Caroline Ellison sentenced to two years in prison for FTX fraud

Image Credits: Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images

Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of FTX affiliate Alameda Research, was sentenced to two years in prison on Tuesday.

Ellison had pled guilty to conspiring with FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried to steal $8 billion worth of customers’ funds, but she was an exceedingly cooperative witness, helping law enforcement to investigate the massive fraud scheme. Her two-year sentence stands in stark contrast to Bankman-Fried’s 25-year sentence.

Though he is currently in prison, Bankman-Fried has continued to appeal his sentence. Unlike Ellison, the former FTX founder pled not guilty. Two other former FTX executives, Gary Wang and Nishad Singh, await sentencing.

Why OnePlus waited three years to release a new smartwatch

Image Credits: OnePlus

OnePlus’ second smartwatch captured media interest this week, courtesy of its stated 100 hours of battery life. The device utilizes a clever dual-chip system, seamlessly switching from the Snapdragon W5 to the far more power-efficient BES 2700 MCU. If the device does its job correctly, users won’t notice the shift, beyond the extra battery life it brings.

The OnePlus Watch 2 is also notable for the three-year gap between releases. The first-gen device received lukewarm reviews, leading some to speculate that the Oppo-owned company might have backed out of the watch space altogether. Instead, customer pushback simply sent the company back to the drawing board.

This morning, ahead of the device’s official unveiling, I sat down with Tuomas Lampén, OnePlus Europe’s head of strategy, on a pair of folding chairs outside Google’s MWC booth. In spite of OnePlus’ big news, the company opted out of a booth this year, preferring instead to hold an off-site briefing a day prior to the show’s kickoff. Lampén was, naturally, wearing the Watch 2, gesturing to the device frequently over the course of our conversation.

It’s perhaps unfair to classify the device as a clean break from its predecessor. In addition to the lessons learned from the earlier device, the low-power element of the hybrid chip design relies on some features designed specifically for the Watch 1. So the first product wasn’t entirely an evolutionary dead end. Many of its shortcomings could, however, be pinned on the product’s chip and OnePlus’ decision to go with the barebones in-house operating system, Real-Time Operating System (RTOS), rather than Google’s considerably more ubiquitous Wear OS.

In terms of functionality, the first OnePlus Watch more closely resembled pre-Apple Watch smartwatches. This afforded the product excellent battery life, but most consumers are looking for something with more smart functionality than your average fitness band. Lampén admits that community feedback “wasn’t great.”

He adds, “For me, personally, I didn’t do any fitness tracking or stuff like that. It was a great companion for the phone — notifications and stuff like that. It was pretty simple. You could say that we used the time to talk to our community and figure out how to make a great smartwatch.”

Community has been a fundamental aspect of OnePlus’ operations since its inception. Forums played an integral role in the development of its early smartphones, with the company soliciting feedback and regularly engaging with its then-small customer base. As organizations grow, however, it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain those sorts of intimate connections. As it added more products and was eventually folded into Oppo, OnePlus faced criticism that it had lost sight of the connections that made the company so unique.

The Watch 2 is, however, very much a product of these connections. Lampén says Wear OS and battery were the two most requested features for the product. As such, the new device presents a kind of balancing act between the two. According to OnePlus, the second watch has been in the works at least since the first was released. The company apparently didn’t seriously consider exiting the category altogether, in spite of what appear to be disappointing sales. Lampén says he doesn’t know the exact figure, while adding that the company didn’t manufacture as many devices as it could sell, leading to a shortage in certain areas like Europe. One assumes, however, that had the original device garnered the reception the company had hoped for, it would have fired up production to meet that demand.

The hybrid chip/OS system was a major contributor to the gap between devices, according to Lampén. “Building the dual-engine architecture . . . took some time,” the executive notes. “We had to work with Qualcomm and Google engineers to get it working. They had to do modifications on both the Snapdragon chip and even Google had to change something in Wear OS.”

Image Credits: OnePlus

It’s difficult to say precisely what Google is getting out of the deal, beyond seeing another Wear OS device come to market. If the company’s work with Samsung on a foldable friendly version of Android is any indication, this could point to future Wear OS devices utilizing a similar hybrid approach to eke out as much battery life as possible. Lampén interjects, “I’m sure we filed a bunch of patents [pertaining to the dual-architecture engine],” suggesting that such technology could remain proprietary for some time.

Depending on how inclusive such patents are (and whether they’re granted), OnePlus could potentially license the tech, addressing what is commonly understood to be smartphones’ biggest shortcoming. Unsurprisingly, the executive didn’t speculate about its possible future outside of OnePlus’ own devices.

The new technology also means a significantly higher price tag. At $299, Watch 2 is nearly double its predecessor’s $160 starting price. Lampén refers to the new product as a “flagship device,” owing to both functionality and a price point that puts it more in line with the Samsungs and Apples of the world. Flagship also seems to imply the future arrival of a lower cost version, though, again, the executive predictably wouldn’t speculate on the matter.

Read more about MWC 2024 on TechCrunch

NEW YORK, USA - JUNE 15: FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried arrives at Manhattan Federal Court for a court appearance in New York, United States on June 15, 2023. (Photo by Fatih Aktas/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years in prison for fraud and money laundering at FTX, ordered to pay $11B in forfeiture

NEW YORK, USA - JUNE 15: FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried arrives at Manhattan Federal Court for a court appearance in New York, United States on June 15, 2023. (Photo by Fatih Aktas/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Image Credits: Fatih Aktas/Anadolu Agency / Getty Images

Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of crypto exchange FTX and trading firm Alameda Research, was sentenced to 25 years in prison by Southern District of New York (SDNY) Judge Lewis Kaplan, about five months after he was found guilty on all seven counts related to fraud and money laundering during his trial.

“When not lying, he was evasive, hair splitting, trying to get the prosecutors to rephrase questions for him,” Kaplan said on Thursday, according to Inner City Press. “I’ve been doing this job for close to 30 years. I’ve never seen a performance like that.”

Before sentencing, Bankman-Fried acknowledged in court that he made a “series of bad decisions,” but argued they were not “selfish” ones.

His possible total sentence for the seven counts — two fraud charges and five conspiracy charges — was a maximum of 110 years. Bankman-Fried was also ordered during the sentencing to pay forfeiture of $11 billion to the U.S. government. Kaplan said that the “punishment,” or sentencing, was to fit the seriousness of the crime.

Earlier this month, U.S. prosecutors from the Department of Justice called for a “necessary” 40- to 50-year sentence for him. “The sheer scale of Bankman-Fried’s fraud calls for severe punishment,” the notice stated. “The amount of loss—at least $10 billion—makes this one of the largest financial frauds of all time.” On Thursday, Kaplan said that range “would be more than necessary.” In late February, Bankman-Fried’s attorneys filed a notice suggesting their client gets 63 to 78 months, citing his “caring for individuals,” “remorse,” “low-level culpability” and more.

Regardless of what both parties wanted, this decades-long sentencing is a result of Bankman-Fried’s five-week trial, which dove deep into how one of the once-biggest crypto exchanges globally, and its sister trading company, collapsed in November 2022.

His sentence could also send a signal to the crypto industry at large. As Judge Kaplan is required to consider the “need for the sentence to afford adequate deterrence,” aka to discourage other white-collar defendants and for bad actors in the crypto space more generally, Josh Naftalis, a former federal prosecutor now with Pallas Partners in New York, told TechCrunch. “In other words, the court is permitted to consider how the sentence it imposes on SBF will send a message to the crypto asset industry.”

Mark Bini, who’s also a former federal and state prosecutor and now a partner at Reed Smith’s On Chain digital asset group, agrees. The sentence will be a “real marker in the crypto arena,” he said, adding that this outcome “may be a measuring stick for future sentencings involving crypto fraud.” 

And in the federal system, there’s no parole. But, defendants like Bankman-Fried can earn “good time” credit, under the First Step Act, which could reduce their sentence for good behavior while incarcerated, both lawyers noted. There’s a number of opportunities for first-time non-violent offenders to earn reductions in their sentences, Bini said. This can result in a defendant’s sentence being reduced by up to 15% of the initial sentence imposed,” Naftalis added.

Bankman-Fried has been residing in the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, ever since he lost his bail prior to his trial. Other notorious past inmates of the correctional facility include Jeffery Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell and “pharma bro” Martin Shkreli. 

Looking back on SBF and FTX

Before prison, Bankman-Fried was once on top of the crypto world, hanging with celebrities like Katy Perry and trophy-winning athletes like Tom Brady and putting his company name on Major League Baseball umpires’ shirts and the Miami Heat arena. Prior to its collapse, FTX was one of the top crypto exchanges by volume, behind Coinbase and Binance.

FTX grew its users into the “millions” before its collapse, and revenue expanded from $10 million to $20 million in 2019, to $80 million in 2020 and to $1 billion in 2021; and daily revenue in 2021 was $3 million, Bankman-Fried said during his testimony.

But Bankman-Fried quickly dwindled in popularity and trust across the crypto community after a faulty balance sheet from Alameda was unveiled by crypto media publication CoinDesk in November 2022, causing industry-wide ripple effects and concern around FTX and its liquidity. Within days, the exchange filed for bankruptcy and Bankman-Fried stepped down from his role as CEO.

His trial, and the months leading up to it, uncovered that the problem was much larger than originally thought as Bankman-Fried and other executives misused over $8 billion in customer funds. Bankman-Fried testified that he didn’t defraud FTX customers or use their funds, but that Alameda “borrowed” that capital from the exchange.

Mark Cohen, Bankman-Fried’s lead attorney, also said the government made a Hallmark movie–like case against Bankman-Fried and while he made “bad business judgments” the government has “tried to paint Sam into some sort of villain, some sort of monster.”

In the end, the jury didn’t buy that narrative. Prosecutors strongly argued Bankman-Fried made a number of false promises internally and externally and was responsible for the loss of billions of dollars for thousands of FTX investors. They emphasized how it was wrong to use FTX customers’ funds without their knowledge or approval.

And as a result, Bankman-Fried will be spending quite some time behind bars.

The article has been updated to include additional details in the third and forth paragraphs.