YouTube tests a new way for creators to avoid takedowns

Image Credits: YouTube

YouTube is now testing a new feature that will let creators edit their videos to remove age restrictions and restore videos that had been impacted due to certain Community Guidelines violations.

Until now, if a video received an age restriction label or was removed for breaking YouTube’s Community Guidelines, creators had to go through an appeal process and wait for the result. Creators could only appeal once, and there was no recourse but to accept the result.

The company is now giving creators another chance to have the age restrictions removed or reinstate video with this test. On its support page, YouTube said eligible creators will see a new option to edit their content in YouTube Studio.

Once the creator edits the video, the YouTube team will review these changes and remove any age restrictions or Community Guidelines violation strikes. The company said creators can also choose to appeal the decision rather than edit the video, as before.

YouTube said creators with access to advanced features will be able to use the edit feature.

The feature is useful for creators who might have overlooked something while editing a video and can make an edit without changing the narration or style. It is also useful for folks who might not have known if YouTube had made a change to their policy. But folks who feel that YouTube’s strikes are breaking their creative freedom might still choose to appeal the video streaming service’s decisions.

Over the years, creators have expressed annoyance with YouTube’s Community Guideline striking system. Last year, the company introduced a new program that lets creators take training to wipe out their strikes as long as they don’t break the rules again within 90 days of taking the training.

With YouTube rolling out more AI tools to aid video making, it will need to form policies around how AI is used in these videos. Earlier this year, the platform started tightening the noose around videos that “realistically simulate” deceased children or victims of crimes. Creators might also use third-party AI tools to make and edit videos. AI can make mistakes while editing and overlook content that could potentially break YouTube’s rules. The company’s new test might give an out for creators whose videos might fall under this bracket.

The story has been updated with YouTube’s input about creator eligibility.

YouTube is testing another way to combat ad blockers

A collection of ad blocker browser illustrated images collated on a red background

Image Credits: Getty Images

YouTube continues its efforts to circumvent ad blockers. Earlier this week, ad blocker SponsorBlock posted that the Google-owned video service is testing out server-side ad injection with a limited number of users.

Essentially, this means that the ad is injected into the video before it arrives on your device (in contrast to client-side ad injection, where the ads arrive at your device separately), making it harder for software to detect and block the ad.

“This breaks sponsorblock since now all timestamps are offset by the ad times,” SponsorBlock said.

A Google spokesperson seemed to confirm the test in a statement, writing that the service is “improving its performance and reliability in serving both organic and ad video content,” with an update that “may result in suboptimal viewing experiences for viewers with ad blockers installed.”

Google reiterated its position that ad blockers “violate YouTube’s Terms of Service” and that viewers who want an ad-free experience should sign up for YouTube Premium.

This is just the latest move in an ongoing battle, with YouTube constantly finding new ways to get around ad blockers and the ad blockers then trying to adapt. In fact, the company rolled out a pop-up message last year that essentially prevented visitors from watching videos on YouTube unless they disabled their ad blockers.

When I spoke to the companies behind several ad blockers last fall, Ghostery’s director of product and engineering Krzysztof Modras told me that “as one of the world’s largest publishers, YouTube constantly invests in circumventing ad blocking” and that it “seems to be adapting [its] methods more frequently than ever before.”

More recently, an email from another ad blocker, AdGuard, suggested that while the server-side approach is new to YouTube on the web, the service has already been doing something similar in its mobile apps. 

AdGuard said it remains “optimistic that solutions will emerge, albeit requiring concerted efforts and innovative approaches from ad-blocking developers and ad filtering community.”

Rondo Energy funding shows a new way across the climate startup 'valley of death'

Rondo battery bricks stacked in a warehouse.

Image Credits: Rondo Energy

Outside of AI, few startups have drawn venture investments like climate tech. And like AI, companies in the sector need large infusions of cash, sometimes well beyond what a typical venture investor might offer, to reach a size where they’ll be able to make a mark.

A new deal involving Rondo Energy, which makes thermal energy batteries, suggests a new way forward: philanthropic grants.

Climate tech startups like Rondo, especially those that are building hardware, face a particular challenge when trying to move beyond the prototype or pilot phase and start selling finished products to customers. Some have called it the “commercial valley of death,” others say it’s the “first-of-a-kind” problem. 

It’s very difficult to raise funds at that stage because investors don’t have a blueprint to help them balance risk and reward.

Venture investors hesitate to commit at that stage because a lot of the technical risk has already been sorted, meaning returns won’t be as high. On the other side, infrastructure investors, who would normally underwrite projects of that scale, aren’t forthcoming because first-of-a-kind plants are considered too risky. The quandary is so widespread and pressing has become a constant topic of conversation among climate tech investors — almost to the point of obsession. (To wit: Exantia has made “first-of-a-kind” themed merch.) 

The folks at Bill Gates’s Breakthrough Energy aren’t immune, either. In addition to its venture arm, the organization also has a growth-stage platform, Catalyst, which helps promising venture-funded companies cross the valley of death. This week, it announced a deal that could serve as a template for others.

Along with the European Investment Bank, Catalyst announced on Wednesday that it would provide €75 million in project finance to install three of Rondo’s thermal batteries, which can store searing heat for up to 18 hours. One goal of the financing is to prove that the startup’s product can replace fossil fuels in a range of industries. But it’s the nature of the transaction that may ultimately have a broader impact.

While the European Investment Bank’s portion of the financing is a loan, Catalyst’s is a grant. Now, grants aren’t atypical in climate tech, but they’re usually made earlier when the core science or technology has yet to be proven. Here, Catalyst is hoping to use its grant to help Rondo tackle a later-stage concern: customer adoption.

“This is a commercial-scale application and deployment. There are no tests here. It’s just the fact that has never been done before,” Mario Fernandez, head of Breakthrough Energy’s Catalyst, told TechCrunch.

The three customers involved in the deal, a chemical plant, a combined heat and power plant, and a food and beverage factory, were willing to bear the risk of adding a new technology to their operations, but they weren’t necessarily interested in paying for the privilege to do so. Infrastructure investors didn’t want to front them the money, either — at least not yet.

“The infrastructure world is a world where there is a very long list of checkboxes that you have to check in order to make these investments,” Fernandez said. “Part of our mission is to see how those checkboxes are checked in a way that makes them comfortable enough to be able to participate.”

Catalyst’s hope here is that Rondo’s three installations will prove to infrastructure investors that projects like these are sound investments and the risks surrounding them are sufficiently characterized. Ideally, the new projects won’t just unlock financing for future Rondo installations, but provide a roadmap for other investors and startups working with similar technologies.

“Clearly, we don’t have the money to de-risk every single technology pathway,” Fernandez said. “Our job is much bigger than just funding individual projects, but rather, how do we push the whole ecosystem forward.”

Facebook creators have a new way to avoid 'jail'

facebook glitch

Image Credits: TechCrunch

Facebook creators are being given a new option that will help them avoid jail — “Facebook jail,” that is — upon their first violation, and at various times after. In a revised policy, announced on Wednesday, social networking giant Meta said that creators who violate the company’s Community Standards for the first time will be offered the option to take a new training course instead of receiving a formal warning.

Upon completion of the course, the warning will be removed from the user’s account, Meta explained in a blog post aimed at creators.

Image Credits: Meta

Typically, Facebook doles out penalties to users who break its rules, including throwing users into “Facebook jail” — a term that refers to their temporarily limited abilities to post and interact on the platform following a violation. Last year, Facebook introduced changes to this process, doling out more warnings before penalty actions were taken. Now, the company is making it possible to remove those initial warnings, too.

For creators, the change will help them maintain their reach and visibility on the platform, even if they make a mistake. It also follows a similar lightening of the penalty system run by YouTube, announced last year. Like YouTube now offers, Facebook creators will be able to take a short, educational course to wipe out their warning under the new guidelines.

As Meta explains, the updated policy is focused on “educating — not punishing” first-time rulebreakers.

The option will first be made available to Professional Mode users (creators), who will receive an in-app notification that points them to the educational training focused on the policy they violated.

In addition to removing the warning from their account, the creator will be able to participate in this “remove your warning” training again if they make no further violations for one year.

If, however, they do violate policy again within a year, they’ll receive a warning that can not be removed. Accumulating warnings and violations leads to the account facing penalties like reduced reach and more limited monetization opportunities.

The change, as well as the introduction of warnings, aims to make Facebook more approachable to newer creators who may be less familiar with its policies and rules. This, in turn, could better level the playing field for newcomers and make the platform more attractive to creators in general.

However, the company stresses that the more serious community standards will not be eligible for warning removal under this new system. This includes content that contains “sexual exploitation, the sale of high-risk drugs, or glorification of dangerous organizations and individuals,” notes Meta.

Facebook creators have a new way to avoid 'jail'

facebook glitch

Image Credits: TechCrunch

Facebook creators are being given a new option that will help them avoid jail — “Facebook jail,” that is — upon their first violation, and at various times after. In a revised policy, announced on Wednesday, social networking giant Meta said that creators who violate the company’s Community Standards for the first time will be offered the option to take a new training course instead of receiving a formal warning.

Upon completion of the course, the warning will be removed from the user’s account, Meta explained in a blog post aimed at creators.

Image Credits: Meta

Typically, Facebook doles out penalties to users who break its rules, including throwing users into “Facebook jail” — a term that refers to their temporarily limited abilities to post and interact on the platform following a violation. Last year, Facebook introduced changes to this process, doling out more warnings before penalty actions were taken. Now, the company is making it possible to remove those initial warnings, too.

For creators, the change will help them maintain their reach and visibility on the platform, even if they make a mistake. It also follows a similar lightening of the penalty system run by YouTube, announced last year. Like YouTube now offers, Facebook creators will be able to take a short, educational course to wipe out their warning under the new guidelines.

As Meta explains, the updated policy is focused on “educating — not punishing” first-time rulebreakers.

The option will first be made available to Professional Mode users (creators), who will receive an in-app notification that points them to the educational training focused on the policy they violated.

In addition to removing the warning from their account, the creator will be able to participate in this “remove your warning” training again if they make no further violations for one year.

If, however, they do violate policy again within a year, they’ll receive a warning that can not be removed. Accumulating warnings and violations leads to the account facing penalties like reduced reach and more limited monetization opportunities.

The change, as well as the introduction of warnings, aims to make Facebook more approachable to newer creators who may be less familiar with its policies and rules. This, in turn, could better level the playing field for newcomers and make the platform more attractive to creators in general.

However, the company stresses that the more serious community standards will not be eligible for warning removal under this new system. This includes content that contains “sexual exploitation, the sale of high-risk drugs, or glorification of dangerous organizations and individuals,” notes Meta.

YouTube is testing another way to combat ad blockers

A collection of ad blocker browser illustrated images collated on a red background

Image Credits: Getty Images

YouTube continues its efforts to circumvent ad blockers. Earlier this week, ad blocker SponsorBlock posted that the Google-owned video service is testing out server-side ad injection with a limited number of users.

Essentially, this means that the ad is injected into the video before it arrives on your device (in contrast to client-side ad injection, where the ads arrive at your device separately), making it harder for software to detect and block the ad.

“This breaks sponsorblock since now all timestamps are offset by the ad times,” SponsorBlock said.

A Google spokesperson seemed to confirm the test in a statement, writing that the service is “improving its performance and reliability in serving both organic and ad video content,” with an update that “may result in suboptimal viewing experiences for viewers with ad blockers installed.”

Google reiterated its position that ad blockers “violate YouTube’s Terms of Service” and that viewers who want an ad-free experience should sign up for YouTube Premium.

This is just the latest move in an ongoing battle, with YouTube constantly finding new ways to get around ad blockers and the ad blockers then trying to adapt. In fact, the company rolled out a pop-up message last year that essentially prevented visitors from watching videos on YouTube unless they disabled their ad blockers.

When I spoke to the companies behind several ad blockers last fall, Ghostery’s director of product and engineering Krzysztof Modras told me that “as one of the world’s largest publishers, YouTube constantly invests in circumventing ad blocking” and that it “seems to be adapting [its] methods more frequently than ever before.”

More recently, an email from another ad blocker, AdGuard, suggested that while the server-side approach is new to YouTube on the web, the service has already been doing something similar in its mobile apps. 

AdGuard said it remains “optimistic that solutions will emerge, albeit requiring concerted efforts and innovative approaches from ad-blocking developers and ad filtering community.”

Rondo Energy funding shows a new way across the climate startup 'valley of death'

Rondo battery bricks stacked in a warehouse.

Image Credits: Rondo Energy

Outside of AI, few startups have drawn venture investments like climate tech. And like AI, companies in the sector need large infusions of cash, sometimes well beyond what a typical venture investor might offer, to reach a size where they’ll be able to make a mark.

A new deal involving Rondo Energy, which makes thermal energy batteries, suggests a new way forward: philanthropic grants.

Climate tech startups like Rondo, especially those that are building hardware, face a particular challenge when trying to move beyond the prototype or pilot phase and start selling finished products to customers. Some have called it the “commercial valley of death,” others say it’s the “first-of-a-kind” problem. 

It’s very difficult to raise funds at that stage because investors don’t have a blueprint to help them balance risk and reward.

Venture investors hesitate to commit at that stage because a lot of the technical risk has already been sorted, meaning returns won’t be as high. On the other side, infrastructure investors, who would normally underwrite projects of that scale, aren’t forthcoming because first-of-a-kind plants are considered too risky. The quandary is so widespread and pressing has become a constant topic of conversation among climate tech investors — almost to the point of obsession. (To wit: Exantia has made “first-of-a-kind” themed merch.) 

The folks at Bill Gates’s Breakthrough Energy aren’t immune, either. In addition to its venture arm, the organization also has a growth-stage platform, Catalyst, which helps promising venture-funded companies cross the valley of death. This week, it announced a deal that could serve as a template for others.

Along with the European Investment Bank, Catalyst announced on Wednesday that it would provide €75 million in project finance to install three of Rondo’s thermal batteries, which can store searing heat for up to 18 hours. One goal of the financing is to prove that the startup’s product can replace fossil fuels in a range of industries. But it’s the nature of the transaction that may ultimately have a broader impact.

While the European Investment Bank’s portion of the financing is a loan, Catalyst’s is a grant. Now, grants aren’t atypical in climate tech, but they’re usually made earlier when the core science or technology has yet to be proven. Here, Catalyst is hoping to use its grant to help Rondo tackle a later-stage concern: customer adoption.

“This is a commercial-scale application and deployment. There are no tests here. It’s just the fact that has never been done before,” Mario Fernandez, head of Breakthrough Energy’s Catalyst, told TechCrunch.

The three customers involved in the deal, a chemical plant, a combined heat and power plant, and a food and beverage factory, were willing to bear the risk of adding a new technology to their operations, but they weren’t necessarily interested in paying for the privilege to do so. Infrastructure investors didn’t want to front them the money, either — at least not yet.

“The infrastructure world is a world where there is a very long list of checkboxes that you have to check in order to make these investments,” Fernandez said. “Part of our mission is to see how those checkboxes are checked in a way that makes them comfortable enough to be able to participate.”

Catalyst’s hope here is that Rondo’s three installations will prove to infrastructure investors that projects like these are sound investments and the risks surrounding them are sufficiently characterized. Ideally, the new projects won’t just unlock financing for future Rondo installations, but provide a roadmap for other investors and startups working with similar technologies.

“Clearly, we don’t have the money to de-risk every single technology pathway,” Fernandez said. “Our job is much bigger than just funding individual projects, but rather, how do we push the whole ecosystem forward.”

YouTube is testing another way to combat ad blockers

A collection of ad blocker browser illustrated images collated on a red background

Image Credits: Getty Images

YouTube continues its efforts to circumvent ad blockers. Earlier this week, ad blocker SponsorBlock posted that the Google-owned video service is testing out server-side ad injection with a limited number of users.

Essentially, this means that both the ad is injected into the video before it arrives on your device (in contrast to client-side ad injection, where the ads arrive at your device separately), making it harder for software to detect and block the ad.

“This breaks sponsorblock since now all timestamps are offset by the ad times,” SponsorBlock said.

A Google spokesperson seemed to confirm the test in a statement, writing that the service is “improving its performance and reliability in serving both organic and ad video content,” with an update that “may result in suboptimal viewing experiences for viewers with ad blockers installed.”

Google reiterated its position that ad blockers “violate YouTube’s Terms of Service” and that viewers who want an ad-free experience should sign up for YouTube Premium.

This is just the latest move in an ongoing battle, with YouTube constantly finding new ways to get around ad blockers and the ad blockers then trying to adapt. In fact, the company rolled out a pop-up message last year that essentially prevented visitors from watching videos on YouTube unless they disabled their ad blockers.

When I spoke to the companies behind several ad blockers last fall, Ghostery’s director of product and engineering Krzysztof Modras told me that “as one of the world’s largest publishers, YouTube constantly invests in circumventing ad blocking” and that it “seems to be adapting [its] methods more frequently than ever before.”

More recently, an email from another ad blocker, AdGuard, suggested that while the server-side approach is new to YouTube on the web, the service has already been doing something similar in its mobile apps. 

AdGuard said it remains “optimistic that solutions will emerge, albeit requiring concerted efforts and innovative approaches from ad-blocking developers and ad filtering community.”

United Launch Alliance Astrobotic

Astrobotic lander on its way to the moon with ULA's historic flight

United Launch Alliance Astrobotic

Image Credits: United Launch Alliance (opens in a new window)

It’s hard to understate just how much was at stake in Monday’s early morning launch of United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur rocket: multiple major reputations, billions of dollars, a new moon lander, the country’s dreams for lunar exploration, brand new rocket engines flying for the first time and what is quite literally ULA’s future.

And ULA pulled it off. The company’s next-generation rocket Vulcan Centaur successfully lifted off in the early hours of Monday, and its primary payload, a lunar lander from Astrobotic, is now on its way to the moon.

The heavy-lift rocket took off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Center at 2:18 a.m. EST Monday. The first stage, which is powered by two methane-fueled BE-4 engines from Blue Origin, separated from the Centaur V upper stage at around 2:24.

Main-engine cut-off on the Centaur took place around T+15 minutes. The Centaur executed two more burns to get Astrobotic’s Peregrine lander on the correct trajectory to the moon. With those complete, the lander, called Peregrine, will now embark on a one-and-a-half month journey to the moon. Peregrine is taking a slightly longer route to the moon, and so will have to execute a handful of complicated burns to maneuver into progressively lower lunar orbits. Eventually, the spacecraft will attempt to land autonomously near a region called Gruithuisen Domes on February 23.

The launch and subsequent journey to the moon are a watershed moment for both United Launch Alliance and Astrobotic. The former company, a 50-50 joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin, is envisioned as the future of ULA. The rocket is designed to replace the Atlas V and Delta IV Heavy, both of which are due to retire.

The rocket is also designed to compete against other launch providers, like SpaceX, by offering a large payload fairing and an adjustable configuration depending on the mission profile. So customers will be able to choose between two payload fairing sizes (51 or 70 feet long) and four standard configurations with zero, two, four or six solid rocket boosters, depending on the mission profile and customer requirements.

ULA has already sold a number of missions for the 202-foot-tall Vulcan, including 38 launches to Amazon to deploy part of its ambitious Project Kuiper satellite broadband constellation. The launch company also won over two dozen contracts with the U.S. Space Force (USSF), though it must complete one more certification launch before it can start fulfilling those launches.

If all goes to plan, ULA could execute that second certification launch, called Cert-2, as early as April. That mission will fly another high-profile, high-stakes payload: Sierra Space’s Dream Chaser spaceplane, which would take a journey to the International Space Station. The remaining four missions on Vulcan’s manifest this year would all be for USSF.

ULA and Astrobotic are not the only ones with something to celebrate: This is also the first time that Blue Origin’s BE-4 engines have seen flight, a triumph that comes after nearly a decade of development. While Vulcan will initially be fully expendable, the eventual aim is to recover the two engines mid-air and reuse them to further drive down costs.

Astrobotic’s Peregrine is also the first lander to fly under NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program, an initiative to kickstart the development of lunar delivery services from commercial providers. Pittsburgh-based Astrobotic was awarded $79.5 million for this mission in 2019, a cost that was later increased to $108 million; even if it doesn’t manage to stick the moon landing, it’s still a major proof-of-concept for NASA’s ambitious efforts to foster advanced space services from private industry.

Developing…