

Image Credits: Brandon Bell / Getty Images

The United Auto Workers union said Tuesday that it filed federal labor charges against Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

The union alleges that Trump and Musk attempted to “threaten and intimidate workers” who engage in strikes after comments made during the now notorious X Spaces interview Monday evening.

“They go on strike, I won’t mention the name of the company, but they go on strike and you say, That’s OK, you’re all gone. You’re all gone. So, every one of you is gone,” Trump told Musk.  

The UAW – which recently endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president – says those comments can be construed as advocating for the firing of striking workers, which is illegal under the National Labor Relations Act. 

“Both Trump and Musk want working class people to sit down and shut up, and they laugh about it openly. It’s disgusting, illegal, and totally predictable from these two clowns,” said UAW president Shawn Fain in a statement.

Meta removes special restrictions for Trump's account ahead of 2024 elections

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - AUGUST 24: Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport after being booked at the Fulton County jail on August 24, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. Trump was booked on multiple charges related to an alleged plan to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

Image Credits: Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images / Getty Images

Meta announced former President Donald Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts will no longer be subject to heightened suspension penalties, according to an updated blog post on Friday. The company says it made the decision to ensure all Presidential nominees were on equal footing on their platform ahead of the 2024 Presidential election.

When Meta reinstated Trump’s social media profiles in January 2023, the company subjected him to stricter penalties than other users. Under the heightened penalties, the former President could have been banned for up to two years for violating Meta’s community standards. Now, the company says Trump will be held to the same penalties as any other Facebook or Instagram user.

Under those rules for normal users, breaking Facebook’s Community Standards will lead to a warning. After two strikes, users can be banned from specific posting features for limited amounts of time. Only after seven violations are users banned from posting for an entire day, and 10 strikes to receive a month long ban

“In assessing our responsibility to allow political expression, we believe that the American people should be able to hear from the nominees for President on the same basis,” said Meta in a blog post.

Meta originally banned Trump following the January 6 insurrection in 2021, back when Facebook was Trump’s favorite way to communicate with his supporters online. At the time, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said “the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” before banning Trump indefinitely. These days, Trump regularly posts on Facebook for his 34 million followers, but he’s more active on his own social media platform, Truth Social.

The company is rolling back its harsh penalties against the former President just before the 2024 Republican National Convention. However, Meta says these heightened suspension penalties were a response to extreme circumstances, and were never deployed against Trump.

Earlier this week, Donald Trump posted a threatening statement against Mark Zuckerberg on Truth Social. The former President said he would put “election fraudsters” in prison and called the CEO of Meta out by his latest nickname, “Zuckerbucks.” Trump warned Zuckerberg to “be careful.”

Donald Trump in court as he enters not guilty plea during April 4, 2023 arraignment

Truth Social SPAC could pay Trump's astronomical legal bills — if board approves it

Donald Trump in court as he enters not guilty plea during April 4, 2023 arraignment

Image Credits: Seth Wenig-Pool/Getty Images

Donald Trump’s beleaguered SPAC deal is finally going through, and just in time to pay nearly half a billion dollars owed over several legal actions — if the board agrees to let him sell.

Let’s get all the acronyms out in the open. Digital World Acquisition Corporation (DWAC), a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), has been in negotiations for years to merge with Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) and list on the NASDAQ as $DJT. But it has encountered obstacles in shareholder reticence, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) scrutiny, and even grand jury subpoenas.

And that’s without reckoning with the questionable success of Truth Social, the partisan social network hurriedly stood up after the former president was booted from Twitter. TMTG reportedly had a net loss of around $49 million in 2023, on revenues of under $4 million — not exactly hot numbers.

Various troubles caused the DWAC-TMTG merger to be kicked down the road over and over, and it was beginning to look like the shareholders would eventually walk away when the timing exceeded the bounds stipulated in the SPAC terms.

But today the companies filed the necessary paperwork with the SEC to consummate the merger. With DWAC stock having risen in anticipation of this event to more than $42 per share, and Trump the largest holder with $79 million shares, he could soon find himself owning $3 billion in equity in the new company.

The timing is certainly fortuitous for Trump. He must post hundreds of millions in bond very, very soon or face forfeiture of his assets as part of a major fraud case in New York, not to mention other damages, loans, and ongoing cases that may add to his debt. A $3 billion windfall would be welcome to him — if he can sell it.

Just one problem: a “lock-up” condition of the merger under which the board must approve any sale of stock by a company’s officers and major investors for the next six months.

There’s no doubt that many, many shareholders in the newly public TMTG will sell their shares as soon as possible. But if Trump wanted to finance his current liabilities, he’d have to sell some 12 million shares at the current price — around 15% of his total stake. Would the board approve this?

They’ll be sailing between Scylla and Charybdis: on one hand, a day-zero sell-off by Trump could drive the price down and trigger even more as people dispose of their shares before they drop below their purchase value. On the other hand, if Trump isn’t bailed out, he could conceivably go bankrupt, imperiling the enterprise from a different direction.

One potential out is for Trump to use his shares as collateral for a loan, with the understanding that they’d be sold in 6 months and not today. But that may depend on someone willing to speculate on the value of those shares six months from today — not a simple bet to make. If the company’s stock were to drop below, say, $8 — a deflation of value not at all uncommon in SPACs — Trump’s entire stake might not be worth what he owes in New York.

We don’t know exactly when $DJT will begin trading, but assuming all the paperwork goes through, it should be very soon. We’ll be keeping a close eye on this unusual and consequential deal.

Is the ‘exodus’ over? Here’s how Twitter alternatives have fared since Elon Musk’s acquisition