Xyte stirs up $30M to enable any hardware maker to build subscription products

The hardware industry is under pressure these days: slower spending cycles from consumers and businesses, market saturation — not to mention innovation largely coming in the form of software at the moment — are all contributing to an overall decline in sales. Now, a startup has raised some funding to expand its alternative to hardware sales: hardware-as-a-service.

Xyte (pronounced “Excite”), an Israeli startup that lets hardware OEMs and their channel partners build subscription services for devices, has raised $30 million in funding.

The money is coming in two tranches. There is a $20 million Series A led by Intel Capital with Samsung Next, S Capital and Mindset Ventures participating, which will be used to expand the company’s business in the U.S. (where it opened an office in Silicon Valley a few months ago).

And there is a $10 million debt line from BlackRock that it plans to use to help customers make the transition to subscription models. “OEMs have cash flow challenges, moving from one-time to recurring revenues, they still have bills of materials and other expenses,” said Xyte’s CEO Omer Brookstein.

He said the company is not disclosing its valuation with this round except to note that it is “reasonable” in light of the current state of the market and the fact that startups are no longer being overvalued as they might have been in previous years. Since launching in 2019, Xyte has raised $37 million to date, including that $10 million debt tranche.

Some other data points from Brookstein: customers number in the “thousands” with tens of thousands of devices managed on the Xyte platform. ARR is currently $1 million and it’s on track to triple that this year, and the next. Customers include Intel, Schneider Electric and Rebar, and there are some recognizable names among those currently talking to the company. In other words, it’s still early days for Xyte, but there are some signals of good growth ahead.

“Hardware as a service” might not sound as familiar as SaaS but in some regards it’s a model that has been in place for a while.

Mobile operators for years offered hardware as a service when they sold, for a monthly payment, phones on contracts that bundled temporary ownership of a handset with a mobile voice, text and data service contract, and — after the rise of smartphones — potentially other premium services like music subscriptions bundled in too.

Further back than that, you could argue that basic hardware leasing plans were also an early incarnation of “HaaS” — albeit those typically came as bare device deals, with software still to be purchased outright by the customers on top of that.

But Xyte believes there is a new gap in the market that spells opportunity. Before starting Xyte with co-founder Boris Dinkevich (who is the CTO), Brookstein worked at a device maker called Crestron, building high-end AV systems that proved to be very expensive to shift when it came to sales. It was there that he first started to think about how a service model might be applied to devices like these, he said.

Those ideas were given more velocity by other changing tides in the market. The growth of cloud services has been the big juggernaut in IT over the last several years. Gartner’s most recent report on IT spend, for example, said growth would come in cloud services, with areas like software and services growing nearly 14% and 9% respectively, while hardware sales would continue to decline by nearly 9% this year.

And when you consider developments in areas like AI, software has taken the spotlight away from hardware when it’s come to innovations.

That’s something catching on with hardware makers themselves, who have started to shift into building considerably more services around their devices. While trailblazing, trend-setting leaders like Apple have yet to move to hardware-as-a-service itself for the iPhone or anything else, for years there have been rumors of its interest in that area. Innovations like eSIM, which let you swap carriers more easily; easy trade-ins of old devices for new; and of course introducing very expensive new devices like headsets, all could be helping to lay the groundwork for Apple to longer term consider HaaS in the future.

There is also the argument, Brookstein noted, that building subscriptions is not a core competency of an OEM, which is one reason why the company believes it has a shot at working with a large range of third parties in building out such services as a complement to more traditional sales.

He likens what Xyte is doing to Stripe and Shopify, which provide the tools to enable transactions or online selling to companies that might not be experts in these areas, but still need to incorporate these processes into their businesses.

“Shopify realised, very early days, that if I’m an SMB a mom-and-pop shop and I want to do some e-commerce, I don’t have the skill set to connect…whatever. I just want a store,” he said. “I think in many ways, it’s very similar to what we do.” Another comparable is Paddle, which offers a platform for subscriptions as a service to app and software makers.

Taken together, the idea that Xyte has put together is a platform that lets companies not just build out equipment subscriptions, but bundling that equipment with other services that a customer might want to use. That in turn can be applied to anything from a connected truck through to a laptop. Usage can be charged either on length of ownership, or by usage. (Pricing also comes by way of monthly subscriptions to Xyte’s customers.) The original business, the OEM or a channel partner, can in turn use the platform to manage and track devices, and provide that too as a service to its customers as well.

Initially, Xyte has focused on the B2B market, betting on the fact that enterprises and smaller businesses not only already do a lot of equipment leasing and have to manage chain of supply and device management around that already.

“What I’m seeing in the market is more and more businesses are looking for a way to upgrade experiences and deliver new services, but they don’t necessarily want to spend a bunch of money on hardware, they want to pay X amount of dollars and have it work,” Brian McCarson, VP and General Manager of the NUC Group at Intel, said of the rationale of why some companies are moving to using a service model for equipment.

But Brookstein said that it’s started to discover that its customers are also interesting in building out HaaS that they want to offer to consumers, too — one example being Schneider electric selling its Wizer connected home heating products on Xyte-powered subscriptions — coming full circle from the days of mobile handset subsidies.

Xyte stirs up $30M to enable any hardware maker to build subscription products

The hardware industry is under pressure these days: slower spending cycles from consumers and businesses, market saturation — not to mention innovation largely coming in the form of software at the moment — are all contributing to an overall decline in sales. Now, a startup has raised some funding to expand its alternative to hardware sales: hardware-as-a-service.

Xyte (pronounced “Excite”), an Israeli startup that lets hardware OEMs and their channel partners build subscription services for devices, has raised $30 million in funding.

The money is coming in two tranches. There is a $20 million Series A led by Intel Capital with Samsung Next, S Capital and Mindset Ventures participating, which will be used to expand the company’s business in the U.S. (where it opened an office in Silicon Valley a few months ago).

And there is a $10 million debt line from BlackRock that it plans to use to help customers make the transition to subscription models. “OEMs have cash flow challenges, moving from one-time to recurring revenues, they still have bills of materials and other expenses,” said Xyte’s CEO Omer Brookstein.

He said the company is not disclosing its valuation with this round except to note that it is “reasonable” in light of the current state of the market and the fact that startups are no longer being overvalued as they might have been in previous years. Since launching in 2019, Xyte has raised $37 million to date, including that $10 million debt tranche.

Some other data points from Brookstein: customers number in the “thousands” with tens of thousands of devices managed on the Xyte platform. ARR is currently $1 million and it’s on track to triple that this year, and the next. Customers include Intel, Schneider Electric and Rebar, and there are some recognizable names among those currently talking to the company. In other words, it’s still early days for Xyte, but there are some signals of good growth ahead.

“Hardware as a service” might not sound as familiar as SaaS but in some regards it’s a model that has been in place for a while.

Mobile operators for years offered hardware as a service when they sold, for a monthly payment, phones on contracts that bundled temporary ownership of a handset with a mobile voice, text and data service contract, and — after the rise of smartphones — potentially other premium services like music subscriptions bundled in too.

Further back than that, you could argue that basic hardware leasing plans were also an early incarnation of “HaaS” — albeit those typically came as bare device deals, with software still to be purchased outright by the customers on top of that.

But Xyte believes there is a new gap in the market that spells opportunity. Before starting Xyte with co-founder Boris Dinkevich (who is the CTO), Brookstein worked at a device maker called Crestron, building high-end AV systems that proved to be very expensive to shift when it came to sales. It was there that he first started to think about how a service model might be applied to devices like these, he said.

Those ideas were given more velocity by other changing tides in the market. The growth of cloud services has been the big juggernaut in IT over the last several years. Gartner’s most recent report on IT spend, for example, said growth would come in cloud services, with areas like software and services growing nearly 14% and 9% respectively, while hardware sales would continue to decline by nearly 9% this year.

And when you consider developments in areas like AI, software has taken the spotlight away from hardware when it’s come to innovations.

That’s something catching on with hardware makers themselves, who have started to shift into building considerably more services around their devices. While trailblazing, trend-setting leaders like Apple have yet to move to hardware-as-a-service itself for the iPhone or anything else, for years there have been rumors of its interest in that area. Innovations like eSIM, which let you swap carriers more easily; easy trade-ins of old devices for new; and of course introducing very expensive new devices like headsets, all could be helping to lay the groundwork for Apple to longer term consider HaaS in the future.

There is also the argument, Brookstein noted, that building subscriptions is not a core competency of an OEM, which is one reason why the company believes it has a shot at working with a large range of third parties in building out such services as a complement to more traditional sales.

He likens what Xyte is doing to Stripe and Shopify, which provide the tools to enable transactions or online selling to companies that might not be experts in these areas, but still need to incorporate these processes into their businesses.

“Shopify realised, very early days, that if I’m an SMB a mom-and-pop shop and I want to do some e-commerce, I don’t have the skill set to connect…whatever. I just want a store,” he said. “I think in many ways, it’s very similar to what we do.” Another comparable is Paddle, which offers a platform for subscriptions as a service to app and software makers.

Taken together, the idea that Xyte has put together is a platform that lets companies not just build out equipment subscriptions, but bundling that equipment with other services that a customer might want to use. That in turn can be applied to anything from a connected truck through to a laptop. Usage can be charged either on length of ownership, or by usage. (Pricing also comes by way of monthly subscriptions to Xyte’s customers.) The original business, the OEM or a channel partner, can in turn use the platform to manage and track devices, and provide that too as a service to its customers as well.

Initially, Xyte has focused on the B2B market, betting on the fact that enterprises and smaller businesses not only already do a lot of equipment leasing and have to manage chain of supply and device management around that already.

“What I’m seeing in the market is more and more businesses are looking for a way to upgrade experiences and deliver new services, but they don’t necessarily want to spend a bunch of money on hardware, they want to pay X amount of dollars and have it work,” Brian McCarson, VP and General Manager of the NUC Group at Intel, said of the rationale of why some companies are moving to using a service model for equipment.

But Brookstein said that it’s started to discover that its customers are also interesting in building out HaaS that they want to offer to consumers, too — one example being Schneider electric selling its Wizer connected home heating products on Xyte-powered subscriptions — coming full circle from the days of mobile handset subsidies.

Pitch Deck Teardown: Xyte's $30M Series A deck

Image Credits: Xyte (opens in a new window)

When I was a student in the U.K., I remember that renting appliances like washing machines and televisions was the norm for some people, especially students living in short-term accommodations. Israeli startup Xyte (pronounced “excite”) has just raised $30 million, as it sees a return to this sort of hardware-as-a-service model to be the way forward for manufacturers whose margins are under constant pressure. If it works so well for software-as-a-service, why not hardware?

Xyte let me take a look at its 27-slide deck to see how it pulled it off. Was I excited by Xyte’s deck? Sadly, no. This 27-slide deck was short on the information that I would need as an investor to make an informed decision on whether or not to invest in it. Let’s break down what I saw.


We’re looking for more unique pitch decks to tear down, so if you want to submit your own, here’s how you can do that.


Slides in this deck

Xyte’s deck features 27 slides, some with redacted information. The redactions relate to its customers and trading figures, which is both fair enough and also makes it a bit trickier to get a picture of the full company.

Cover slideCompany overview, including some team detailsTeam slideOpportunity slideOpportunity 2 slideMarket slideProblem slideValue proposition slideSolution slide  Solution 2 slide  Solution 3 slide  Dedicated interfaces slide  Traction slide  “Any industry, any size” slide (customer base)  Value proposition slide  Business transformation slide  “Unique business and commerce platform” slide  Customer study slide  “Pioneering a new product category” slide  “A single, integrated platform” slide  Team 2 slide  Interstitial slide  Business model slide  Go-to-market slide  “Forecast and drivers” slide  Investment summary slide  Closing slide

Three Two things to love

You might think that with 27 slides, there would be plenty to pick from for the “three good things” section. Dear reader, I’m not gonna lie: Try as I might, I really struggled to find three good things about this deck.

So, let’s talk about the two sparks of brilliance I could spot in this inky void of despair:

Opening summary

[Slide 2] A very well-done at-a-glance slide. Image Credits: Xyte

Xyte’s slide deck, overall, was a pretty underwhelming cavalcade of mediocrity. Still, I did really enjoy this one-slide summary right at the beginning.

Even with some of the core numbers redacted, it shows off a lot of important information at a glance that will likely get an investor to take note. In fact, I think this slide will become my recommended template for most startups raising money — it’s crisp, clear, and to the point, and it helps set the scene for what’s to come.

Pulling it all together

I have a lot of respect for summaries, and this deck pulled it off not once, but twice. The first one sets the stage, and the second one (below) summarizes the same story once more, but through the lens of an investor.

[Slide 26] A solid summary pulling it all together. Image Credits: Xyte

I really like the way the team did this. Illustrating that the company has figured out a problem and go-to-market strategy that makes sense is great. So good, in fact, that I’m going to look at each of these points separately:

Enormous opportunity: Yes! A startup has to reach “VC scale” in order to be investable at all. It might have been worth it to remind the investor of the actual market size here, but this slightly more abstract summary works well.Unique solution: Yes! Including a reminder of what you actually do is great.World-class product: I’d have loved to see this point backed by data, to be honest. Is it a world-class product? Maybe, but bring the receipts!Validated solution: Sure, but remember to include the why. What validates this solution? I suspect the point the company is truly trying to make here is related to the next point . . .Scalable GTM strategy: Being able to acquire customers at scale is what causes a startup to stop being a startup, and that’s a good thing. For bonus points, I’d have reminded the investors of the CAC:LTV ratio here, but it’s a damn fine start.Vision: Meh. This isn’t a reminder of the company’s vision, which is a missed opportunity. Perhaps, instead, it could have swapped in a team summary to remind the investors why this is the right team to build this company.

Minor tweaks aside, I think this “investment summary” slide does a lot of work, and I’m glad the team chose to include it.

In the rest of this teardown, we’ll look at three things Xyte could have improved or done differently, along with its full pitch deck!

Three things that could be improved

As you might have expected, the inverse of struggling to select three good things from 27 slides is an abundance of not-so-great slides. It wasn’t easy to choose, but here are some of the ones that really stood out.

The curse of the illustrative graph

[Slide 13] Welcome to the illustration graph. Image Credits: Xyte

I love a good graph. This isn’t one of them. Even with a heavily redacted slide without the actual milestones and axis information, this slide comes up short. I see these types of performative, illustrative graphs in decks quite a lot, and they are utterly meaningless.

If you’re going to chart data, chart real data. It’s never this smooth and predictable. These kinds of pretty, well-rounded charts just feel dishonest; I know you have better data than that. Use it, show it off. Don’t risk creating the impression that you’re trying to hide anything.

This split team slide needs to go

Somehow, slides 3 and 21 are both team slides. They are separated by almost a full pitch deck, but neither (individually or together) helps explain what an investor needs to understand.

[Slide 3] A part of the team. Image Credits: Xyte
[Slide 21] A part of the team. Image Credits: Xyte

I honestly don’t see the point of either of these slides because they don’t meet the sniff test for fundraising: The question you are trying to answer is, “Why is this the perfect team to back with $30 million?” A bunch of pictures with names and job titles isn’t going to cut it.

And then adding a slide similarly lacking in information, but of more junior staff (who your investors are absolutely going to give zero craps about), is just a waste.

Help me understand:

Why is this team inherently a part of your competitive advantage?Why would I be crazy to invest anywhere else?What skills and experience does this team have that nobody else does?

Neither of these slides helps tell that story, and it’s so easy to do a lot better.

The Team Slide is the most important slide in a startup pitch deck

That’s . . . not a go-to-market slide

[Slide 24] The slide says “go to market,” but it doesn’t explain how. Image Credits: Xyte

If you’re going to be out there raising $30 million, I’d want to see a solid and detailed go-to-market plan based on data from existing sales and extrapolating that into the future. If you’re doubling your sales team, are you doubling your sales? Tripling it? If you spend 3x more on marketing, will that result in a proportional increase in revenue?

This slide is barely a functioning brainstorm.

A much better way to do it would be to cover some, or ideally, all of the below:

Target customers: It’s crucial to understand your target customers by conducting thorough market research. Analyze their behaviors, preferences, challenges and how they currently solve the problems your product aims to address. This enables you to tailor your product and messaging to meet their specific needs. It makes you a safer investment overall, too.Customer acquisition strategy: Expand on the tactics you will use to attract these customers. What’s the top of funnel (presumably a mix of digital marketing, content marketing, partnerships, and sales strategies)? Provide details on the platforms you will use and why they are effective for reaching your target market, with cost implications.Customer acquisition cost (CAC): Analyze your customer acquisition costs in depth by considering all associated expenses, including marketing, sales and any discounts or incentives. Benchmark these costs against industry averages and detail strategies to optimize and reduce CAC over time.Expansion and scalability: Discuss your expansion plans with a focus on how you will scale operations, technology and the team to support growth. Include potential challenges and how you plan to address them. Highlight pilot projects or market tests that validate your expansion strategy.Financial projections and metrics: Offer detailed financial projections that account for revenue growth, margin improvements and cash flow. Explain the assumptions behind your projections, such as market size, penetration rates and pricing strategy. Also, discuss the key performance indicators you will track to measure success and make informed decisions.

Incorporating these details into the pitch will demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of your business model, market, and growth strategy. And that, dear founders, is what a great go-to-market slide would look like.

The full pitch deck


If you want your own pitch deck teardown featured on TC+, here’s more information. Also, check out all our Pitch Deck Teardowns and other pitching advice, all collected in one handy place for you!